You are here

  • Home
  • Archive
  • Volume 9, Issue 1
  • Associations between physical activity, left atrial size and incident atrial fibrillation: the Tromsø Study 1994–2016

Article Text

Article menu
Cardiac risk factors and prevention
Original research
Associations between physical activity, left atrial size and incident atrial fibrillation: the Tromsø Study 1994–2016
  1. Kim Arne Heitmann1,2,
  2. Maja-Lisa Løchen3,
  3. Michael Stylidis3,
  4. Laila A Hopstock3,
  5. Henrik Schirmer4,5,6 and
  6. Bente Morseth1,2
  1. 1School of Sport Sciences, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway
  2. 2Centre for Research and Education, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø, Norway
  3. 3Department of Community Medicine, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway
  4. 4Department of Cardiology, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway
  5. 5Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
  6. 6Department of Clinical Medicine, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway
  1. Correspondence to Kim Arne Heitmann; kim.a.heitmann{at}uit.no

Abstract

Aims Left atrial (LA) enlargement is an independent risk factor for atrial fibrillation (AF). Interestingly, some athletes have increased risk of AF, which may be linked to LA enlargement; however, little is known about the relationship between LA enlargement and AF risk at moderate-level physical activity (PA). We aimed to explore the associations between PA, LA size and risk of incident AF, and if PA can attenuate the risk of AF with LA enlargement.

Methods This prospective study followed 2479 participants (52.4% female), free from known cardiac pathology, for median 20.2 years. Participants were followed up for hospital-diagnosed AF, confirmed by electrocardiography, from 1994-95 through 2016. At baseline, LA size was evaluated by anteroposterior LA diameter, and PA was self-reported by questionnaire.

Results We observed a U-shaped relationship between PA and AF, and moderately active had 32% lower AF risk than inactive (HRadjusted 0.68, 95% CI 0.50 to 0.93). Participants with LA enlargement had 38% higher AF risk compared with participants with normal LA size (HRadjusted 1.38, 95% CI 1.12 to 1.69). However, the increased AF risk with LA enlargement was attenuated by PA; compared with inactive participants with LA enlargement, the AF risk was 45% lower among active with LA enlargement (HRadjusted 0.55, 95% CI 0.39 to 0.79). AF risk in active participants with LA enlargement did not differ from active with normal LA size. These patterns were observed in both men and women, and in participants over/under 65 years.

Conclusion Moderate PA was associated with reduced AF risk, and PA attenuated the increased risk of AF with LA enlargement in both men and women and all age groups.

  • arrhythmias
  • cardiac
  • echocardiography
  • epidemiology

Data availability statement

Data may be obtained from a third party and are not publicly available. The legal restriction on data availability is set by the Tromsø Study Data and Publication Committee in order to control for data sharing, including publication of datasets with the potential of reverse identification of deidentified sensitive participant information. The data can, however, be made available from the Tromsø Study upon application to the Tromsø Study Data and Publication Committee. Contact information: The Tromsø Study, Department of Community Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, UiT The Arctic University of Norway; e-mail: tromsous@uit.no.

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

https://doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2021-001823

Statistics from Altmetric.com

    Request Permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

    Key questions

    What is already known about this subject?

    • Left atrial (LA) enlargement is an independent risk factor for atrial fibrillation (AF).

    • Moderate physical activity (PA) is associated with reduced risk of cardiovascular disease including AF.

    • Little is known about the role of moderate PA in the association between LA size and risk of AF in the general population.

    What does this study add?

    • In this prospective study, PA was associated with lower risk of AF in a U-shaped pattern.

    • Participants with LA enlargement had higher AF risk compared with participants with normal LA size.

    • PA attenuated the increased risk of AF with LA enlargement in both men and women and all age groups.

    How might this impact on clinical practice?

    • We suggest that the protective effect of moderate PA outweighs the potential risk of AF with LA enlargement.

    • Increased understanding of the relationship between PA and AF may guide clinicians in implementing PA in primary and secondary prevention of AF.

    Introduction

    Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common clinical arrhythmia worldwide, associated with considerably morbidity, such as stroke and heart failure.1 In 2016, the global prevalence of AF was 43.6 million, and lifetime risk for developing AF in Europeans over 55 years is approximately one in three.1 Furthermore, the risk of AF increases with ageing, and due to increased longevity in the general population, a twofold increase in AF is expected during the next decades.1 Thus, more knowledge on modifiable risk factors for prevention of AF is needed.

    Physical activity (PA) is recommended for health promotion and disease prevention,2 and it is well documented that PA is associated with reduced risk of cardiovascular disease including AF1 3 and all-cause mortality.4 Paradoxically, studies have reported that high amounts of vigorous exercise may attenuate the benefits of moderate PA, or even increase the risk of AF.5 6 Studies have demonstrated that the risk of AF increases with high levels of lifelong exercise, or participation in endurance sports,7 8 and that elite athletes more frequently experience AF than non-athletes.9

    Several studies have reported that left atrial (LA) enlargement is an independent risk factor for AF in the general population,8 10 11 and pathological conditions that increase LA size (eg, hypertension, valvular heart disease and heart failure) further increase the risk of AF.12 In addition to increased risk of AF, LA enlargement is a risk factor for stroke and all-cause mortality13 14 in the general population. Additionally, LA size increases with exercise,15 and studies have observed that LA size is larger in both athletes16 and in active adult and elderly individuals.17 Some elite athletes even have LA enlargement overlapping LA size seen in cardiac pathology.18 The mechanisms underlying the association between exercise and AF are not established, but it is suggested that the increased risk of AF with extensive endurance exercise may be linked to LA enlargement.19

    However, despite increased risk of AF with both LA enlargement and with vigorous exercise, convincing data linking the combination of exercise and LA size to AF are lacking and are largely speculative.19 20 Furthermore, studies have demonstrated that LA function is preserved,18 or even improved in athletes with LA enlargement.15 Also, LA enlargement has been reported in endurance athletes, without correlation with electrophysiologic remodelling.21 Thus, it is of importance to elucidate if LA enlargement is a benign physiological adaption of PA and exercise, or part of a pathophysiological mechanism increasing the risk of AF.

    Current knowledge of the relationship between exercise, LA remodelling and AF is mainly derived from studies of athletes. Thus, little is known about the role of moderate PA in the association between LA size and risk of AF in the general population. Therefore, our objective was to explore the associations between PA, LA size and incident risk of AF in a general adult and elderly population. Furthermore, we aimed to explore if PA attenuates the increased risk of AF seen with LA enlargement.

    Methods

    Study population

    The Tromsø Study is a single-centre population-based cohort study with seven repeated health surveys of the population of the Tromsø municipality, Norway.22 The present study includes participants from the fourth survey of the Tromsø Study (Tromsø4, 1994–1995), with 22 years follow-up for AF until 31 December 2016.

    In Tromsø4, all inhabitants ≥25 years were invited (n=37 558), with 27 158 men and women attending the first visit (77% attendance). Of these, all men aged 55–74 years, all women aged 50–74 years and 5%–8% random samples of the other age groups aged <85 years were invited to a second visit with extended examinations. Of these, a total of 7965 participants (76% of the 10 542 invited) attended the second visit. These participants were alternately allocated by computer to one of two lines of examination when attending the first visit, and 3287 participants in one of the lines were examined by echocardiography. These participants did not differ from the total sample attending the second visit.23

    In total, 2714 participants provided valid data on PA in combination with valid echocardiography data and status of myocardial infarction at baseline. We excluded participants with previous or present documented AF (n=45), valvular heart disease (n=27), left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction <40% (n=13), previous myocardial infarction (n=129) and LA below normal reference range (n=16) at baseline. Furthermore, one participant was excluded due to missing data on a covariate (systolic blood pressure). Finally, our analytical sample consisted of 2479 participants free from known cardiac pathology, with valid data on PA, AF, echocardiography and covariates at baseline (table 1).

    View this table:
    Table 1

    Baseline and follow-up characteristics stratified by PA: the Tromsø Study 1994–1995

    Assessment of PA

    PA was assessed by a validated questionnaire measuring duration of light and hard leisure time PA,24 which has been used in the Norwegian health surveys constituting The Cohort of Norway.25 The PA questionnaire was used to assess the weekly average hours with light (not sweating or out of breath) and hard leisure time PA (sweating/out of breath), respectively, over the last year. In this study, we used the question about hard PA in the main analyses: (1) 0 hours/week (inactive), (2) 0–1 hour/week (low), (3) 1–2 hours/week (moderate), (4) ≥3 hours/week (vigorous). Time spent going to/from work was considered as leisure-time PA. In some analyses, hard leisure-time PA is dichotomised into inactive (0 hours/week; option 1) and active (>0 hours/week; option 2–4).

    For sensitivity analysis, we combined questions about light and hard PA into five categories: (1) light and hard PA 0 hours/week (sedentary), (2) light PA >0 hours/week and hard PA 0 hours/week (inactive), (3) hard PA 0–1 hour/week (low), (4) hard PA 1–2 hours/week (moderate), (5) hard PA ≥3 hours/week (vigorous).

    Cardiac structure and function

    Echocardiography was performed by three medical doctors (one trained in echocardiography and two expert cardiologists), using a VingMed CFM 750 ultrasound scanner (VingMed Sound A/S, Horten, Norway). The echocardiographic assessment was performed with the use of standard imaging planes in a supine left lateral position. The echocardiographic assessment was performed online in one heart cycle, but remeasured if deviating from eye-balled estimates. Procedures and details of echocardiographic assessments in Tromsø4 are described elsewhere.23

    LA anteroposterior diameter was measured at the end of the LV systole by M-mode echocardiography in the parasternal short axis view at the aortic valve level, after alignment of LV in long axis view, using the leading edge-to-leading edge convention.26 LA diameter was indexed to body surface area27 and presented as centimetres per metre squared (cm/m2). LA diameter index was categorised into small (<1.5 cm/m2), normal (1.5–2.3 cm/m2) and enlarged (≥2.3 cm/m2).26 LV dimensions were measured at the end of diastole and systole, in the parasternal short axis view, after alignment of LV in long axis view to the leading edge-to-edge convention.26 LV ejection fraction was calculated by the Teichholz formula,28 using end-diastolic and end-systolic LV dimensions. LV myocardial mass was calculated according to the cube formula26 and further indexed to height raised to the allometric power of 2.7.29

    Valvular heart disease was defined by of the following criteria: (a) mitral stenosis identified by pulsed Doppler, (b) aortic stenosis (peak gradient >36 mm Hg) by continuous Doppler, (c) mitral regurgitation (regurgitant jet area >7 cm2) by two-dimensional colour Doppler imaging and/or (d) aortic regurgitation (vena contracta width >50% of LV outflow tract, or colour jet exceeding mitral valve coaptation point), by colour M-mode.

    A reproducibility study was performed by the two main observers in a subsample of 49 subjects.23 Intraobserver differences (mean±SD) for LV mass were 3.0±39.0 g and 7.0±25.5 g, respectively, whereas interobserver difference was 14.8±32.5 g.

    Covariates

    Baseline data from Tromsø4 include the following covariate extracted from self-reported questionnaires, physical examinations and blood samples: daily cigarette smoking (yes/no), coffee consumption (cups/day), diabetes (yes/no), use of antihypertensives (currently or previously/never), myocardial infarction (previously/no), stroke (previously/no), thyroid disease (yes/no) and palpitations (yes/no). Alcohol consumption was summarised from three questions reporting number of glasses of beer, wine or spirit normally consumed within a 14-day period.

    Heart rate and blood pressure were recorded three times with 1 min intervals after 2 min seated rest, by specially trained nurses using an automatic device (Dinamap Vital Signs 1846 monitor, Criticon, Florida). For resting heart rate, the lowest recorded reading was used. For blood pressure, the average from reading two and three was used. Blood pressure was classified into hypertension groups: (a) normotensive (systolic blood pressure <140 mm Hg, diastolic blood pressure <90 mm Hg and no self-reported use of antihypertensives), (b) hypertensive, controlled (systolic blood pressure <140 mm Hg, diastolic blood pressure <90 mm Hg and self-reported use of antihypertensives), (c) hypertensive, uncontrolled (systolic blood pressure ≥140 mm Hg and/or diastolic blood pressure ≥90 mm Hg and self-reported use of antihypertensives) or (d) hypertension, untreated (systolic blood pressure ≥140 mm Hg and/or diastolic blood pressure ≥90 mm Hg and no self-reported use of antihypertensives). Height and weight were measured with participants wearing light clothing and no shoes. Body mass index was calculated as weight (kg) divided by height squared (m2).

    Blood samples were analysed for total and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (mmol/L) and C-reactive protein (mg/L) at the Department of Clinical Chemistry, University Hospital of North Norway. Low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol was estimated by subtracting high-density lipoprotein cholesterol from total cholesterol.

    Follow-up and detection of AF

    The participants were followed from the date of examination in 1994–95 (Tromsø4), until (a) the date of first documented AF, (b) date of censoring due to death or migration or (c) end of follow-up on 31 December 2016, whichever came first.

    The follow-up data on AF were derived from the diagnosis registry of the University Hospital of North Norway, the only hospital in the region, by linking the hospital records of AF to the participants’ unique Norwegian national 11-digit identification number. Hospital records were searched for incident cases of AF confirmed by electrocardiography confirmation. Additionally, in participants with diagnoses of cerebrovascular or cardiovascular events, but without diagnosis of arrhythmias, hospital records were manually searched for notes on AF. Details of ascertainment of AF are described elsewhere.30 The events were evaluated and adjudicated by an independent expert endpoint committee. Postoperative AF within 28 days after surgery, myocardial infarction or other acute cardiac events, as well as AF documented the last week of life, were all classified as non-cases.

    Statistical methods

    Characteristics of the study population are presented as means with SD or percentages with number of observations (n). Associations between PA, LA size and AF risk were evaluated using univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression analyses. The associations are presented as HRs with 95% CI. The proportional hazard assumption was confirmed by visual inspection of log-minus-log plots. Model 1 was unadjusted, model 2 was adjusted for age, sex, body mass index and systolic blood pressure.

    To test the robustness of the fully adjusted model 2, we performed sensitivity analyses with additional covariates (smoking, coffee consumption, diabetes, LDL cholesterol, palpitations, LV myocardial mass index, thyroid disease, C reactive protein, alcohol consumption and resting heart rate) stepwise, or jointly, added to the model.

    In the fully adjusted model 2, we tested for possible interactions between PA*sex, PA*age, PA*hypertension groups, PA*body mass index and PA*LA size in a stepwise analysis of the association between PA and AF. We observed a significant interaction between PA*LA size (p=0.023), whereas no significant interactions were indicated for the other interaction terms (p>0.50). However, given previously reported age and sex differences in the association between PA and AF risk, we also stratified our main analyses by sex and age in addition to LA size.

    All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS V.26 (SPSS, Illinois, USA), with a two-sided p≤0.05 considered statistically significant.

    Results

    In total, 1181 men (57.7±10.7 years) and 1298 women (59.3±10.7 years), 25–83 years, were included in our analyses. Of these, 399 participants (214 men and 185 women) were diagnosed with AF during a mean follow-up of 16.6±6.6 years (median 20.2 years, IQR 11.6–21.9 years). Descriptive characteristics for the participants stratified by level of PA are presented in table 1.

    Overall, we observed 32% lower risk of AF in moderately active than in inactive participants (HRadjusted 0.68, 95% CI 0.50 to 0.93), and a U-shaped relationship was observed (table 2). Furthermore, participants with LA enlargement had 38% higher risk of AF compared with participants with normal LA size (HRadjusted 1.38, 95% CI 1.12 to 1.69).

    View this table:
    Table 2

    Association between PA and AF (HR ±95% CI): the Tromsø Study 1994–1995

    In analyses stratified by LA size (table 3), we observed that PA was associated with lower risk of AF in participants with LA enlargement only, but significantly reduced only in the low PA group (HRadjusted 0.41, 95% CI 0.22 to 0.77). Adjusted cumulative hazard for AF stratified by joint associations of PA and LA size is presented in figure 1. The increased AF risk with LA enlargement was attenuated by PA; compared with inactive participants with LA enlargement, the risk of AF was 45% lower among active with LA enlargement (HRadjusted 0.55, 95% CI 0.39 to 0.79). Furthermore, the risk of AF in active participants with LA enlargement did not differ from participants with normal LA size (online supplemental table S1).

    Figure 1
    Figure 1

    Adjusted cumulative hazard for AF by joint associations of PA and LA size with AF risk. Differences between groups are indicated with HR and 95% CI. The model is adjusted for age, sex, body mass index and systolic blood pressure. AF, atrial fibrillation, LA, left atrial/left atrium. The Tromsø Study 1994–1995.

    View this table:
    Table 3

    Associations between PA and AF stratified by LA size (HR ±95% CI): the Tromsø Study 1994–1995

    In sex stratified analyses, we observed 79% higher risk of AF in men than in women (HRadjusted 1.79, 95% CI 1.47 to 2.19) (online supplemental table S2). Adjusted cumulative hazard for AF stratified by joint associations of PA and LA size, and sex, is presented in figure 2. In both women and men, active participants with LA enlargement had the same risk of AF as participants with normal LA size (online supplemental table S2).

    Figure 2
    Figure 2

    Adjusted cumulative hazard for AF by joint associations of PA and LA size with AF risk, stratified by sex. Differences between groups are indicated with HR and 95% CI. The model is adjusted for age, body mass index and systolic blood pressure. AF, atrial fibrillation, LA, left atrial/left atrium. The Tromsø Study 1994–1995.

    When we stratified by age, participants ≥65 years had 2.6-fold higher risk of AF compared with participants <65 years (HRadjusted 2.59, 95% CI 2.09 to 3.20) (online supplemental table S3). Adjusted cumulative hazard for AF stratified by joint associations of PA and LA size, and age, is presented in figure 3. The risk of AF in active with LA enlargement was not higher in any age groups compared with participants with normal LA size (online supplemental table S3).

    Figure 3
    Figure 3

    Adjusted cumulative hazard for AF by joint associations of PA and LA size with AF risk, stratified by age. Differences between groups are indicated with HR and 95% CI. The model is adjusted for sex, body mass index and systolic blood pressure. AF, atrial fibrillation, LA, left atrial/left atrium. The Tromsø Study 1994–1995.

    Adjusted cumulative hazard for AF stratified by joint associations of PA, LA size and age, stratified by sex, is presented in online supplemental figure S1 and table S4). In general, men and women <65 years showed the lowest risk of AF compared with inactive ≥65 years with LA enlargement, which had the highest risk of AF. Moreover, in both men and women <65 years, the risk of AF was similar in active with LA enlargement as in those with normal LA size (online supplemental table S5).

    Sensitivity analysis

    When we combined questions about light and hard PA into five categories (online supplemental table S6), the association between PA and AF was similar as in the main analyses with four levels of hard PA (table 2). Furthermore, the association between PA and AF did not change when we replaced systolic blood pressure (model 2) with hypertension groups (online supplemental table S7, model 3). Similarly, the association between PA and AF did not differ from model two when additional covariates (smoking, coffee consumption, diabetes, LDL cholesterol, palpitations, LV myocardial mass index, thyroid disease, C-reactive protein, alcohol consumption or resting heart rate) were added (online supplemental table S8, Model 3).

    Discussion

    To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study that has analysed both PA and LA size jointly as risk factors for AF in a general population. The main findings from our study are that PA was associated with lower risk of AF in a U-shaped pattern, and the increased AF risk with LA enlargement was attenuated by PA. Furthermore, the risk of AF in active participants with LA enlargement did not differ from active with normal LA size. These patterns were observed in both men and women, and in participants over/under 65 years.

    Therefore, in our study of participants free from known cardiac pathology, LA enlargement does not represent increased risk of AF in physically active individuals. Furthermore, inclusion of several risk factors for AF in the analysis did not influence the associations between PA, LA size and AF.

    Physical activity, LA size and AF

    Overall, we observed 32% lower risk of AF in moderate active than in inactive participants, and a U-shaped association was seen between PA and risk of AF. The protective effect of PA on cardiovascular disease is well documented,31 and several studies support our observation that moderate doses of PA reduces the risk of AF.3 5 32 Also, our observation that the protective effect of PA on AF risk is offset by vigorous exercise, demonstrated by a U-shaped relationship, is consistent with previous studies.5 6 33 34 Furthermore, increased risk of AF is seen in endurance athletes,7 9 33 and with high levels of lifelong exercise.8 34 Our results showed that active participants had similar AF risk regardless of LA size, suggesting that LA enlargement in active individuals free from known cardiac pathology is not associated with increased risk of AF.

    To our knowledge, no previous studies have examined how the relationship between LA size and AF varies with PA, and if PA attenuates the risk of AF seen with LA enlargement, in the general population. Our results, that LA enlargement increases the risk of AF, are consistent with previous research in both the general population10 11 and in healthy middle-aged individuals.8 Furthermore, we observed that moderate PA attenuated the risk of AF in participants with LA enlargement, whereas PA did not attenuate the risk of AF in participants with normal LA size.

    The higher risk of AF observed in inactive with LA enlargement may be due to pathological conditions elevating chronic LA pressure and volume overload,12 for example, hypertension, LV diastolic dysfunction or heart failure, whereas the lower risk in active with LA enlargement may be due to the protective effect of moderate PA on modifiable cardiovascular risk factors.35 In our study, the participants were free from known cardiac pathology, which may explain why there was no beneficial association between PA and AF in participants with normal LA size.

    Atrial stretch in response to LA volume and pressure overload is a key stimulus for LA enlargement and may potentially induce release of factors leading to atrial myocyte hypertrophy, oxidative stress and fibrosis, which increases the risk of AF.12 35 Although we excluded participants with known cardiac pathology at baseline, it is likely that the increased risk of AF in inactive with LA enlargement is explained by undetected pathological conditions we could not control for. Therefore, the reduced risk in active with LA enlargement may be the sum of the protective effect of moderate PA, outweighing the potentially increased risk of LA enlargement. However, the lower risk of AF in active with LA enlargement persisted even when we adjusted for multiple cardiovascular risk factors in our sensitivity analysis.

    During vigorous exercise, atrial stretch may potentially release similar factors as in pathological conditions and thereby increase risk of AF,12 but an important difference between pathology and exercise is that the atrial pressure overload returns to normal when the exercise ceases.12 However, when repeated over time, and with insufficient recovery between exercise bouts, this may contribute to the increased risk of AF observed with high amounts of cumulative lifetime moderate-to-vigorous PA or exercise.8 34 35 Furthermore, it has been reported that male endurance athletes have a higher prevalence of masked hypertension (38%) than what is expected from the general population (8%–20%).36 Thus, masked hypertension might also explain the increased risk of AF associated with exercise.37 Other cardiac adaptations to vigorous exercise, associated with increased risk of AF, include increased vagal tone, resting bradycardia and electrical remodelling,5 35 which all may reduce atrial refractory period and facilitate re-entry.12

    Cardiac chamber enlargement is assumed to be a physiological and reversible adaptation to exercise training.35 This adaptation is expressed as the athlete’s heart35 and is adapted to perfectly match the supply to the demands of exercise.37 However, it is suggested that LA enlargement itself may be a substrate for AF in athletes,19 35 and, therefore, that the athlete’s heart may potentially be proarrhythmic independent of other abnormalities.37

    Interestingly, the pathophysiology seems to differ between ‘classical’ AF and exercise-related AF. AF is usually associated with high age, comorbidities and other risk factors.1 In contrast, people at risk of exercise-related AF are typically middle-aged men with athlete’s heart and high amounts of cumulative lifetime exercise.1 19 Moreover, this group typically has a lower prevalence of conventional risk factors for AF such as overweight and hypertension.1 However, little is known about the long-term risk associated with exercise-related AF,19 and longitudinal studies are needed to better understand the risk associated with exercise-related AF.

    Age and sex in the association between PA, LA size and AF

    It is well documented that increasing age is a prominent risk factor for AF, and that men have higher risk of AF than women.1 In the Framingham Heart Study, the authors demonstrated a linear association between increasing age and risk of AF, and participants aged 60–69 years had fivefold risk of AF compared with participants aged 50–59.38 Moreover, men had twofold incidence of AF compared with women.38 Furthermore, the association between vigorous PA and AF differs between sexes, and higher risk of AF is seen in men, whereas women have lower risk of AF with high amounts of vigorous PA.3 32 39

    In sex stratified analyses, we observed 79% higher risk of AF in men than in women, and when we stratified by age, participants ≥65 years had 2.6-fold higher risk of AF compared with participants <65 years. Furthermore, despite a higher overall risk of AF with LA enlargement, the risk of AF in active with LA enlargement was not higher in any sex, or age groups, compared with active participants with normal LA size.

    Strengths and limitations

    Our study has several strengths. First, the prospective design with a long follow-up period in combination with echocardiography data. Second, hospital-diagnosed AF confirmed by electrocardiography and validated by an independent expert endpoint committee. Third, the large number of participants, the high attendance and the large age span strengthen our generalisability to other Caucasian populations. Fourth, as the University Hospital of North Norway is the only hospital within a large geographical region, most hospital confirmed AF cases in our study population are likely uncovered. Finally, the broad diversity of covariates allowed us to adjust for multiple potential confounders.

    Our study has limitations that should be addressed. First, LA size was assessed by M-mode anteroposterior LA diameter, which is less accurate and have more geometrically assumptions than the recommended biplane calculated LA volume.26 However, a recent study demonstrated that anteroposterior LA diameter correlated well with LA volume (r=0.67), moreover, that there was high agreement (k=0.79) between LA volume and estimated LA volume by anteroposterior LA diameter in diagnosing LV diastolic dysfunction.40 Second, self-reported PA is prone to both recall and social desirability bias,41 although misclassification would probably have underestimated the true effects of PA. Third, as LA size was measured at baseline only, we cannot tell if the LA enlargement was due to exercise or pathology, or whether PA led to pathology and LA enlargement before baseline. However, the latter is less likely as we excluded all participants with present or previous known cardiac pathology, and we also adjusted for cardiovascular risk factors at baseline. Fourth, we cannot exclude residual confounding by measured or unmeasured variables (eg, masked hypertension, fibrosis or LA function). Finally, as AF was confirmed at the hospital, it is likely that some participants are misclassified as non-cases due to paroxysmal and/or silent AF that failed to be detected at examination. However, assuming that this misclassification is non-differential, the true AF prevalence may be higher than in our study, and the association between PA and AF is probably underestimated.

    In conclusion, our prospective study of participants free from known cardiac pathology suggests a U-shaped relationship between PA and AF. Moderate PA was associated with reduced risk of AF, whereas vigorous PA attenuated the protective effect of moderate PA. Moreover, PA attenuated the increased AF risk with LA enlargement in both men and women, and in participants over/under 65 years. We suggest that the protective effect of moderate PA outweighs the potential risk of AF with LA enlargement. Further research is warranted to clarify the association between LA enlargement and AF in relation to PA, preferably assessed with biplane-derived LA volume and objective measures of PA.

    Data availability statement

    Data may be obtained from a third party and are not publicly available. The legal restriction on data availability is set by the Tromsø Study Data and Publication Committee in order to control for data sharing, including publication of datasets with the potential of reverse identification of deidentified sensitive participant information. The data can, however, be made available from the Tromsø Study upon application to the Tromsø Study Data and Publication Committee. Contact information: The Tromsø Study, Department of Community Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, UiT The Arctic University of Norway; e-mail: tromsous@uit.no.

    Ethics statements

    Patient consent for publication

    Ethics approval

    This study involves human participants and was approved by Regional Committee for Medical and Health Research Ethics (20828/REK Nord). Participants gave informed consent to participate in the study before taking part.

    Acknowledgments

    We thank the participants in the Tromsø Study for their contribution.

    References

    1. ↵
      1. Hindricks G,
      2. Potpara T,
      3. Dagres N, et al
      . 2020 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European association for Cardio-Thoracic surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J 2021;42:373–498.doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa612
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    2. ↵
      1. Bull FC,
      2. Al-Ansari SS,
      3. Biddle S, et al
      . World Health organization 2020 guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behaviour. Br J Sports Med 2020;54:1451–62.doi:10.1136/bjsports-2020-102955pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33239350
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    3. ↵
      1. Elliott AD,
      2. Linz D,
      3. Mishima R, et al
      . Association between physical activity and risk of incident arrhythmias in 402 406 individuals: evidence from the UK Biobank cohort. Eur Heart J 2020;41:1479–86.doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehz897pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31951255
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    4. ↵
      1. Arem H,
      2. Moore SC,
      3. Patel A, et al
      . Leisure time physical activity and mortality: a detailed pooled analysis of the dose-response relationship. JAMA Intern Med 2015;175:959–67.doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.0533pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25844730
      OpenUrlPubMed
    5. ↵
      1. Morseth B,
      2. Graff-Iversen S,
      3. Jacobsen BK, et al
      . Physical activity, resting heart rate, and atrial fibrillation: the Tromsø study. Eur Heart J 2016;37:2307–13.doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehw059pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26966149
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    6. ↵
      1. Ricci C,
      2. Gervasi F,
      3. Gaeta M, et al
      . Physical activity volume in relation to risk of atrial fibrillation. A non-linear meta-regression analysis. Eur J Prev Cardiol 2018;25:857–66.doi:10.1177/2047487318768026pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29591534
      OpenUrlPubMed
    7. ↵
      1. Andersen K,
      2. Farahmand B,
      3. Ahlbom A, et al
      . Risk of arrhythmias in 52 755 long-distance cross-country skiers: a cohort study. Eur Heart J 2013;34:3624–31.doi:10.1093/eurheartj/eht188pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23756332
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    8. ↵
      1. Mont L,
      2. Tamborero D,
      3. Elosua R, et al
      . Physical activity, height, and left atrial size are independent risk factors for lone atrial fibrillation in middle-aged healthy individuals. Europace 2008;10:15–20.doi:10.1093/europace/eum263pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18178694
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    9. ↵
      1. Abdulla J,
      2. Nielsen JR
      . Is the risk of atrial fibrillation higher in athletes than in the general population? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Europace 2009;11:1156–9.doi:10.1093/europace/eup197pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19633305
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    10. ↵
      1. Tiwari S,
      2. Schirmer H,
      3. Jacobsen BK, et al
      . Association between diastolic dysfunction and future atrial fibrillation in the Tromsø study from 1994 to 2010. Heart 2015;101:1302–8.doi:10.1136/heartjnl-2015-307438pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25972269
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    11. ↵
      1. Psaty BM,
      2. Manolio TA,
      3. Kuller LH, et al
      . Incidence of and risk factors for atrial fibrillation in older adults. Circulation 1997;96:2455–61.doi:10.1161/01.CIR.96.7.2455pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9337224
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    12. ↵
      1. Chen YC,
      2. Voskoboinik A,
      3. Gerche AL, et al
      . Prevention of pathological atrial remodeling and atrial fibrillation: JACC state-of-the-art review. J Am Coll Cardiol 2021;77:2846–64.doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2021.04.012pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34082914
      OpenUrlPubMed
    13. ↵
      1. Bouzas-Mosquera A,
      2. Broullón FJ,
      3. Álvarez-García N, et al
      . Left atrial size and risk for all-cause mortality and ischemic stroke. CMAJ 2011;183:E657–64.doi:10.1503/cmaj.091688pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21609990
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    14. ↵
      1. Xu Y,
      2. Zhao L,
      3. Zhang L, et al
      . Left atrial enlargement and the risk of stroke: a meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. Front Neurol 2020;11:26. doi:10.3389/fneur.2020.00026pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32117002
      OpenUrlPubMed
    15. ↵
      1. Opondo MA,
      2. Aiad N,
      3. Cain MA, et al
      . Does high-intensity endurance training increase the risk of atrial fibrillation? Circulation 2018;11:e005598. doi:10.1161/CIRCEP.117.005598
    16. ↵
      1. Iskandar A,
      2. Mujtaba MT,
      3. Thompson PD
      . Left atrium size in elite athletes. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2015;8:753–62.doi:10.1016/j.jcmg.2014.12.032pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26093921
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    17. ↵
      1. Heitmann KA,
      2. Løchen M-L,
      3. Hopstock LA, et al
      . Cross-Sectional associations between accelerometry-measured physical activity, left atrial size, and indices of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction: the Tromsø study. Prev Med Rep 2021;21:101290.doi:10.1016/j.pmedr.2020.101290pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33425668
      OpenUrlPubMed
    18. ↵
      1. Gjerdalen GF,
      2. Hisdal J,
      3. Solberg EE, et al
      . Atrial size and function in athletes. Int J Sports Med 2015;36:1170–6.doi:10.1055/s-0035-1555780pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26509381
      OpenUrlPubMed
    19. ↵
      1. Sanchis-Gomar F,
      2. Perez-Quilis C,
      3. Lippi G, et al
      . Atrial fibrillation in highly trained endurance athletes - Description of a syndrome. Int J Cardiol 2017;226:11–20.doi:10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.10.047pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27776250
      OpenUrlPubMed
    20. ↵
      1. D'Ascenzi F,
      2. Cameli M,
      3. Ciccone MM, et al
      . The controversial relationship between exercise and atrial fibrillation: clinical studies and pathophysiological mechanisms. J Cardiovasc Med 2015;16:802–10.doi:10.2459/JCM.0000000000000211pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25469735
      OpenUrlPubMed
    21. ↵
      1. Wilhelm M,
      2. Roten L,
      3. Tanner H, et al
      . Atrial remodeling, autonomic tone, and lifetime training hours in nonelite athletes. Am J Cardiol 2011;108:580–5.doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2011.03.086pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21658663
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    22. ↵
      1. Jacobsen BK,
      2. Eggen AE,
      3. Mathiesen EB, et al
      . Cohort profile: the Tromso study. Int J Epidemiol 2012;41:961–7.doi:10.1093/ije/dyr049pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21422063
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    23. ↵
      1. Schirmer H,
      2. Lunde P,
      3. Rasmussen K
      . Prevalence of left ventricular hypertrophy in a general population; the Tromsø study. Eur Heart J 1999;20:429–38.doi:10.1053/euhj.1998.1314pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10213346
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    24. ↵
      1. Kurtze N,
      2. Rangul V,
      3. Hustvedt B-E, et al
      . Reliability and validity of self-reported physical activity in the Nord-Trøndelag health study (Hunt 2). Eur J Epidemiol 2007;22:379–87.doi:10.1007/s10654-007-9110-9pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17356925
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    25. ↵
      1. Norwegian Institute of Public Health
      . About CONOR - data from several regional health studies. In: Norwegian Institute of public health, 2016.
    26. ↵
      1. Lang RM,
      2. Badano LP,
      3. Mor-Avi V, et al
      . Recommendations for cardiac chamber quantification by echocardiography in adults: an update from the American Society of echocardiography and the European association of cardiovascular imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2015;28:e14:1–39. doi:10.1016/j.echo.2014.10.003pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25559473
      OpenUrlPubMed
    27. ↵
      1. Du Bois D,
      2. Du Bois EF
      . A formula to estimate the approximate surface area if height and weight be known. 1916. Nutrition 1989;5:303–11. discussion 312-3.pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2520314
      OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
    28. ↵
      1. Teichholz LE,
      2. Kreulen T,
      3. Herman MV, et al
      . Problems in echocardiographic volume determinations: echocardiographic-angiographic correlations in the presence of absence of asynergy. Am J Cardiol 1976;37:7–11.doi:10.1016/0002-9149(76)90491-4pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1244736
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    29. ↵
      1. Williams B,
      2. Mancia G,
      3. Spiering W, et al
      . Group ESD. 2018 ESC/ESH guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension: the task force for the management of arterial hypertension of the European Society of cardiology (ESC) and the European Society of hypertension (ESH). Eur Heart J 2018;39:3021–104.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    30. ↵
      1. Nyrnes A,
      2. Mathiesen EB,
      3. Njølstad I, et al
      . Palpitations are predictive of future atrial fibrillation. An 11-year follow-up of 22,815 men and women: the Tromsø study. Eur J Prev Cardiol 2013;20:729–36.doi:10.1177/2047487312446562pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22588086
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    31. ↵
      1. World Health Organization
      . WHO guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behaviour: web annex: evidence profiles. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2020.
    32. ↵
      1. Mohanty S,
      2. Mohanty P,
      3. Tamaki M, et al
      . Differential association of exercise intensity with risk of atrial fibrillation in men and women: evidence from a meta-analysis. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2016;27:1021–9.doi:10.1111/jce.13023pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27245609
      OpenUrlPubMed
    33. ↵
      1. Myrstad M,
      2. Løchen M-L,
      3. Graff-Iversen S, et al
      . Increased risk of atrial fibrillation among elderly Norwegian men with a history of long-term endurance sport practice. Scand J Med Sci Sports 2014;24:e238–44.doi:10.1111/sms.12150pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24256074
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    34. ↵
      1. Calvo N,
      2. Ramos P,
      3. Montserrat S, et al
      . Emerging risk factors and the dose-response relationship between physical activity and lone atrial fibrillation: a prospective case-control study. Europace 2016;18:57–63.doi:10.1093/europace/euv216pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26333377
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    35. ↵
      1. Morseth B,
      2. Løchen M-L,
      3. Ariansen I, et al
      . The ambiguity of physical activity, exercise and atrial fibrillation. Eur J Prev Cardiol 2018;25:624–36.doi:10.1177/2047487318754930pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29411631
      OpenUrlPubMed
    36. ↵
      1. Trachsel LD,
      2. Carlen F,
      3. Brugger N, et al
      . Masked hypertension and cardiac remodeling in middle-aged endurance athletes. J Hypertens 2015;33:1276–83.doi:10.1097/HJH.0000000000000558pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25668355
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    37. ↵
      1. Seccia TM,
      2. Calò LA
      . Is exercise becoming a danger for our health? the complex relationship between exercise and atrial fibrillation. Eur J Prev Cardiol 2018;25:621–3.doi:10.1177/2047487318762445pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29488811
      OpenUrlPubMed
    38. ↵
      1. Schnabel RB,
      2. Yin X,
      3. Gona P, et al
      . 50 year trends in atrial fibrillation prevalence, incidence, risk factors, and mortality in the Framingham heart study: a cohort study. Lancet 2015;386:154–62.doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61774-8pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25960110
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    39. ↵
      1. Zhu W-G,
      2. Wan R,
      3. Din Y, et al
      . Sex differences in the association between regular physical activity and incident atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis of 13 prospective studies. Clin Cardiol 2016;39:360–7.doi:10.1002/clc.22531pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26997209
      OpenUrlPubMed
    40. ↵
      1. Wang Y,
      2. Zhang L,
      3. Liu S, et al
      . Validation of evaluating left ventricular diastolic function with estimated left atrial volume from anteroposterior diameter. BMC Cardiovasc Disord 2021;21:110. doi:10.1186/s12872-021-01920-ypmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33622243
      OpenUrlPubMed
    41. ↵
      1. Prince SA,
      2. Adamo KB,
      3. Hamel ME, et al
      . A comparison of direct versus self-report measures for assessing physical activity in adults: a systematic review. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2008;5:56.doi:10.1186/1479-5868-5-56pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18990237
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed

    Supplementary materials

    • Supplementary Data

      This web only file has been produced by the BMJ Publishing Group from an electronic file supplied by the author(s) and has not been edited for content.

    Footnotes

    • Twitter @KimAHeitmann, @lailahopstock, @MorsethBente

    • Contributors All authors contributed to conception or design of the work. KAH, M-LL, HS, MS and BM contributed to acquisition, analysis or interpretation of the data. KAH drafted the manuscript. All authors critically revised the manuscript, gave final approval and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of work ensuring integrity and accuracy. KAH is responsible for the overall content as the guarantor.

    • Funding KAH was supported by the Northern Norway Regional Health Authority (grant number HNF1406-18).

    • Competing interests None declared.

    • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

    Linked Articles