Aims: Recently, a novel second-generation (G2) cryoballoon (CB) was introduced. Comparative analysis of lesion formation in terms of myocardial biomarker release [first-generation CB (G1) vs. G2] has not been studied. To compare myocardial biomarker release using the 28 mm G1 vs. G2 CB.
Methods and results: In patients (patients) treated with the simplified single big CB (SBCB) strategy for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI), myocardial biomarkers [troponin T (TnT), creatine kinase, lactic dehydrogenase (LDH)] were measured at 12, 24, and 48 h after PVI. Two groups were defined: Group 1 (G1; freezing time: 300 s), Group 2 (G2; freezing time: 240 s). Mean biomarker peak values were compared. To correct for between-group differences in cumulative freezing time, an index calculated as peak biomarker release divided by cumulative freezing time was calculated. Sixty-six CB PVI procedures (G1: 33 patients, G2: 33 patients) were analysed. Pulmonary vein isolation was achieved in all the patients using the simplified SBCB technique only. Mean freezing time (51 ± 10 vs. 33 ± 6 min, P < 0.01) was significantly shorter in G2. All biomarker levels tended to be higher in G2 vs. G1. The indexed biomarkers values were significantly higher in G2: TnT: 18.8 ± 8.5 vs. 32.3 ± 13.6 pg/L/min (P < 0.01); creatinephosphokinase: 6.7 ± 2.7 vs. 11.7 ± 3.9 U/L/min (P < 0.01); LDH: 5.2 ± 1.0 vs. 9.1 ± 2.7 U/L/min (P < 0.01). On a 6-month follow-up (180 days), G2 revealed a significantly higher success rate (20/33 vs. 28/33; P = 0.027).
Conclusion: Pulmonary vein isolation using the G2 CB increased the myocardial biomarker release index and is linked to a significantly improved 6 months success rate.
Keywords: Atrial fibrillation; Cardiac biomarker; Cryoablation.
Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author 2014. For permissions please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.