The Australasian Society of Cardiac and Thoracic Surgeons (ASCTS) have established a database for the collection and analysis of the results of cardiac surgery in Australia and New Zealand. Initially data has been collected only in Victoria public hospitals. This report covers the first 12 months of data collection from 1st August 2001 to 1st July 2002.
Background: Whilst cardiac surgical performance in Australia is considered to be of a high standard equivalent to other developed countries, there is currently no systematic approach to data collection in order to provide performance indicators and benchmarks. The development of an Australasian cardiac surgical database and performance indicators will enable benchmarking and comparison with international standards which should lead to performance improvements.
Methods: A database definition set and standardised data collection form was developed by the ASCTS for all participating cardiac surgery units in public hospitals in Victoria. Opt-off consent for subject inclusion in the database was approved by each participating institutional ethics review committee. An electronic database and reporting application was developed. Data included in this analysis is from the initial 12 months collection from all hospitals participating in the project from 1st August 2001 to 31st July 2002.
Results: Overall, there were 2982 procedures performed in this period of which 2969 had sufficient data to be included in this analysis (99.5%). The majority of procedures 2017 (68%) being undertaken were isolated coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG). The mean age of all subjects undergoing procedures was 65 years (range: 18-91 years) and 70% were male. 64% of all procedures were elective and 6.1% emergency or salvage. Median post-procedure length of hospital stay for all procedures was 6.0 days and intensive care unit (ICU) stay was 23.0h. Re-operation for haemorrhage occurred in 2.1% of all cases and deep sternal infection in 0.4% of all cases. Crude 30-day operative mortality was 3.6% for all procedures; 2.1% for isolated CABG, 3.6% for valve procedures, 5.2% for valve and CABG and 11.4% for other cardiac surgical procedures. Mortality rates increased from 1.8% for elective procedures to 4.1% for urgent and 24.6% for emergency or salvage operations. In comparison to international figures from the USA and UK, mortality rates following isolated CABG were lower whilst average length of hospital stay post-procedure was higher.
Conclusion: The ASCTS database project is now well established and the electronic database and reporting module is in operation in all participating sites. The risk-adjusted isolated operative mortality suggests cardiac surgical performance in Victoria compares well with international standards. As the database develops, local risk-adjustment models for mortality and morbidity for each procedure will be developed to enable appropriate between hospital comparisons.