pISSN 0513-5796   eISSN 1976-2437
Open Access, Peer-reviewed, Monthly
    Yonsei Med J. 2012 Jan;53(1):83-90. English.
    Published online Nov 30, 2011.
    https://doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2012.53.1.83
    © Copyright: Yonsei University College of Medicine 2012
    Original Article

    Early Experience Using a Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion Device in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation

    Yung Ly Kim,1 Boyoung Joung,1 Young Keun On,2 Chi Young Shim,1 Moon Hyoung Lee,1 Young-Hoon Kim,3 and Hui-Nam Pak1
      • 1Department of Cardiology, Yonsei University Health System, Seoul, Korea.
      • 2Department of Cardiology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Korea.
      • 3Department of Cardiology, Korea University Cardiovascular Center, Seoul, Korea.
    • Corresponding author: Dr. Hui-Nam Pak, Department of Cardiology, Yonsei University Health System, 50 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul 120-752, Korea. Tel: 82-2-2228-8459, Fax: 82-2-393-2041, Email: hnpak@yuhs.ac
    Received February 08, 2011; Revised March 25, 2011; Accepted March 28, 2011.

    This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

    Abstract

    Purpose

    Atrial fibrillation (AF) is one of the major risk factors for ischemic stroke, and 90% of thromboembolisms in these patients arise from the left atrial appendage (LAA). Recently, it has been documented that an LAA occlusion device (OD) is not inferior to warfarin therapy, and that it reduces mortality and risk of stroke in patients with AF.

    Materials and Methods

    We implanted LAA-ODs in 5 Korean patients (all male, 59.8±7.3 years old) with long-standing persistent AF or permanent AF via a percutaneous trans-septal approach.

    Results

    1) The major reasons for LAA-OD implantation were high risk of recurrent stroke (80%), labile international neutralizing ratio with hemorrhage (60%), and 3/5 (60%) patients had a past history of failed cardioversion for rhythm control. 2) The mean LA size was 51.3±5.0 mm and LAA size was 25.1×30.1 mm. We implanted the LAA-OD (28.8±3.4 mm device) successfully in all 5 patients with no complications. 3) After eight weeks of anticoagulation, all patients switched from warfarin to anti-platelet agent after confirmation of successful LAA occlusion by trans-esophageal echocardiography.

    Conclusion

    We report on our early experience with LAA-OD deployment in patients with 1) persistent or permanent AF who cannot tolerate anticoagulation despite significant risk of ischemic stroke, or 2) recurrent stroke in patients who are unable to maintain sinus rhythm.

    Keywords
    Atrial fibrillation; left atrial appendage; occlusion device; thromboembolism

    INTRODUCTION

    Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia disease; its prevalence has been known to be 1-2% in the general population1 and is expected to rise.2 Due to inefficient atrial contractions and tissue factors, patients with AF have an annual 6-10% risk of ischemic stroke, and the condition is responsible for 20% of ischemic strokes.3, 4 In patients with non-valvular AF, the vast majority of intra-cardiac thrombus are generated in the left atrial appendage (LAA), according to post-mortem and echocardiographic studies.5-7 Therefore, it has been established that appropriate anticoagulation is the best treatment for stroke prevention with mortality benefits in patients with AF.8, 9 However, anticoagulation with warfarin has many limitations, such as clinical under-utility,10, 11 difficulties in achieving optimal international neutralizing ratio (INR) values (64% in Rely, 63.8% in ACTIVE W),12, 13 pharmacokinetic interactions with other drugs, food, and a lifestyle that requires regular blood test monitoring.14 Warfarin has an annual 3-5% risk of major bleeding and still has a 1.4-1.6% risk of stroke during anticoagulation in patients with AF.12, 13 The rate of intracerebral hemorrhage has been found to be between 0.1% and 0.6% during warfarin monotherapy in contemporary reports, but the major bleeding risk increases dramatically to 7.4-10.3% when warfarin is combined with aspirin and clopidogrel.15 In contrast to the warfarin strategy, surgeons have been reducing the risk of stroke by excising the LAA during mitral valve surgery or coronary artery bypass surgery.16, 17 Recently, a PROTECT-AF investigation revealed the percutaneous mechanical occlusion of LAA not to be inferior to that of warfarin therapy.18 Therefore, percutaneous closure of the LAA might provide an alternative strategy to chronic warfarin therapy for stroke prophylaxis in patients with AF, especially to those who cannot tolerate warfarin or who have high risk of major bleeding. Here, we report our very early experiences with LAA occlusion devices in Korean patients with AF.

    MATERIALS AND METHODS

    Study population

    This study included patients with persistent or permanent AF who had a significant risk of stroke or could not tolerate warfarin therapy. Proper informed consent was obtained from all patients. The inclusion criteria were as follows: 1) permanent AF refractory to the electrical cardioversion, 2) persistent AF with failed maintenance of sinus rhythm with anti-arrhythmic drugs, 3) persistent AF and recurrent ischemic stroke despite proper anticoagulation, and 4) inability to tolerate warfarin due to adverse effects, labile INR, or recurrent hemorrhagic complications. We excluded patients with AF who were optimal candidates for rhythm control strategy, anticoagulation, or who were at low risk for ischemic stroke.

    Structure of the LAA occlusion device

    We used a WATCHMAN LAA occlusion device (Atritech, Plymouth, MN, USA) for LAA closure. The WATCHMAN device is composed of three parts as displayed in Fig. 1: 1) a delivery catheter (Fig. 1A, B and C), 2) a trans-septal capsheath (Fig. 1D), and 3) the WATCHMAN device (Fig. 1E and F). The trans-septal sheath guides the delivery catheter safely to the target site, and its depth in the LAA can be estimated under fluoroscopy by radio-opaque marker bands (Fig. 1D). The WATCHMAN device is folded inside the delivery catheter (Fig. 1B) and is designed to open like an umbrella in the LAA via plastic recoil (Fig. 1E) when the operator pulls back the delivery catheter, maintaining a fixed position of the deployment knob (Fig. 1C). The WATCHMAN device can be detached from the delivery sheath by screwing out the deployment knob, and it remains in the LAA. The WATCHMAN device is a self-expandable nitinol frame covered with a polyethyl terephthalate fabric cap. The fabric cap works as a filter with 160 µm-sized micro-pores. Five different diameters of WATCHMAN devices are currently available, depending on the size of the LAA (21, 24, 27, 30, and 33 mm).

    Fig. 1
    LAA occlusion device. (A, B and C) Delivery catheter (A) including folded WATCHMAN device inside the catheter lumen (B) connected to the deployment knob (C) and detachable by being unscrewed. (D) Trans-septal sheath has multiple radio-opaque marker bands that indicate the locations of delivery catheter and LAA ostium. (E and F) WATCHMAN device is unfolded by elastic recoil outside of delivery sheath (E) and remains in LAA after being detached from the delivery catheter (F). LAA, left atrial appendage.

    Implantation procedure of the LAA occlusion device

    Before the procedure, LAA size and shape were evaluated by trans-esophageal echocardiography (TEE; iE33, Philips Medical System, Andover, MA, USA). Anticoagulation therapy was maintained on the date of procedure and continued at least for 8 weeks after successful implantation of the LAA occlusion device. The procedure was performed under general anesthesia and using intra-procedural TEE guidance. The ostial size and depth of LAA were measured by intra-procedural TEE at the angles of 0°, 45°, 90°, and 135° (Fig. 2A, B and C), and decided the optimal WATCHMAN device diameter, which was 8-20% larger in size than the maximal LAA ostial size. We performed a trans-septal puncture with an 8 Fr Schwartz Left 1 sheath (St. Jude Medical Inc., Minnetonka, MN, USA) via the right femoral vein approach, and exchanged it with an 11 Fr trans-septal sheath (WATCHMAN Access system, Atritech, Plymouth, MN, USA) for the delivery catheter. Immediately after the trans-septal puncture, 150 U/kg of unfractionated heparin was administered intravenously, and activated clotting time (ACT) maintained at 300-350 sec. An LAA angiogram was taken at the right anterior oblique 45° with a pig-tail catheter (6Fr, A&A Medical Device Inc., Gyeonggi- do, Korea) inside the trans-septal sheath. The delivery catheter replaced a pig-tail catheter and was introduced into the trans-septal sheath in LAA. We lined up a distal radio-opaque marker band on the trans-septal sheath with the delivery catheter marker band, and a proximal marker band on the trans-septal sheath with ostium of LAA. After confirming the correct position via injection of contrast media, we deployed the WATCHMAN device by withdrawing the whole system (trans-septal sheath and delivery catheter together) slowly at the fixed position of the deployment knob. The WATCHMAN device is a self-expanding nickel titanium (nitinol) frame structure with fixation barbs and a permeable polyester fabric cover. After confirming secure capture of the device inside LAA via tug test and contrast injection, the device was disconnected from the deployment knob by being screwed out (Fig. 2C-F).

    Fig. 2
    Intra-procedural TEE images before (A, B and C) and after (D) deployment of LAA occlusion device. Diameter of LAA ostium and depth of LAA were measured from 4 different angles of TEE images to determine the appropriate size of WATCHMAN device. (D) Successful deployment of device should be confirmed using a tug test and color Doppler. (E) RAO 45° fluoroscopic view after deployment of WATCHMAN device. (F) Eight week follow-up 3-D TEE showed complete sealing off of LAA by WATCHMAN device. TEE, trans-esophageal echocardiography; LAA, left atrial appendage; RAO, right anterior oblique.

    Post-procedural follow-up

    After deployment of the WATCHMAN device, we stopped heparin and removed the sheath when ACT <250 sec. The patients were discharged the next day and maintained aspirin 100 mg and an optimal dose of warfarin (INR 2.0-3.0) for 8 weeks. TEE was repeated 8 weeks after the procedure, and we stopped warfarin and added clopidogrel 75 mg after confirming that there was no flow leakage between the WATCHMAN device and LAA.

    Data analysis

    We reviewed the reasons for deploying the LAA occlusion device, degrees of LA remodeling, CHADS2 score, shape and size of LAA, procedure time, adverse effects, and clinical outcome.

    RESULTS

    We implanted LAA occlusion devices in 5 patients with AF, and the characteristics of these patients are summarized in Table 1. The mean age of the patients was 59.8±7.3 years old, and all of them were male. The major reasons for LAA occlusion device implantation were high risk of recurrent stroke (80%) and labile INR with hemorrhage (60%); 3/5 (60%) patients had a history of failed cardioversion for rhythm control. The mean LA anterior posterior diameter was 51.3±5.0 mm and LAA size was 25.1×30.1 mm. We implanted LAA occlusion devices (28.8±3.4 mm device) successfully in all 5 patients without complications. The mean procedure time was 72.8±10.1 min. After 8 weeks of anticoagulation, all patients switched from warfarin to anti-platelet agent after confirmation of successful LAA occlusion by trans-esophageal echocardiography.

    Table 1
    Patient Characteristics

    Case 1

    A 53-year-old male taxi driver came to the emergency room after suddenly developing right-side motor weakness. His electrocardiography showed low voltage QRS with AF, and brain computed tomography revealed an embolic cerebral infarction in the region of the left side middle cerebral artery. He had a history of persistent AF lasting longer than 4 years and initially presented with symptomatic pericardial effusion. At that time, we could not find any pathology for pericardial effusion except for mediastinal lymphadenopathy and high adenosine deaminase level in the pericardial fluid. The mediastinal lymph node biopsy results indicated reactive hyperplasia. Anti-tuberculous medication was prescribed for one year under the impression that the patient had tuberculous pericarditis. However, he still had a mild degree of pericardial effusion, despite medication. His LA anterior posterior diameter measured by trans-thoracic echocardiography was 50.0 mm and his left ventricular ejection fraction was within the normal limits. To prevent ischemic stroke, anti-coagulation was maintained, but it was very hard to keep INR at the optimal level, despite strict drug and diet control. INR levels fluctuated remarkably, and the patient came to the emergency room several times due to severe bruising (Fig. 3). Because of labile INR with warfarin, we attempted rhythm control using cardioversion, but AF recurred very soon after cardioversion. We stopped warfarin and switched to clopidogrel; his CHADS2 score was 1 at that time. Unfortunately, this patient had an embolic stroke 9 months after switching to an anti-platelet agent. Fig. 3 displays the warfarin dosage and INR values. When he started anti-tuberculous medication, his INR level was sub-optimal despite a high warfarin dosage, but it rose after stopping rifampin and increased rather drastically, even with 0.5 mg of warfarin. After an ischemic stroke, the neurologist prescribed low-dosage warfarin, but the INR value increased to higher than 8.0. Therefore, we decided to implant an LAA closing device, and the procedure was successful, with no complications (Fig. 2D and F). Because the device was well-fitted within the LAA (Fig. 2E) and there was no flow leakage between the LAA and the WATCHMAN device, we stopped warfarin and switched to clopidogrel.

    Fig. 3
    Warfarin dosage and INR values of case 1. INR values were extremely labile, and ischemic stroke occurred 9 months after switching to clopidogrel. INR, international neutralizing ratio; MCA, middle cerebral artery.

    Case 2

    The second case was a 67-year-old male patient with hypertension and diabetes who had experienced an embolic stroke 3 years prior. Unfortunately, cerebral hemorrhage and optic nerve damage had occurred related to an adverse event of anticoagulation 2 years prior. Therefore, we switched from warfarin to aspirin and clopidogrel. However, the patient had another ischemic stroke again 7 months after starting the antiplatelet agent in place of warfarin. We decided to deploy the LAA occlusion device due to his recurrent strokes and high risk of bleeding with anticoagulation. The WATCHMAN device implantation was successful and we maintained warfarin for 8 weeks with very careful INR monitoring, and finally stopped anticoagulation after confirmation of no leakage with TEE.

    Cases 3 and 4

    Cases 3 and 4 had recurrent ischemic strokes and a large middle cerebral artery infarction, respectively (Table 1). The patients did not want continuous warfarin therapy because they had frequent minor bleeding despite optimal INR. Rhythm control with electrical cardioversion was attempted in both patients, but AF recurred within a week despite anti-arrhythmic drugs. Therefore, we successfully deployed a WATCHMAN device in each patient. The shape of the LAA in patient #4 was of the multi-lobulated Broccoli type, with a broad base and short length. In this type of LAA, the device was easily shifted or tilted to the dominant lobe of the LAA. Therefore, we repeated deployment and recapture of the device several times, and finally implanted a 30.0 mm sized device at the optimal site without complication. The eight week follow-up TEE showed successful implantation of the device in both patients, and so warfarin was switched to anti-platelet agent.

    Case 5

    Case #5 was a 67-year-old patient with permanent AF. Although his CHADS2 score was 1, his LA diameter was 60.0 mm and TEE showed severe spontaneous echo contrast. His INR value was very unstable and he experienced frequent purpura on his skin. Therefore, we successfully deployed the LAA occlusion device, and switched from warfarin to clopidogrel 8 weeks after implantation.

    DISCUSSION

    We report five cases of persistent or permanent AF that were successfully treated with LAA occlusion devices. None of the patients had been able to tolerate anticoagulation, despite significant risk of stroke because of labile INR or adverse hemorrhagic events. Three of them failed to maintain rhythm control after electrical cardioversion, and cardioversion was not attempted in two of them due to a huge atrium or to a high risk of bleeding with anticoagulation. Therefore, an LAA occlusion device might be considered for patients with persistent or permanent AF who cannot tolerate anticoagulation and cannot maintain sinus rhythm.

    Efficacy of LAA closure and ideal indications in patients with AF

    It is well established that more than 90% of atrial thrombi originate from the LAA,19 and the surgical MAZE procedure typically includes occlusion of the LAA. Current evidence regarding embolic risk reduction with percutaneous LAA occlusion is encouraging. There have been several trials evaluating less invasive LAA closure devices, such as thoracoscopic extracardiac obliteratin of LAA (LAPTONI)20 or percutaneous LAA transcatheter occlusion (PLAATO device)21 in order to prevent stroke in patients with AF, but the clinical outcomes were only partial successful. The percutaneous epicardial LAA suture ligation approach was also tested for pre-clinical feasibility.22 Recently, the PROTECT-AF trial, the largest-scale study to date, with 707 patients, showed that hemorrhagic stroke occurred less often with the WATCHMAN device than with warfarin treatment; stroke and all-cause mortality outcomes were non-inferior.18 The inclusion criteria were: patients aged >18 years old with paroxysmal, persistent, or permanent non-valvular AF and CHADS2 score ≥1. In the WATCHMAN group, the procedure success rate was 88%; 85% of them had stopped warfarin after 45 days and 92% after six months, if TEE showed residual peri-device flow jet <5 mm in width. Therefore, the WATCHMAN device is ideally indicated for patients with persistent or permanent AF who cannot tolerate anticoagulation despite a significant risk of ischemic or recurrent stroke, and who are unable to maintain sinus rhythm. If anticoagulation is contraindicated, the patient is not candidate for the WATCHMAN device, as the procedure requires that patients undergo anticoagulation for several weeks after deployment. It is not clear whether an LAA occlusion device can replace warfarin or rhythm control strategy in patients with AF; further study with a longer follow-up period is warranted.

    Potential complications of LAA occlusion device

    Although the PROTECT-AF trial showed the non-inferiority of the LAA occlusion device compared to warfarin (>99.9% with regard to any kind of stroke, cardiovascular or unexplained death, or systemic embolism within up to 3 years), procedure-related adverse events should be accounted for, such as cardiac tamponade (4.8%), device embolization or dislodgement (0.4%), procedure-related stroke (mostly air embolism 1.1%), or sepsis.18 However, Reddy, et al.23 recently reported that such adverse events were dependent on the level of experience of the operator. The subsequent registry after the PROTECT AF trial showed a significantly improved success rate of implantation (91.3% to 95.0%), and reduced procedure time as well as the occurrence of procedure- related adverse events (6.5% to 3.7%). The procedure-related stroke rate was reduced to 0%.

    Unsolved issue

    Long-term safety data for the WATCHMAN device are still unavailable and need to be taken into account for clinical consensus. Complex aortic plaque on the descending aorta is an independent risk factor for stroke in AF24 and the degree of electroanatomical remodeling of LA may affect the risk and event of stroke in patients with AF. The current guidelines recommend switching from warfarin to dural antiplatelet therapy 6-8 weeks after successful deployment of the LAA occlusion device.18 However, the risk of bleeding with dual anti-platelet therapy should be considered even after deployment of the LAA occlusion device. Theoretically, complete rhythm control might be better than an LAA occlusion device in terms of etiology of ischemic stroke and hemodynamics. Therefore, LAA occlusion devices should be compared with catheter ablation of AF or newly developed effective anti-arrhythmic drugs.25-27 Comparisons with direct thrombin or coagulation factor Xa inhibitors will be required.28 The clinical efficacy of newly designed LAA closure devices, such as the Amplatzer cardiac plug, need to be evaluated in a large randomized trial.29

    In conclusion, here we report our early experience with LAA-OD deployment in patients with 1) persistent or permanent AF who cannot tolerate anticoagulation despite significant risk of ischemic stroke or 2) recurrent stroke and inability to maintain sinus rhythm.

    Notes

    The authors have no financial conflicts of interest.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

    This work was supported by a grant (A085136) from the Korea Health 21 R&D Project, Ministry of Health and Welfare, and a grant (2010-0010537) from the Basic Science Research Program run by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF), which is funded by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology of the Republic of Korea. We also appreciate Mr. Soon Young Kwon's (Heart Pace Control Inc. Seoul) technical and moderating support.

    References

      1. Kannel WB, Abbott RD, Savage DD, McNamara PM. Epidemiologic features of chronic atrial fibrillation: the Framingham study. N Engl J Med 1982;306:1018–1022.
      1. Go AS, Hylek EM, Phillips KA, Chang Y, Henault LE, Selby JV, et al. Prevalence of diagnosed atrial fibrillation in adults: national implications for rhythm management and stroke prevention: the AnTicoagulation and Risk Factors in Atrial Fibrillation (ATRIA) Study. JAMA 2001;285:2370–2375.
      1. Wolf PA, Abbott RD, Kannel WB. Atrial fibrillation as an independent risk factor for stroke: the Framingham Study. Stroke 1991;22:983–988.
      1. Benjamin EJ, Wolf PA, D'Agostino RB, Silbershatz H, Kannel WB, Levy D. Impact of atrial fibrillation on the risk of death: the Framingham Heart Study. Circulation 1998;98:946–952.
      1. Stoddard MF, Dawkins PR, Prince CR, Ammash NM. Left atrial appendage thrombus is not uncommon in patients with acute atrial fibrillation and a recent embolic event: a transesophageal echocardiographic study. J Am Coll Cardiol 1995;25:452–459.
      1. Manning WJ, Weintraub RM, Waksmonski CA, Haering JM, Rooney PS, Maslow AD, et al. Accuracy of transesophageal echocardiography for identifying left atrial thrombi. A prospective, intraoperative study. Ann Intern Med 1995;123:817–822.
      1. Leung DY, Black IW, Cranney GB, Hopkins AP, Walsh WF. Prognostic implications of left atrial spontaneous echo contrast in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol 1994;24:755–762.
      1. Singer DE, Chang Y, Fang MC, Borowsky LH, Pomernacki NK, Udaltsova N, et al. The net clinical benefit of warfarin anticoagulation in atrial fibrillation. Ann Intern Med 2009;151:297–305.
      1. Corley SD, Epstein AE, DiMarco JP, Domanski MJ, Geller N, Greene HL, et al. Relationships between sinus rhythm, treatment, and survival in the Atrial Fibrillation Follow-Up Investigation of Rhythm Management (AFFIRM) Study. Circulation 2004;109:1509–1513.
      1. Petersen P, Boysen G, Godtfredsen J, Andersen ED, Andersen B. Placebo-controlled, randomised trial of warfarin and aspirin for prevention of thromboembolic complications in chronic atrial fibrillation. The Copenhagen AFASAK study. Lancet 1989;1:175–179.
      1. Hylek EM, D'Antonio J, Evans-Molina C, Shea C, Henault LE, Regan S. Translating the results of randomized trials into clinical practice: the challenge of warfarin candidacy among hospitalized elderly patients with atrial fibrillation. Stroke 2006;37:1075–1080.
      1. Connolly SJ, Ezekowitz MD, Yusuf S, Eikelboom J, Oldgren J, Parekh A, et al. Dabigatran versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 2009;361:1139–1151.
      1. Connolly S, Pogue J, Hart R, Pfeffer M, Hohnloser S, Chrolavicius S, et al. Clopidogrel plus aspirin versus oral anticoagulation for atrial fibrillation in the Atrial fibrillation Clopidogrel Trial with Irbesartan for prevention of Vascular Events (ACTIVE W): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2006;367:1903–1912.
      1. Go AS, Hylek EM, Borowsky LH, Phillips KA, Selby JV, Singer DE. Warfarin use among ambulatory patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation: the anticoagulation and risk factors in atrial fibrillation (ATRIA) study. Ann Intern Med 1999;131:927–934.
      1. Camm AJ, Kirchhof P, Lip GY, Schotten U, Savelieva I, Ernst S, et al. Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation: the Task Force for the Management of Atrial Fibrillation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Europace 2010;12:1360–1420.
      1. Bonow RO, Carabello BA, Chatterjee K, de Leon AC Jr, Faxon DP, Freed MD, et al. 2008 Focused update incorporated into the ACC/AHA 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 1998 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease): endorsed by the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Circulation 2008;118:e523–e661.
      1. Healey JS, Crystal E, Lamy A, Teoh K, Semelhago L, Hohnloser SH, et al. Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion Study (LAAOS): results of a randomized controlled pilot study of left atrial appendage occlusion during coronary bypass surgery in patients at risk for stroke. Am Heart J 2005;150:288–293.
      1. Holmes DR, Reddy VY, Turi ZG, Doshi SK, Sievert H, Buchbinder M, et al. Percutaneous closure of the left atrial appendage versus warfarin therapy for prevention of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation: a randomised non-inferiority trial. Lancet 2009;374:534–542.
      1. Hwang JJ, Ko FN, Li YH, Ma HM, Wu GJ, Chang H, et al. Clinical implications and factors related to left atrial spontaneous echo contrast in chronic nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Cardiology 1994;85:69–75.
      1. Blackshear JL, Johnson WD, Odell JA, Baker VS, Howard M, Pearce L, et al. Thoracoscopic extracardiac obliteration of the left atrial appendage for stroke risk reduction in atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003;42:1249–1252.
      1. Block PC, Burstein S, Casale PN, Kramer PH, Teirstein P, Williams DO, et al. Percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion for patients in atrial fibrillation suboptimal for warfarin therapy: 5-year results of the PLAATO (Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Transcatheter Occlusion) Study. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2009;2:594–600.
      1. Singh SM, Dukkipati SR, d'Avila A, Doshi SK, Reddy VY. Percutaneous left atrial appendage closure with an epicardial suture ligation approach: a prospective randomized pre-clinical feasibility study. Heart Rhythm 2010;7:370–376.
      1. Reddy VY, Holmes D, Doshi SK, Neuzil P, Kar S. Safety of percutaneous left atrial appendage closure: results from the Watchman Left Atrial Appendage System for Embolic Protection in Patients with AF (PROTECT AF) clinical trial and the Continued Access Registry. Circulation 2011;123:417–424.
      1. Lip GY, Lim HS. Atrial fibrillation and stroke prevention. Lancet Neurol 2007;6:981–993.
      1. Hohnloser SH, Crijns HJ, van Eickels M, Gaudin C, Page RL, Torp-Pedersen C, et al. Effect of dronedarone on cardiovascular events in atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 2009;360:668–678.
      1. Joung B, Chen PS, Lin SF. The role of the calcium and the voltage clocks in sinoatrial node dysfunction. Yonsei Med J 2011;52:211–219.
      1. Kim WH, Joung B, Shim J, Park JS, Hwang ES, Pak HN, et al. Long-term outcome of single-chamber atrial pacing compared with dual-chamber pacing in patients with sinus-node dysfunction and intact atrioventricular node conduction. Yonsei Med J 2010;51:832–837.
      1. ROCKET AF Study Investigators. Rivaroxaban-once daily, oral, direct factor Xa inhibition compared with vitamin K antagonism for prevention of stroke and Embolism Trial in Atrial Fibrillation: rationale and design of the ROCKET AF study. Am Heart J 2010;159:340–347.e1.
      1. Park JW, Bethencourt A, Sievert H, Santoro G, Meier B, Walsh K, et al. Left atrial appendage closure with Amplatzer cardiac plug in atrial fibrillation: initial European experience. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2011;77:700–706.
    Cited by
    Crossref 6
    Google Scholar 
    PubMed Central 5
    Scopus 7
    Web of Science 6
    MeSH Terms
    Septal Occluder Device*
    Aged
    Anticoagulants/contraindications
    Atrial Appendage/physiopathology*
    Atrial Fibrillation/epidemiology
    Atrial Fibrillation/physiopathology*
    Atrial Fibrillation/surgery*
    Humans
    Male
    Middle Aged
    Risk Factors
    Stroke/epidemiology
    Stroke/prevention & control*
    Treatment Outcome
    Warfarin/contraindications
    Metrics
    Share
    Links to
    Figures
    slide
    slide
    slide

    1 / 3

    Tables
    slide

    1 / 1

    PERMALINK