Skip to main content
Log in

Disparities in women’s referral to and enrollment in outpatient cardiac rehabilitation

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the predictors of referral and enrollment, including racial differences, in phase 2 cardiac rehabilitation programs among African-American and white women who are eligible for such programs.

DESIGN: Prospective longitudinal design.

SETTING: One large academic medical center and two large community hospitals.

PATIENTS: A total of 253 women (108 African American, 145 white) were surveyed within the first month of discharge from the hospital for a percutaneous coronary intervention, coronary artery bypass surgery, or myocardial infarction without revascularization. A total of 234 (99 African American, 135 white) completed the 6-month follow-up.

MAIN RESULTS: The rate of referral to outpatients phase 2 cardiac rehabilitation was significantly lower for African-American women compared with white women, 12 (12%) versus 33 (24%) (P=.03). Only 35 (15%) of women in the study reported enrollment in phase 2 cardiac rehabilitation programs, with fewer African-American women reporting enrollment compared with white women, 9 (9%) versus 26 (19%) (P=.03). Controlling for age, education, angina class, and comorbidities, women with annual incomes <$20,000 were 66% less likely to be referred to cardiac rehabilitation (P=.01) and 60% less likely to enroll compared to women with incomes >$20,000 (P=.01). Although borderline significant, African-American women were 55% less likely to be referred (P=.059) and 58% less likely to enroll (P=.059) than white women.

CONCLUSIONS: We found disparities in cardiac rehabilitation program participation, with women with lower incomes less likely to be referred and to have lower enrollment rates in cardiac rehabilitation and a strong trend for African-American women to be less likely to be referred and enroll. Because almost all patients who have had an acute coronary event, with or without revascularization procedures, will benefit from cardiac rehabilitation, automatic referral systems should be considered to increase utilization and reduce disparities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. 2003 Heart and Stroke Statistical Update. Dallas, Tex: American Heart Association; 2003.

  2. O’Connor GT, Buring JE, Yusuf S, et al. An overview of randomized trials of rehabilitation with exercise after myocardial infarction. Circulation. 1989;80:234–44.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Oldridge NB, Guyatt GH, Fischer ME, Rimm AA. Cardiac rehabilitation after myocardial infarction. Combined experience of randomized clinical trials. JAMA. 1988;260:945–50.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Ades PA, Waldmann ML, Polk DM, Coflesky JT. Referral patterns and exercise response in the rehabilitation of female coronary patients aged greater than or equal to 62 years. Am J Cardiol. 1992;69:1422–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Ades PA, Waldmann ML, McCann WJ, Weaver SO. Predictors of cardiac rehabilitation participation in older coronary patients. Arch Intern Med. 1992;152:1033–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Cannistra LB, Balady GJ, O’Malley CJ, Weiner DA, Ryan TJ. Comparison of the clinical profile and outcome of women and men in cardiac rehabilitation. Am J Cardiol. 1992;69:1274–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Oldridge NB. Compliance bias as a factor in longitudinal exercise research. Osteoporosis. Sports Med. 1992;13:78–85.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. King KM, Teo KK. Cardiac rehabilitation referral and attendance: not one and the same. Rehabil Nurs. 1998;23:246–51.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Wenger NK, Speroff L, Packard B. Cardiovascular health and disease in women. N Engl J Med. 1993;329:247–56.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Cannistra LB, O’Malley CJ, Balady GJ. Comparison of outcome of cardiac rehabilitation in black women and white women. Am J Cardiol. 1995;75:890–3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Thomas RJ, Miller NH, Lamendola C, et al. National Survey on Gender Differences in Cardiac Rehabilitation Programs. Patient characteristics and enrollment patterns. J Cardiopulm Rehabil. 1996;16:402–12.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Healthy People 2010: Understanding and Improving Health. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, Healthy People 2010; November 1, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  13. American College of Sports Medicine. ACSM’s Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription. 6th ed. Baltimore, Md: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  14. American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation. Guidelines for Cardiac Rehabilitation Programs. 3rd ed. Champaign, Ill: Human Kinetics; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Greene L, Kreuter M. Health Promotion Planning: An Educational and Environmental Approach. Mountain View, Calif: Mayfield publishing Company; 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Scott LA, Ben Or K, Allen JK. Why are women missing from outpatient cardiac rehabilitation programs? A review of multilevel factors affecting referral, enrollment, and completion. J Womens Health Gend Based Med. 2002;11:773–91.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Campeau L. Letter: grading of angina pectoris. Circulation. 1976;54:522–3.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40:373–83.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Jette AM, Davies AR, Cleary PD, et al. The Functional Status Questionnaire: reliability and validity when used in primary care. J Gen Intern Med. 1986;1:143–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Radloff LS. The CES-D Scale: A Self-report Depression Scale for Research in the General Population. Applied Psychological Measurement 1; 1977:385–401.

  21. Weissman MM, Sholomskas D, Pottenger M, Prusoff BA, Locke BZ. Assessing depressive symtoms in five psychiatric populations: a validation study. Am J Epidemiol. 1977;106:203–14.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Moore SM, Kramer FM. Women’s and men’s preferences for cardiac rehabilitation program features. J Cardiopulm Rehabil. 1996;16:163–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Caulin-Glaser T, Blum M, Schmeizl R, Prigerson HG, Zaret B, Mazure CM. Gender differences in referral to cardiac rehabilitation programs after revascularization. J Cardiopulm Rehabil. 2001;21:24–30.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Lieberman L, Meana M, Stewart D. Cardiac rehabilitation: gender differences in factors influencing participation. J Womens Health 1998;7:717–23.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Pasquali SK, Alexander KP, Coombs LP, Lytle BL, Peterson ED. Effect of cardiac rehabilitation on functional outcomes after coronary revascularization. Am Heart J. 2003;145:445–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Bariber K, Stommel M, Kroll J, Holmes-Rovner M, McIntosh B. Cardiac rehabilitation for community-based patients with myocardial infarction: factors predicting discharge recommendation and participation. J Clin Epidemiol. 2001;54:1025–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Bittner V, Sanderson B, Breland J, Green D. Referral patterns to a university-based cardiac rehabilitation program. Am J Cardiol. 1999;83:252–5, A5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Cooper AF, Jackson G, Weinman J, Horne R. Factors associated with cardiac rehabilitation attendance: a systematic review of the literature. Clin Rehabil. 2002;16:541–52.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Richardson LA, Buckenmeyer PJ, Bauman BD, Rosneck JS, Newman I, Josephson RA. Contemporary cardiac rehabilitation: patient characteristics and temporal trends over the past decade. J Cardiopulm Rehabil. 2000;20:57–64.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Frasure-Smith N, Lesperance F, Gravel G, et al. Social support, depression, and mortality during the first year after myocardial infarction. Circulation. 2000;101:1919–24.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Schulz R, Beach SR, Ives DG, Martire LM, Ariyo AA, Kop WJ. Association between depression and mortality in older adults: the Cardiovascular Health Study. Arch Intern Med. 2000;160:1761–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Ziegelstein RC, Fauerbach JA, Stevens SS, Romanelli J, Richter DP, Bush DE. Patients with depression are less likely to follow recommendations to reduce cardiac risk during recovery from a myocardial infarction. Arch Intern Med. 2000;160:1818–23.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. National Academy Press. Unequal Treatment: Confronting Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Health Care. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Jha AK, Varosy PD, Kanaya AM, et al. Differences in medical care and disease outcomes among black and white women with heart disease. Circulation. 2003;108:1089–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Schulman KA, Berlin JA, Harless W, et al. The effect of race and sex on physicians’ recommendations for cardiac catheterization. N Engl J Med. 1999;340:618–26.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jerilyn K. Allen RN, ScD, FAAN.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Allen, J.K., Scott, L.B., Stewart, K.J. et al. Disparities in women’s referral to and enrollment in outpatient cardiac rehabilitation. J GEN INTERN MED 19, 747–753 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.30300.x

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.30300.x

Key words

Navigation