ReviewsTranscatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI) in Patients With Bicuspid Aortic Valve Stenosis – Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Introduction
Percutaneous valve implantation technology was first introduced in 2000 [1], and led to the advent of the percutaneous transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) technique for aortic stenosis patients in 2002 [2]. Since then, leaps in technological advancements and robust randomised trials have reaffirmed the role of TAVI in patients deemed inoperable or at high surgical risk [3], [4], [5]. Recent evidence has supported TAVI as a safe and effective alternative treatment modality for severe aortic stenosis patients ineligible for conventional surgical aortic valve replacement [6]. However, there is limited evidence for the safety and efficacy of TAVI in patients with bicuspid aortic valves (BAV), the most common congenital valve abnormality occurring in 0.8-2% of patients [7], [8]. In randomised studies to date on TAVI, patients with BAV have been contraindicated regardless of transfemoral or transapical approaches. There are concerns surrounding the elliptical annular anatomy of BAVs which may predispose the patient to valve malfunction or malposition [9], [10]. Patients with BAV may also be at risk of incomplete sealing, severe paravalvular leak and aortic regurgitation [11], [12], [13]. Recent case reports and observational cohort studies suggest that TAVI in carefully selected patients with BAV may be feasible, safe and efficacious. A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted in order to assess the current evidence and relative merits of TAVI in aortic stenosis patients with BAV.
Section snippets
Literature Search Strategy
Electronic searches were performed using Ovid Medline, PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CCTR), Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR), ACP Journal Club, and Database of Abstracts of Review of Effectiveness (DARE) from their date of inception to January 2014. To achieve the maximum sensitivity of the search strategy, we combined the terms: “transcatheter aortic valve”, “TAVI”, “TAVR” and “bicuspid” as either key words or MeSH terms. The reference lists of all
Included Studies
A total of 1248 references were identified through six electronic database searches (Figure 1). After exclusion of duplicate or irrelevant references, 1222 potentially relevant articles were retrieved. After detailed evaluation of these articles, 30 studies remained for assessment. After applying the selection criteria, seven articles [12], [13], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20] were selected for qualitative and quantitative analysis. The study characteristics are summarised in Supplementary Table
Discussion
While bicuspid aortic valves is a congenital condition which occurs in approximately 1-2% of the general population, over 50% of resected aortic valves during surgical aortic valve replacement procedures have been observed to be bicuspid [21]. Over 33% of patients with bicuspid aortic valves will go on to develop complications [22], with some studies suggesting that the morbidity and mortality rates associated with BAV are greater than that of all other congenital heart defects combined [22],
Conflicts of interest
None declared.
Funding
None declared.
Acknowledgements
K.P. is supported by an Australian Postgraduate Award (APA) for postgraduate research studies.
References (28)
- et al.
Percutaneous replacement of pulmonary valve in a right-ventricle to pulmonary-artery prosthetic conduit with valve dysfunction
Lancet.
(2000) - et al.
Comparison of the hemodynamic performance of percutaneous and surgical bioprostheses for the treatment of severe aortic stenosis
Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
(2009) The congenitally bicuspid aortic valve. A study of 85 autopsy cases
The American Journal of Cardiology.
(1970)- et al.
Frequency of bicuspid aortic valve in young male conscripts by echocardiogram
The American Journal of Cardiology.
(2005) - et al.
Percutaneous transcatheter heart valve implantation in a bicuspid aortic valve
JACC Cardiovasc Interv.
(2010) - et al.
Bicuspid aortic valve disease
Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
(2010) - et al.
Comparison of the effectiveness of transcatheter aortic valve implantation in patients with stenotic bicuspid versus tricuspid aortic valves (from the German TAVI Registry)
The American Journal of Cardiology.
(2014) - et al.
Comparison of results of transcatheter aortic valve implantation in patients with severely stenotic bicuspid versus tricuspid or nonbicuspid valves
The American Journal of Cardiology.
(2014) - et al.
Comparison of one- and 12-month outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement in patients with severely stenotic bicuspid versus tricuspid aortic valves (results from a multicenter registry)
The American Journal of Cardiology.
(2014) - et al.
Feasibility and outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve implantation in high-risk patients with stenotic bicuspid aortic valves
The American Journal of Cardiology.
(2012)