Coronary artery disease
Endothelial Progenitor Cells, Microvascular Obstruction, and Left Ventricular Remodeling in Patients With ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2013.04.056Get rights and content

Endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) are released from the bone marrow during cardiac ischemic events, potentially influencing vascular and myocardial repair. We assessed the clinical and angiographic correlates of EPC mobilization at the time of primary percutaneous coronary intervention in 78 patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction and the impact of both baseline and follow-up EPC levels on left ventricular (LV) remodeling. Blood samples were drawn from the aorta and the culprit coronary artery for cytofluorimetric EPC detection (CD34+CD45dimKDR+ cells, in percentage of cytofluorimetric counts). Area at risk was assessed by Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation myocardial jeopardy index, thrombotic burden as thrombus score and microvascular obstruction (MVO) as a combination of ST segment resolution and myocardial blush grade. Echocardiographic evaluation of LV remodeling was performed at 1-year follow-up in 54 patients, whereas peripheral EPC levels were reassessed in 40 patients. EPC levels during primary percutaneous coronary intervention were significantly higher in intracoronary than in aortic blood (0.043% vs 0.0006%, p <0.001). Both intracoronary and aortic EPC were related to area at risk extent, to intracoronary thrombus score (p <0.001), and inversely to MVO (p = 0.001). Peripheral EPC levels at 1-year follow-up were lower in patients with LV remodeling than in those without (0.001% [0.001 to 0.002] vs 0.003% [0.002 to 0.010]; p = 0.01) and independently predicted absence of remodeling at multivariate analysis. In conclusion, a rapid intracoronary EPC recruitment takes place in the early phases of ST elevation myocardial infarction, possibly reflecting an attempted reparative response. The extent of this mobilization seems to be correlated to the area at risk and to the amount of MVO. Persistently low levels of EPC are associated to LV remodeling.

Section snippets

Methods

Seventy-eight consecutive patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction, treated with primary PCI with thrombus aspiration were prospectively enrolled from 170 primary PCIs performed in our institution during August 2009 to December 2010 (Supplementary Figure 1). All patients were admitted to our coronary care unit with chest pain, new persistent ST segment elevation, high-sensitivity cardiac Troponin T >0.0015 ng/ml, and/or new regional wall motion abnormalities.9 Exclusion criteria for all

Results

Clinical and angiographic characteristics of enrolled patients are listed in Table 1, Table 2, respectively.

EPC levels (percentage of cytofluorimetric events) were significantly higher in intracoronary than in aortic blood (0.043% [0.004 to 0.154] vs 0.006% [0.001 to 0.083], p <0.001; Figure 1). In contrast, intracoronary and aortic blood did not differ with regard to hematocrit (42.0% [31.5 to 43.8] vs 39.1% [33.5 to 41], p = 0.7) and total white blood cell count (11,260 n/μl [10,507 to

Discussion

In the present study, we demonstrate that, in patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction, CD34+CD45dimKDR+ progenitor cell levels, defined as EPC according to the recently modified International Society of Hematotherapy and Graft Engineering (ISHAGE) protocol,19 are significantly higher in blood samples collected from the infarct-related artery than in samples collected from the ascending aorta. Intracoronary and aortic EPC levels were related to the extension of angiographically assessed

Acknowledgment

The authors would like to thank all the members of the Coronary Care Unit and Catheterization Laboratory of the “Policlinico A. Gemelli.”

References (30)

  • L. Galiuto et al.

    The extent of microvascular damage during myocardial contrast echocardiography is superior to other known indexes of post-infarct reperfusion in predicting left ventricular remodeling: results of the multicenter AMICI study

    J Am Coll Cardiol

    (2008)
  • A.M. Leone et al.

    From bone marrow to the arterial wall: the ongoing tale of endothelial progenitor cells

    Eur Heart J

    (2009)
  • A.M. Leone et al.

    Mobilization of bone marrow-derived stem cells after myocardial infarction and left ventricular function

    Eur Heart J

    (2005)
  • R. Wyderka et al.

    Mobilization of CD34+CXCR4+ stem/progenitor cells and the parameters of left ventricular function and remodeling in 1-year follow-up of patients with acute myocardial infarction

    Mediators Inflamm

    (2012)
  • W. Wojakowski et al.

    Mobilization of CD34(+), CD117(+), CXCR4(+), c-met(+) stem cells is correlated with left ventricular ejection fraction and plasma NT-proBNP levels in patients with acute myocardial infarction

    Eur Heart J

    (2006)
  • Cited by (12)

    • Imbalance between the circulating endothelium-derived apoptotic microparticles and the endothelial colony-forming units of progenitor cells in patients undergoing diagnostic coronary angiography

      2021, Advances in Medical Sciences
      Citation Excerpt :

      Circulating EPCs play an important role in endothelial repair and regeneration [35]. The presence of colony-forming units of EPCs or high circulating levels of these progenitor cells is associated with reduced microvascular obstruction after AMI, leading to lower left ventricular remodeling [36,37]. Conversely, an inverse correlation between EPCs and several risk factors for CAD has been described [12,19,38,39].

    • Dual role of circulating endothelial progenitor cells in stent struts endothelialisation and neointimal regrowth: A substudy of the IN-PACT CORO trial

      2015, Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine
      Citation Excerpt :

      Initial evidence from our group, however, support the potential application of at least one type of DCB to a subset of de novo lesions [10]. Endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) are bone marrow derived elements with homeostatic and reparative properties [11], increased in the blood of patients with acute ST elevation myocardial infarction and linked to reduced left ventricular remodelling [12]. EPCs have also been controversially invoked to explain stent endothelialisation, as the regeneration of endothelium is considered to involve either EPC homing from blood flow at the site of injury, or endothelium regrowth from both sides of the stented part of the vessel [13].

    • Improving cardiovascular outcomes in rheumatic diseases: Therapeutic potential of circulating endothelial progenitor cells

      2014, Pharmacology and Therapeutics
      Citation Excerpt :

      In the acute stages following MI, there is a marked release of CD34+/CD45dim/KDR+ cells into the coronary circulation compared to the peripheral circulation. The number of these cells correlates with the size of the infarct (Porto et al., 2013). The stimulus for this release after vascular injury remains unknown, but is unlikely to be due to a systemic inflammation as bacterial antigens induce an acute inflammatory response but not the mobilisation of either CD34+/KDR+ or CD34+/CD133+/KDR+ cells.

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    This study was supported by grant from the Fondazione Cassa di Risparmio di Roma (Rome, Italy) to UNICATT Cord Blood Bank of the Catholic University of the Sacred Heart of Rome.

    See page 790 for disclosure information.

    View full text