Heart failure
Comparison of Cardiac Power Output and Exercise Performance in Patients With Left Ventricular Assist Devices, Explanted (Recovered) Patients, and Those With Moderate to Severe Heart Failure

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2010.01.362Get rights and content

Peak cardiac power output (CPO), as a direct measurement of overall cardiac function, has been shown to be a most powerful predictor of prognosis for patients with chronic heart failure. The present study assessed CPO and exercise performance in patients implanted with a left ventricular assist device (LVAD), those explanted due to myocardial recovery, and those with moderate to severe heart failure. Hemodynamic and respiratory gas exchange measurements were undertaken at rest and at peak graded exercise. These were performed in 54 patients—20 with moderate to severe heart failure, 18 with implanted LVADs, and 16 with explanted LVADs. At rest there was a nonsignificant difference in CPO among groups (p >0.05). Peak CPO was significantly higher in the explanted LVAD than in the heart failure and implanted LVAD groups (heart failure 1.90 ± 0.45 W, implanted LVAD 2.37 ± 0.55 W, explanted LVAD 3.39 ± 0.61 W, p <0.01) as was peak cardiac output (heart failure 9.1 ± 2.1 L/min, implanted LVAD 12.4 ± 2.2 L/min, explanted LVD 14.6 ± 2.9 L/min, p <0.01). Peak oxygen consumption was higher in the explanted LVAD than in the heart failure and implanted LVAD groups (heart failure 15.8 ± 4.1 ml/kg/min, implanted LVAD 19.8 ± 5.8 ml/kg/min, explanted LVAD 28.2 ± 5.0 ml/kg/min, p <0.05) as was anaerobic threshold (heart failure 11.2 ± 1.9 ml/kg/min, implanted LVAD 14.7 ± 4.9 ml/kg/min, explanted LVAD 21.4 ± 5.0 ml/kg/min, p <0.05). In conclusion, peak CPO differentiates well during cardiac restoration using LVADs and emphasizes the benefits of this therapy. CPO has the potential to be a key physiologic marker of heart failure severity and can guide management of patients with LVAD.

Section snippets

Methods

The study population consisted of 54 men who attended cardiopulmonary exercise testing at Harefield Hospital (Harefield, United Kingdom). Data were collected from August 2006 to May 2008. Exclusion criteria included inability to perform treadmill exercise tests, inability to exercise beyond anaerobic threshold, symptomatic angina limiting exercise, and unwillingness to provide a consent form. Of the 54 patients recruited, 20 had moderate to severe heart failure, 18 have implanted LVADs, and 16

Results

There were nonsignificant differences in age, body weight, and height in patients with moderate to severe heart failure, those with implanted LVADs, and those with explanted LVADs (p >0.05).

CPO at rest was not significantly different among groups with heart failure, implanted LVAD, and explanted LVAD (p >0.05). At peak exercise, CPO in patients with implanted LVADs and those with explanted LVADs was significantly higher compared to those with heart failure (p <0.01; Figure 1). Mean physiologic

Discussion

To our knowledge, the present study is the first to evaluate power-generating capacity of the heart in patients with implanted LVADs and those with explanted LVADs. The major findings of this study suggest that peak CPO and exercise performance were significantly higher in patients with explanted LVADs than in patients with moderate to severe heart failure and those with implanted LVADs.

Peak CPO and physiologic cardiac reserve of patients with explanted LVADs were similar to those in patients

References (30)

  • L.B. Tan

    Evaluation of cardiac dysfunction, cardiac reserve and inotropic response

    Postgrad Med J

    (1991)
  • E.J. Birks et al.

    Left ventricular assist device and drug therapy for the reversal of heart failure

    N Engl J Med

    (2006)
  • D.G. Jakovljevic et al.

    Comparison of cardiac output determined by different rebreathing methods at rest and at peak exercise

    Eur J Appl Physiol

    (2008)
  • G.A. Borg

    Psychophysical bases of perceived exertion

    Med Sci Sports Exerc

    (1982)
  • W.L. Beaver et al.

    A new method for detecting anaerobic threshold by gas exchange

    J Appl Physiol

    (1986)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text