Clinical InvestigationValvular and Congenital Heart DiseaseDifferential effects of afterload on left ventricular long- and short-axis function: Insights from a clinical model of patients with aortic valve stenosis undergoing aortic valve replacement
Section snippets
Study population
A total of 181 patients underwent AVR between January 2004 and December 2007 at our institution. Of these, 50 patients fulfilled the following criteria: (1) available echocardiographic studies before and early post-AVR in digital imaging and communications in medicine (DICOM) format; (2) normal baseline LVEF (≥ 55%), without segmental wall motion abnormalities; and (3) no other significant valvular heart disease. In 5 patients, echocardiographic studies did not meet the threshold criteria for
Baseline demographics and conventional echo-Doppler measurements
Patients' demographic characteristics were similar to normal controls (Table I). Conventional echocardiography demonstrated larger systolic and diastolic LV dimensions and LV hypertrophy at baseline in AS compared to controls. Both groups had normal LVEF. Left atrial (LA) size was similar in both groups. Estimated right ventricular systolic pressure was higher in patients with AS. Severe AS was demonstrated in all patients with a mean aortic valve area indexed for body surface area of 0.4 ± 0.1
Longitudinal and circumferential mechanics of severe AS
Myocardial systolic function is usually assessed by LVEF. Although this is clinically useful in patients with AS, symptoms start when ejection fraction (EF) is still normal. An abnormal EF is a late consequence and likely represents failure of compensatory mechanisms. Newer quantitative techniques such as speckle tracking myocardial mechanics evaluating strain, SR, and twist have been used to better characterize regional and global myocardial systolic and diastolic function and detect subtle
Conclusions
Patients with severe AS undergoing AVR provide a clinical model of the effects of afterload on LV function. The LV compensates by increased apical rotation as well as changing the strain vector of systolic function, maintaining its magnitude by increased circumferential strain compensating for decreased longitudinal strain. After AVR and relief of afterload, there is a gradual improvement in mechanics and resolution of compensatory mechanisms. Abnormal apical mechanics may be a key to the
References (22)
- et al.
Impact of left ventricular loading conditions on myocardial deformation parameters: analysis of early and late changes of myocardial deformation parameters after aortic valve replacement
J Am Soc Echocardiogr
(2007) - et al.
Acute improvement in myocardial function assessed by myocardial strain and strain rate after aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis
J Am Soc Echocardiogr
(2006) - et al.
Recovery of left ventricular systolic longitudinal strain after valve replacement in aortic stenosis and relation to natriuretic peptides
J Am Soc Echocardiogr.
(2007) - et al.
Two-dimensional strain—a novel software for real-time quantitative echocardiographic assessment of myocardial function
J Am Soc Echocardiogr
(2004) - et al.
Non-Doppler two-dimensional strain imaging by echocardiography—from technical considerations to clinical applications
J Am Soc Echocardiogr
(2007) - et al.
A novel feature-tracking echocardiographic method for the quantitation of regional myocardial function: validation in an animal model of ischemia-reperfusion
J Am Coll Cardiol
(2008) - et al.
Systolic myocardial mechanics in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: novel concepts and implications for clinical status
J Am Soc Echocardiogr
(2008) - et al.
Myocardial mechanics explains the time course of benefit for septal ethanol ablation for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
J Am Soc Echocardiogr
(2008) - et al.
Recommendations for chamber quantification: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography's Guidelines and Standards Committee and the Chamber Quantification Writing Group
J Am Soc Echocardiogr.
(2005) - et al.
Recommendations for Quantification of Doppler Echocardiography: a report from the Doppler Quantification Task Force of the Nomenclature and Standards Committee of the American Society of Echocardiography
J Am Soc Echocardiogr
(2002)
Normal values for Doppler echocardiographic assessment of heart valve prostheses
J Am Soc Echocardiogr
Cited by (72)
Relevance of Functional Mitral Regurgitation in Aortic Valve Stenosis
2020, American Journal of CardiologyRelative Contribution of Afterload and Interstitial Fibrosis to Myocardial Function in Severe Aortic Stenosis
2020, JACC: Cardiovascular ImagingUse of “speckle tracking” in non-cancer patients
2019, Revista Colombiana de CardiologiaAlterations in Layer-Specific Left Ventricular Global Longitudinal and Circumferential Strain in Patients With Aortic Stenosis: A Comparison of Aortic Valve Replacement versus Conservative Management Over a 12-Month Period
2019, Journal of the American Society of EchocardiographyDifferential Myocardial Fibre Involvement by Strain Analysis in Patients With Aortic Stenosis
2018, Heart Lung and CirculationCitation Excerpt :In contrast, LV strain and strain rate analysis are more sensitive indices of subclinical myocardial involvement. Recent studies have shown abnormal LV strain mechanics despite preserved LVEF in patients with AS [3,4]. Myocardial architecture is a complex array of longitudinally and circumferentially orientated fibres, predominantly organised in subendocardial and subepicardial layers, respectively [5].