Echocardiography in Serial Evaluation of Left Ventricular Systolic and Diastolic Function: Importance of Image Acquisition, Quantitation, and Physiologic Variability in Clinical and Investigational Applications

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0894-7317(14)80020-5Get rights and content

Quantitative echocardiography is frequently used for serial evaluation of left ventricular performance. This prospective study was designed to determine the extent to which the acts of image acquisition and quantitation, and the subjects themselves, affect total variability in two-dimensional and Doppler echocardiographic indexes of left ventricular morphology and performance. Therefore, two technicians and two readers acquired and analyzed 60 echocardiograms from 15 normal subjects, each of whom was studied four times (twice on each of two visits). Analysis of variance based on generalizability theory was used to estimate the magnitude of these variability sources by calculating standard deviations (SD) and used to estimate their contribution to total variability. Of the two-dimensional echocardiographic indexes tested, ejection fraction varied least (SD, 6.6%) and left ventricular mass varied most (SD, 35.3 gm). Of the Doppler indexes, normalized early diastolic filling velocity integral varied least (SD, 8.4%) and deceleration time varied most (SD, 48.6 msec). Technical (image acquisition and quantitation) variability contributed most (and subject variability least) to total variability of stroke volume (68%) and deceleration time (67%). Technical variability contributed least (and subject variability most) to variability of ejection fraction (43%) and diastolic filling time (25%). The acts of image acquisition and quantitation varied more between than within technicians and readers. Peak atrial filling velocity and the ratio of peak early to atrial filling velocity significantly differed between technicians. Left ventricular ejection fraction, left ventricular mass, peak atrial filling velocity, early filling integral, and deceleration of early filling differed significantly between readers. Therefore the acts of image acquisition and quantitation, and subject variability itself, all contribute to total variability in echocardiographic indexes. Changes seen on clinical studies should be interpreted as abnormal only when exceeding the total variability originating from these sources. Generalizabi 'ty theory allows one to tailor strategies to reduce variability. These strategies include increasing the number of observations, readers, and technicians for any given ā€œbaselineā€ study and using the same readers and technicians for sequential follow-up studies.

References (42)

  • D Wahr et al.

    Left ventricular volumes determined by two-dimensional echocardiography in a normal adult population

    J Am Coll Cardiol

    (1983)
  • BF Byrd et al.

    Left ventricular mass and volume/mass ratio determined by twodimensional echocardiography in normal adults

    J Am Coll Cardiol

    (1985)
  • JM Bland et al.

    Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement

    Lancet

    (1986)
  • DF Ettles et al.

    Reproducibility and persistence of abnormal transmitral flow velocity patterns detected by pulsed Doppler ultrasound

    Int J Cardiol

    (1988)
  • C Pollick et al.

    Variability of digitized echocardiography. Size, source, and means of reduction

    Am J Cardiol

    (1983)
  • P Cohn et al.

    Left ventricular ejection fraction as a prognostic guide in surgical treatment of coronary and valvular heart disease

    Am J Cardiol

    (1974)
  • J Ross

    Afterload mismatch in aortic and mitral valve disease: implications for surgical therapy

    J Am Coll Cardiol

    (1985)
  • M Iwase et al.

    Effects of diltiazem on left ventricular diastolic behavior in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: eval uation with exercise pulsed Doppler echocardiography

    J Am Coll Cardiol

    (1987)
  • AN DeMaria et al.

    Identification and treatment of diastolic dysfunction: role of transmitral Doppler recordings

    J Am Coll Cardiol

    (1987)
  • RA Nishimura et al.

    Assessment of diastolic function of the heart: background and current applications of Doppler echocardiography. Part II. Clinical Studies

    Mayo Clin Proc

    (1989)
  • H Kuecherer et al.

    Determinations of left ventricular filling parameters by pulsed Doppler echocardiography: a noninvasive method to predict high filling pres sures in patients with coronary artery disease.

    Am Heart J

    (1988)
  • Cited by (107)

    • Effect of endurance training on the determinants of peak exercise oxygen consumption in elderly patients with stable compensated heart failure and preserved ejection fraction

      2012, Journal of the American College of Cardiology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Left ventricular end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes were calculated using the single plane ellipsoid apical 4-chamber area-length method (30,31) by a second experienced echosonographer who did not participate in image acquisition and who was blinded to the subject's randomization group allocation (31). Adequate images for evaluation of LV volumes were defined as a well-aligned LV without apical foreshortening and with the ventricular endocardial contours well visualized for tracing (30,32). All results were averaged from 3 single-beat digital cineloops (4,13).

    • Exercise physiology of the left atrium: Quantity and timing of contribution to cardiac output

      2021, American Journal of Physiology - Heart and Circulatory Physiology
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Presented in part at the Sixty-second Scientific Sessions of the American Heart Association, New Orleans, Louisiana, November 1989.

    Supported in part by a grant (I-ROI-HL-41495-01) from the National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.

    a

    Supported by grant 6442-1 from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Bonn, Germany.

    View full text