Effects on quality of life, symptoms and daily activity 6 months after termination of an exercise training programme in heart failure patients

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-5273(00)00383-1Get rights and content

Abstract

Background: Exercise training in heart failure patients improves exercise capacity, physical function, and quality-of-life. Prior studies indicate a rapid loss of these effects following termination of the training. We wanted to assess any sustained post-training effects on patients global assessment of change in quality-of-life (PGACQoL) and physical function. Methods: Fifty-four stable heart failure patients were randomised to exercise or control. The 4-month exercise programme consisted of bicycle training at 80% of maximal intensity three times/week, and 49 patients completed the active study period. At 10 months (6 months post training) 37 patients were assessed regarding PGACQoL, habitual physical activity, and dyspnea-fatigue-index. Results: Both post-training patients (n=17) and controls (n=20) deteriorated PGACQoL during the 6-month extended follow-up, although insignificantly. However, post-training patients improved PGACQoL slightly but significantly from baseline to 10 months (P=0.006), differing significantly (P=0.023) from controls who were unchanged. Regarding dyspnea-fatigue-index, post-training patients were largely unchanged and controls deteriorated insignificantly, during the extended follow-up as well as from baseline to 10 months. Both groups decreased physical activity insignificantly during the extended follow-up, and from baseline to 10 months post-training patients tended to decrease whereas controls significantly (P=0.007) decreased physical activity. Conclusion: There was no important sustained benefit 6 months after termination of an exercise training programme in heart failure patients. A small, probably clinically insignificant sustained improvement in PGACQoL was seen in post-training patients. Controls significantly decreased the habitual physical activity over 10 months and post-training patients showed a similar trend. Exercise training obviously has to be continuing to result in sustained benefit.

Introduction

Several studies have shown beneficial effects of physical endurance training in patients with depressed left ventricular function and/or clinical heart failure [1], [2]. Benefit has been shown in terms of exercise capacity, oxygen uptake, ability to carry out daily activities, quality of life, and left ventricular function [1], [2]. The effects have been found to be due mainly to improved peripheral muscular function and improved autonomic balance/reduced sympathetic activation, and are largely independent of central hemodynamics [1], [2]. It seems, however, that there is quite rapid deterioration following discontinuation of the exercise training [1], [2], indicating that the training must be continued in order to obtain sustained beneficial effects. It is not known if patients who have participated in a training programme will spontaneously continue to carry out exercise training or increase their level of physical activity long-term (i.e. 6 months) after discontinuing the formal training programme. Neither is it known if controls will pick up the exercise training or change their physical activity after having participated in such a study.

In a study of 49 patients with symptomatic heart failure we showed that a 16-week physical exercise training programme improved patients global assessment of change in quality of life (PGACQoL) and maximum exercise capacity [3]. After completion of the active study period the patients were followed for an additional 6 months, at the end of which they were interviewed regarding PGACQoL, habitual physical activity, and ability to carry out daily activities. Here we report the results of this extended follow-up.

Section snippets

Study design

The study design has been described in part previously [3]. Eligible and willing patients were randomised 1:1 at baseline to complete an exercise training program or to serve as controls during a 4-month active study period. This period was followed by a 6-month extended follow-up at the end of which patients were interviewed. The total study duration was thus 10 months. No intervention was carried out during the extension period. The medication was kept largely unchanged throughout the study

Baseline variables

The baseline data of the 37 patients who were interviewed at 10 months are shown in Table 1. These 37 patients showed similar baseline variables compared to the 49 patients who completed the 4-month active study period. The training (n=17) and control (n=20) groups were well balanced regarding all baseline variables. All but two patients had an ejection fraction less than 50% at inclusion. Six (16%) patients had chronic atrial fibrillation. The aetiology for heart failure was ischemic

Discussion

We have previously reported that a 4-month exercise training programme improved exercise capacity and quality of life in 22 training patients compared to 27 controls [3]. Our findings were in good agreement with the results of other studies [1], [2]. Six months after termination of the initial active study period 37 patients were interviewed regarding PGACQoL, habitual physical activity, and ability to carry out daily activities (DEL). These 37 patients were comparable to all the 49 patients

Conclusions

Four months exercise training in patients with heart failure carried no important sustained beneficial effects 6 months after termination of the training programme. A small sustained improvement in PGACQoL was seen in post-training patients. This was to be expected given that patients obviously were not blinded to the training and was, therefore, probably clinically insignificant. Controls significantly decreased the habitual physical activity over 10 months and post-training patients showed a

Acknowledgements

We thank our co-workers, Evy Hallgren, Ingrid Ohlsson, Marie Holmberg, Katty Reuterskidld, and Anneli Iwarson, without the help of whom this study could not have been completed. This study was supported by a grant from the Swedish Society for Patients with Heart and Lung Diseases.

References (13)

  • M.E Piepoli et al.

    Overview of studies of exercise training in chronic heart failure: the need for a prospective randomized multicentre European trial

    Eur Heart J

    (1998)
  • Experience from controlled trials of physical training in chronic heart failure. Protocol and patient factors in effectiveness in the improvement in exercise tolerance

    Eur Heart J

    (1998)
  • R Willenheimer et al.

    Exercise training in heart failure improves quality of life and exercise capacity

    Eur Heart J

    (1998)
  • J Remes et al.

    Validity of clinical diagnosis of heart failure in primary health care

    Eur Heart J

    (1991)
  • A.R Feinstein et al.

    Changes in dyspnea-fatigue ratings as indicators of quality of life in the treatment of congestive heart failure

    Am J Cardiol

    (1989)
  • C.M.J Cline et al.

    Health-related quality of life in elderly patients with heart failure

    Scand Cardiovasc J

    (1999)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (0)

View full text