Research in context
Evidence before this study
The gaps in therapeutic options for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy are well recognised, and no pharmacological agent is indicated for treatment of the condition (only propranolol carries a US Food and Drug Administration indication for improving New York Heart Association functional class in symptomatic hypertrophic subaortic stenosis based on an uncontrolled series of 13 patients). In the absence of randomised trials, guideline-recommended pharmacological therapy is administered on an empirical basis and includes β blockers or non-dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers, as well as disopyramide for individuals refractory to first-line therapy. Although beneficial for some patients, use of these drugs is limited by side-effects, and often does not provide optimal control of left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) gradients and symptoms, leaving an unmet burden of disease in many patients. We searched PubMed for research articles published between database inception and Aug 14, 2020, using the terms “hypertrophic cardiomyopathy”, “hypertrophic subaortic stenosis”, and “phase 3”, with no language restrictions applied. We did not identify any published phase 3 clinical trial for pharmacological agents. Several agents, such as perhexiline, trimetazidine, ranolazine, eleclazine, spironolactone, valsartan, and losartan, have shown no or limited efficacy in other prospective trials. In the published phase 2 PIONEER-HCM trial in patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, treatment with mavacamten led to improvements in post-exercise LVOT gradients, exercise capacity, and symptoms, and was generally well tolerated, with most adverse effects being mild or moderate, self-limiting, and unrelated to the study drug.
Added value of this study
This pivotal phase 3 EXPLORER-HCM trial is the largest placebo-controlled randomised clinical trial to date in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, to our knowledge. Most patients in the active treatment and placebo groups continued to receive currently available background hypertrophic cardiomyopathy therapy except disopyramide (ie, monotherapy with β blockers or non-dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers). The primary composite functional endpoint and sequential secondary endpoints were designed and discussed with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy experts, patients, and regulatory authorities to comprehensively assess treatment benefits for obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. The endpoints comprised measures of symptoms and functional capacity as well as LVOT obstruction and health status. After 30 weeks of treatment with mavacamten, there was a significant benefit across the composite primary endpoint, its components, and all secondary endpoints, as well as relevant improvements in patient-reported measures and reductions in biomarkers of cardiac wall stress and injury. Treatment with mavacamten was generally well tolerated and the safety profile was similar to placebo. Seven patients on mavacamten (three patients during the 30-week treatment and four patients at the end of treatment) and two on placebo had a transient decrease in left ventricular ejection fraction to less than 50%.
Implications of all the available evidence
Results from this phase 3 trial show significant efficacy of the first targeted pharmacological therapy designed specifically to address the primary underlying pathophysiological basis of obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Treatment with mavacamten led to clinically meaningful improvements in haemodynamic status, functional capacity, and subjective wellbeing. An ongoing, long-term extension of the study will provide further evidence for clinical benefit and safety of mavacamten over 5 years.