Significance of location (anterior versus inferior) and type (Q-wave versus non-Q-wave) of acute myocardial infarction in patients undergoing percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty for postinfarction ischemia

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9149(99)80125-8Get rights and content

Abstract

Predictors of increased risk for recurrent cardiac events and death after acute myocardial infarction include postinfarction myocardial ischemia, anterior location of the infarct, and non-Q-wave versus Q-wave infarction. Although coronary angioplasty is performed in patients with postinfarction ischemia to alleviate symptoms, the outcome according to location and type of infarction and the effect on prevention of subsequent myocardial infarction and death are not known. To determine if location and type of myocardial infarction provide prognostic information in patients with postinfarction ischemia, we analyzed morbidity and mortality during and after coronary angioplasty according to the location (anterior vs inferior) and type (Q-wave vs non-Q-wave) of myocardial infarction in 505 consecutive patients. The incidence of recurrent angina, repeat coronary angioplasty, coronary bypass surgery, reinfarction, and death during long-term follow-up after hospital discharge (mean 34 ± 19 months) for the 440 patients with an initial successful angioplasty was also compared. During the procedure, there was no difference in the primary success rate or mortality among the different groups; however, more patients with anterior non-Q-wave myocardial infarction underwent emergent bypass grafting after unsuccessful coronary angioplasty (p = 0.001). Multivariate Cox proportional-hazards analyses controlling for age, gender, number of diseased vessels, location, type of infarction, and year of coronary angioplasty revealed that more patients with anterior infarction had ≥1 cardiac event (repeat angioplasty, coronary artery bypass grafting, reinfarction, or death) than did those with inferior infarction (RR 1.80, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.22 to 2.65, p = 0.003). The rate of reinfarction or death was 1.93 times higher in patients with anterior than inferior infarction (95% CI 0.97 to 3.82, p = 0.057). There was no difference in these cardiac events for Q-wave versus non-Q-wave infarction (RR 1.15, 95% CI 0.78 to 1.69, p = 0.47). These results suggest that anterior location, but not type, of infarction was associated with a greater likelihood of a cardiac event at follow-up.

References (28)

Cited by (32)

  • Inferior and anterior QRS fragmentation have different prognostic value in patients who received an implantable defibrillator in primary prevention of sudden cardiac death

    2017, International Journal of Cardiology
    Citation Excerpt :

    In the DINAMIT trial a lower LVEF was a predictor of both arrhythmic and non-arrhythmic mortality, hence creating a competing risk [21]. Anterior infarcts were associated with larger MI sizes, a lower LVEF, more overt heart failure, a higher complication rate and higher in-hospital and long-term mortality [22–24]. A second part of the explanation could be related to the anatomy of the autonomic nervous system.

  • Comparison of Outcome in Patients With ST-Elevation Versus Non-ST-Elevation Acute Myocardial Infarction Treated With Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Dynamic Registry)

    2007, American Journal of Cardiology
    Citation Excerpt :

    Overall, need for any repeat revascularization was associated with extent of coronary artery disease and independent of MI type. Rate of repeat PCI in our study (9.3%) is about 50% that observed in the angioplasty era.8 This is most likely related to a decrease in target lesion and vessel revascularizations with stents and drug-eluting stents compared with balloon angioplasty.

  • Prediction of functional recovery after revascularization in coronary artery disease using <sup>18</sup>F-FDG and <sup>123</sup>I-BMIPP SPECT

    2000, Chest
    Citation Excerpt :

    We studied the revascularized region and analyzed the difference of EF and total uptake score, which reflects the change of the revascularized region because both regional wall motion score and uptake score of the inferior region showed no changes in this study (data not shown). Moreover, patients with anterior wall myocardial infarction exhibited a more-depressed left ventricular function and poorer prognosis than patients with inferior infarction.26,27 The spatial resolution of the ultra-high-energy collimator used in this study was somewhat lower than that of a conventional collimator.

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text