New criteria for diagnosis of infective endocarditis: utilization of specific echocardiographic findings

https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9343(94)90143-0Get rights and content

Abstract

purpose: This study was designed to develop improved criteria for the diagnosis of infective endocarditis and to compare these criteria with currently accepted criteria in a large series of cases.

patients and methods: A total of 405 consecutive cases of suspected infective endocarditis in 353 patients evaluated in a tertiary care hospital from 1985 to 1992 were analyzed using new diagnostic criteria for endocarditis. We defined two “major criteria” (typical blood culture and positive echocardiogram) and six “minor criteria” (predisposition, fever, vascular phenomena, immunologic phenomena, suggestive echocardiogram, and suggestive microbiologic findings). We also defined three diagnostic categories: (1) “definite” by pathologic or clinical criteria, (2) “possible,” and (3) “rejected.” Each suspected case of endocarditis was classified using both old and new criteria. Sixty-nine pathologically proven cases were reclassified after exclusion of the surgical or autopsy findings, enabling comparison of clinical diagnostic criteria in proven cases.

results: Fifty-five (80%) of the 69 pathologically confirmed cases were classified as clinically definite endocarditis. The older criteria classified only 35 (51%) of the 69 pathologically confirmed cases into the analogous probable category (p <0.0001). Twelve (17%) pathologically confirmed cases were rejected by older clinical criteria, but none were rejected by the new criteria. Seventy-one (21%) of the remaining 336 cases that were not proven pathologically were probable by older criteria, whereas the new criteria almost doubled the number of definite cases, to 135 (40%, p <0.01). Of the 150 cases rejected by older criteria, 11 were definite, 87 were possible, and 52 were rejected by the new criteria.

conclusion: Application of the proposed new criteria increases the number of definite diagnoses. This should be useful for more accurate diagnosis and classification of patients with suspected endocarditis and provide better entry criteria for epidemiologic studies and clinical trials.

References (38)

  • Van Der MeerJTM et al.

    Epidemiology of bacterial endocarditis in the Netherlands. 1. Patient characteristics

    Arch Intern Med

    (1992)
  • Van Der MeerJTM et al.

    Epidemiology of bacterial endocarditis in the Netherlands. II. Antecedent procedures and use of prophylaxis

    Arch Intern Med

    (1992)
  • GallagherPG et al.

    Listeria monocytogenes endocarditis: a review of the literature 1950–1986

    Scand J Infect Dis

    (1988)
  • LedermanMM et al.

    Duration of fever during treatment of infective endocarditis

    Medicine

    (1992)
  • NahassRG et al.

    Infective endocarditis in intravenous drug users: a comparison of human immunodeficiency virus type 1-negative and -positive patients

    J Infect Dis

    (1990)
  • BayerAS et al.

    Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia

  • KhanderiaBK

    Suspected bacterial endocarditis: to TEE or not to TEE

    J Am Coll Cardiol

    (1993)
  • DanielWG et al.

    Conventional and transoesophageal echocardiography in the diagnosis of infective endocarditis

    Eur Heart J

    (1987)
  • DajaniAS et al.

    Guidelines for the diagnosis of rheumatic fever

  • Cited by (0)

    Support was also provided by the American Heart Association (ASL). Andrea Lukes and David Bright are each the recipient of a Stead Scholarship.

    1

    Support was also provided by the American Heart Association.

    2

    Adrea Lukes and David Bright are each the recipient of a Stead Scholarship.

    *

    The Duke Endocarditis Service is comprised of Mark J. Alberts, M.D., Thomas M. Bashore, M.D., G. Ralph Corey, M.D., James M. Douglas, M.D., Linda Gray, M.D., Frank E. Harrell, Jr., Ph.D., J. Kevin Harrison, M.D., Sheila A. Heinle, M.D., Arthur Morris, M.D., Joseph A. Kisslo, M.D., L.M. Nicely, R.C.V.T., Newland Oldham, M.D., Lisa M. Penning, B.S., Daniel J. Sexton, M.D., Michael Towns, M.D., and Robert A. Waugh, M.D., Durham, North Carolina.

    View full text