Global and regional left ventricular response to bicycle exercise in coronary artery disease

Abstract

The left ventricular response to bicycle exercise was evaluated in 60 patients with coronary artery disease and in 13 normal control subjects. Left ventricular ejection fraction, mean normalized ejection rate and regional wall motion were determined using first-pass radionuclide angiocardiograms obtained at rest and again during peak graded bicycle exercise. All normal subjects demonstrated improved left ventricular function with exercise. Left ventricular ejection fraction increased significantly from 67 ± 3 per cent (mean ± SE) at rest to 82 ± 4 per cent with exercise (p < 0.001). Similarly, the left ventricular ejection rate increased significantly from 3.47 ± 0.31 sec⁻¹ to 6.53 ± 0.42 sec⁻¹(p < 0.001). In contrast, in 44 of 60 patients with coronary artery disease, the ejection fraction or ejection rate either decreased or remained the same with exercise. New or exaggerated regional wall motion abnormalities were detected in 28 of 60 patients with coronary artery disease. Over-all, global or regional evidence of compromised left ventricular reserve was found in 48 of 60 patients with coronary artery disease.

The major determinant of an abnormal left ventricular response to exercise was the presence or absence of electrocardiographic evidence of myocardial ischemia. Left ventricular ejection fraction decreased or remained the same with exercise in all patients with coronary artery disease and electrocardiographic ischemia. New regional wall motion abnormalities were detected in 20 of these patients. In this group, the left ventricular ejection fraction decreased from 66 ± 2 per cent at rest to 58 ± 2 per cent with exercise (p < 0.001), whereas the ejection rate was unchanged by exercise (rest 3.33 ± 0.21 sec⁻¹; exercise 3.34 ± 0.22 sec⁻¹, p > 0.05). Of the 30 patients with coronary artery disease who exercised to symptom-limiting fatigue without electrocardiographic ischemia, 18 demonstrated compromised left ventricular reserve with exercise. Twelve of the remaining patients with coronary artery disease had normal left ventricular reserve, in eight of whom ventricular function was completely normal both at rest and during exercise. In this group exercised to fatigue, the left ventricular ejection fraction increased from 53 ± 4 per cent at rest to 58 ± 2 per cent with exercise (p < 0.001). The ejection rate also increased from 2.48 ± 0.24 sec⁻¹ to 3.67 ± 0.39 sec⁻¹ (p < 0.001). The direction and magnitude of the left ventricular responses to exercise were not affected by long-term oral propranolol administration in 22 patients. Based upon either abnormal exercise left ventricular reserve or abnormal global and regional left ventricular function at rest, the over-all sensitivity of this radionuclide technic for the detection of coronary artery disease was 87 per cent (52 of 60 patients). These data demonstrate that exercise ventricular performance studies provide important physiologic insights into left ventricular functional reserve as well as a sensitive noninvasive approach for the detection of coronary artery disease.