Elsevier

American Heart Journal

Volume 118, Issue 4, October 1989, Pages 748-754
American Heart Journal

Dynamics of functional mitral regurgitation during dobutamine therapy in patients with severe congestive heart failure: A Doppler echocardiographic study

https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-8703(89)90588-7Get rights and content

Abstract

Functional mitral regurgitation plays a major role in determining the therapeutic response to vasodilators in patients with severe congestive heart failure. Its role in the response to inotropic therapy has not been studied in these patients. Ten patients with stage 3 or 4 congestive heart failure (New York Heart Association class) and secondary mitral regurgitation were studied before and during intravenous administration of dobutamine (mean dose, 7.4 μg/kg/min). Hemodynamic measurements were obtained invasively. Echo and Doppler cardiography were used to determine cardiac volumes. Mitral regurgitation was calculated as the difference between total stroke volume by echo and forward stroke volume by Doppler. Mitral regurgitation area was calculated from a modified hemodynamic formula. Dobutamine caused a marked rise in mean forward stroke volume (43 to 61 ml), with a decrease in mitral regurgitation volume from 20 to 10 ml/beat and a drop in pulmonary capillary wedge pressure from 21 to 13 mm Hg. Since the pressure gradient between the left ventricle and atrium increased significantly during dobutamine therapy, only a marked decrease in the orifice of regurgitation could explain the changes in regurgitant volume. Indeed, the end-diastolic volume decreased from 254 to 234 ml and the orifice of mitral regurgitation was reduced from 0.25 to 0.12 cm2.

References (31)

  • M Packer et al.

    Physiologic and pharmacologic determinants of vasodilator response: a conceptual framework for rational drug therapy for chronic heart failure

    Prog Cardiovasc Dis

    (1982)
  • JN Cohn et al.

    Neurohumoral control mechanism in congestive heart failure

    Am Heart J

    (1981)
  • MJ Likoff et al.

    Comparison of acute hemodynamic effects of dobutamine and intravenous MDL 17,043 in severe congestive heart failure secondary to ischemic or dilated cardiomyopathy

    Am J Cardiol

    (1986)
  • C Yoran et al.

    Dynamic aspects of mitral regurgitation: effects of ventricular volume, pressure and contractility on the effective regurgitant orifice area

    Circulation

    (1979)
  • DM Borgenhagen et al.

    The effects of left ventricular load and contractility on mitral regurgitant orifice size and flow in the dog

    Circulation

    (1976)
  • Cited by (47)

    • Pharmacologic management of myxomatous mitral valve disease in dogs

      2012, Journal of Veterinary Cardiology
      Citation Excerpt :

      High-dose pimobendan (0.3 mg/kg TID); (see Class C1 discussion) In one of the author’s (CEA) clinic, high-dose pimobendan is frequently used and the experience is that it is both safe and effective in refractory heart failure. Intravenous inotropic support, using dobutamine at 2–15 ug/kg/min) as an alternative, more rapidly acting inotrope (also a lusitropic and afterload-reducing agent, which means it has the potential to reduce the mitral valve orifice size,59 thereby reducing MR). Class D2 denotes dogs which have developed signs of CHF and/or low output signs (e.g., exercise intolerance, weakness, syncope) and which have been treated and relapsed or failed to respond to initial treatment (thereby, are refractory).

    • Mitral annular hinge motion contribution to changes in mitral septal-lateral dimension and annular area

      2009, Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
      Citation Excerpt :

      Pre-ejection annular area reduction is an important mechanism for mitral valve leaflet competency.27 It is also known that inotropically induced mitral area reduction abolishes mitral insufficiency in functional mitral regurgitation.28 Measuring the dynamic mitral annular area, however, is challenging.

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Supported in part by the G. Harold and Leila Y. Mathers foundation.

    View full text