Skip to main content
Log in

Quality of life among patients with severe aortic stenosis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Netherlands Heart Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The disease burden of patients with severe aortic stenosis is not often explored, while the incidence is increasing and many patients who have an indication for aortic valve replacement are not referred for surgery. We studied the quality of life of 191 patients with severe aortic stenosis, hypothesising that symptomatic patients have a far worse quality of life than the general population, which could enforce the indication for surgery.

Methods

The SF-36v2 Health Survey was completed by 191 consecutive patients with symptomatic or asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis.

Results

Asymptomatic patients (n = 59) had health scores comparable with the general Dutch population but symptomatic patients (n = 132) scored significantly lower across different age categories. Physical functioning, general health and vitality were impaired, as well as social functioning and emotional well-being. There was no relation between degree of stenosis and physical or mental health scores.

Conclusions

Both physical and emotional problems have a major impact on normal daily life and social functioning of symptomatic patients with severe aortic stenosis, regardless of age. If the aortic stenosis is above the ‘severe’ threshold, the degree of stenosis does not predict disease burden. These results encourage to reconsider a conservative approach in symptomatic patients with severe aortic stenosis. Using the SF-36v2 Health Survey together with this study, an individual patient’s quality of life profile can be assessed and compared with the patient group or with the general population. This can assist in decision making for the individual patient.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chan KL, Teo K, Dumesnil JG, et al. Effect of Lipid lowering with rosuvastatin on progression of aortic stenosis: results of the aortic stenosis progression observation: measuring effects of rosuvastatin (ASTRONOMER) trial. Circulation. 2010;121(2):306–14.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Cowell SJ, Newby DE, Prescott RJ, et al. A randomized trial of intensive lipid-lowering therapy in calcific aortic stenosis. N Engl J Med. 2005;352(23):2389–97.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Rossebo AB, Pedersen TR, Boman K, et al. Intensive lipid lowering with simvastatin and ezetimibe in aortic stenosis. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(13):1343–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Melby SJ, Zierer A, Kaiser SP, et al. Aortic valve replacement in octogenarians: risk factors for early and late mortality. Ann Thorac Surg. 2007;83(5):1651–6. discussion 6–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kolh P, Kerzmann A, Honore C, et al. Aortic valve surgery in octogenarians: predictive factors for operative and long-term results. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2007;31(4):600–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Vahanian A, Alfieri O, Andreotti F, et al. Guidelines on the management of valvular heart disease (version 2012): the joint task force on the management of valvular heart disease of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2012.

  7. Lefevre T, Kappetein AP, Wolner E, et al. One year follow-up of the multi-centre European PARTNER transcatheter heart valve study. Eur Heart J. 2011;32(2):148–57.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bonow RO, Carabello BA, Kanu C, et al. ACC/AHA 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (writing committee to revise the 1998 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease): developed in collaboration with the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists: endorsed by the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Circulation. 2006;114(5):e84–231.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Vahanian A, Baumgartner H, Bax J, et al. Guidelines on the management of valvular heart disease: the task force on the management of valvular heart disease of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J. 2007;28(2):230–68.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. van Geldorp MW, van Gameren M, Kappetein AP, et al. Therapeutic decisions for patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis: room for improvement? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2009;35(6):953–7. discussion 7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Charlson E, Legedza AT, Hamel MB. Decision-making and outcomes in severe symptomatic aortic stenosis. J Heart Valve Dis. 2006;15(3):312–21.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Iung B, Cachier A, Baron G, et al. Decision-making in elderly patients with severe aortic stenosis: why are so many denied surgery? Eur Heart J. 2005;26(24):2714–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bouma BJ, van der Meulen JH, van den Brink RB, et al. Variability in treatment advice for elderly patients with aortic stenosis: a nationwide survey in The Netherlands. Heart. 2001;85(2):196–201.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Sundt TM, Bailey MS, Moon MR, et al. Quality of life after aortic valve replacement at the age of >80 years. Circulation. 2000;102(19 Suppl 3):III70–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Noyez L, de Jager MJ, Markou AL. Quality of life after cardiac surgery: underresearched research. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2011;13(5):511–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Calkins DR, Rubenstein LV, Cleary PD, et al. Failure of physicians to recognize functional disability in ambulatory patients. Ann Intern Med. 1991;114(6):451–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Heuvelman HJ, van Geldorp MW, Kappetein AP, et al. Clinical course of patients diagnosed with severe aortic stenosis in the Rotterdam area: insights from the AVARIJN study. Neth Heart J. 2012. doi:10.1007/s12471-012-0309-3

  18. Ware Jr JE, Kosinski M, Bjorner JB, et al. User’s manual for the SF-36v2 TM health survey. 2nd ed. Lincoln: Quality Metric; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Aaronson NK, Muller M, Cohen PD, et al. Translation, validation, and norming of the Dutch language version of the SF-36 Health Survey in community and chronic disease populations. J Clin Epidemiol. 1998;51(11):1055–68.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Bouma BJ, van Den Brink RB, van Der Meulen JH, et al. To operate or not on elderly patients with aortic stenosis: the decision and its consequences. Heart. 1999;82(2):143–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Wu Y, Jin R, Gao G, et al. Cost-effectiveness of aortic valve replacement in the elderly: an introductory study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2007;133(3):608–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Wu Y, Grunkemeier GL, Starr A. The value of aortic valve replacement in elderly patients: an economic analysis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2007;133(3):603–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Bach DS, Cimino N, Deeb GM. Unoperated patients with severe aortic stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;50(20):2018–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Varadarajan P, Kapoor N, Bansal RC, et al. Clinical profile and natural history of 453 nonsurgically managed patients with severe aortic stenosis. Ann Thorac Surg. 2006;82(6):2111–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Iung B, Baron G, Butchart EG, et al. A prospective survey of patients with valvular heart disease in Europe: the euro heart survey on Valvular Heart Disease. Eur Heart J. 2003;24(13):1231–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Das P, Rimington H, Chambers J. Exercise testing to stratify risk in aortic stenosis. Eur Heart J. 2005;26(13):1309–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Sjogren J, Thulin LI. Quality of life in the very elderly after cardiac surgery: a comparison of SF-36 between long-term survivors and an age-matched population. Gerontology. 2004;50(6):407–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. van Geldorp MWA, Heuvelman HJ, Kappetein AP, et al. The effect of aortic valve replacement on quality of life in symptomatic patients with severe aortic stenosis. Neth Heart J. 2013;21. doi:10.1007/s12471-012-0362-y

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the patients, cardiologists, echo laboratory staff and secretaries of the following hospitals for their kind cooperation: Havenziekenhuis, Rotterdam; St. Franciscus Gasthuis, Rotterdam; IJsselland Hospital, Capelle aan den IJssel; Vlietland Hospital, Vlaardingen; Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht; Medisch Centrum Rijnmond Zuid, Rotterdam; and Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam.

Disclosures

None of the authors have any competing interests.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. W. A. van Geldorp.

Additional information

The questions can be answered after the article has been published in print. You have to log in to: www.cvoi.nl.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

van Geldorp, M.W.A., Heuvelman, H.J., Kappetein, A.P. et al. Quality of life among patients with severe aortic stenosis. Neth Heart J 21, 21–27 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12471-012-0364-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12471-012-0364-9

Keywords

Navigation