Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion and Ligation Devices: What Is Available, How to Implement Them, and How to Manage and Avoid Complications

  • Arrhythmias (B Stambler, Section Editor)
  • Published:
Current Treatment Options in Cardiovascular Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Opinion statement

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia worldwide, and it is associated with an elevated risk of thromboembolic events, including ischemic stroke. Evidence suggests that at least 90 % of left atrial thrombi discovered in patients with AF are localized to the left atrial appendage (LAA). Surgical ligation or excision of the LAA is considered the standard of care in patients who undergo mitral valve surgery or as an adjunct to a surgical Maze procedure for treatment of AF. In addition, in selected patients with AF and an elevated risk of thromboembolic events, particularly in those with contraindication to oral anticoagulation (OAC) therapy, it is reasonable to consider LAA exclusion to offer protection against ischemic stroke and other embolic complications. This can be achieved through a number of different strategies, including surgical amputation or ligation of the LAA, percutaneous endocardial occlusion of the LAA by deployment of occlusive devices, and also ligation of the LAA via a closed-chest, percutaneous, epicardial catheter-based approach in select patients. Although results from several recent percutaneous LAA closure and ligation studies are highly promising, the evidence for long-term efficacy and safety is insufficient to presently recommend this approach to all patients other than those in whom long-term OAC is contraindicated. Future randomized studies are required to further address the long-term safety and efficacy of these therapeutic options. Finally, the role for LAA occlusion and ligation seems less clear in patients who undergo successful catheter ablation of AF, since at least in a subgroup of these patients antiplatelet therapy alone has been shown to be sufficient.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References and Recommended Reading

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. Wolf PA, Abbott RD, Kannel WB. Atrial fibrillation as an independent risk factor for stroke: the Framingham Study. Stroke. 1991;22:983–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Whitlock RP, Healey JS, Connolly SJ. Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion Does Not Eliminate the Need for Warfarin. Circulation. 2009;120:1927–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Fuster V, Ryden LE, Cannom DS, et al. ACC/AHA/ESC 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the European Society of Cardiology Committee for Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 2001 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation): developed in collaboration with the European Heart Rhythm Association and the Heart Rhythm Society. Circulation. 2006;114:e257–354.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ezekowitz MD, Bridgers SL, James KE, Carliner NH, Colling CL, Gornick CC, Krause-Steinrauf H, Kurtzke JF, Nazarian SM, Radford MJ. Warfarin in the prevention of stroke associated with nonrheumatic atrial fibrillation. Veterans Affairs Stroke Prevention in Nonrheumatic Atrial Fibrillation Investigators. N Engl J Med. 1992;327:1406–12.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Blackshear JL, Odell JA. Appendage obliteration to reduce stroke in cardiac surgical patients with atrial fibrillation. Ann Thorac Surg. 1996;61:755–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Syed FF, Asirvatham SJ. Left atrial appendage as a target for reducing strokes: Justifiable rationale? Safe and effective approaches? Heart Rhythm. 2011;8:194–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Johnson WD, Ganjoo AK, Stone CD, Srivyas RC, Howard M. The left atrial appendage: our most lethal human attachment! Surgical implications. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2000;17:718–22.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Singh IM, Holmes DR. Left Atrial Appendage Closure. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2010;12:413–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Al-Saady NM, Obel OA, Camm AJ. Left atrial appendage: structure, function, and role in thromboembolism. Heart. 1999;82:547–54.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Manning WJ. Atrial fibrillation, transesophageal echo, electrical cardioversion, and anticoagulation. Clin Cardiol. 1995;18:58. 114.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Wyse DG, Waldo AL, DiMarco JP, Domanski MJ, Rosenberg Y, Schron EB, Kellen JC, Greene HL, Mickel MC, Dalquist JE, Corley SD. Atrial Fibrillation Follow-up Investigation of Rhythm Management (AFFIRM) Investigators. A comparison of rate control and rhythm control in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:1825–33.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Bonow RO, Carabello BA, Chatterjee K, de Leon Jr AC, Faxon DP, Freed MD, Gaasch WH, Lytle BW, Nishimura RA, O'Gara PT, O'Rourke RA, Otto CM, Shah PM, Shanewise JS. Writing Committee Members; American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force. 2008 Focused update incorporated into the ACC/AHA 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 1998 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease): endorsed by the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Circulation. 2008;118:e523–661.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Dawson AG, Asopa S, Dunning J. Should patients undergoing cardiac surgery with atrial fibrillation have left atrial appendage exclusion? Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2010;10:306–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Garcia-Fernandez MA, Perez-David E, Quiles J, et al. Role of left atrial appendage obliteration in stroke reduction in patients with mitral valve prosthesis: a transesophageal echocardiographic study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;42:1253–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Healey JS, Crystal E, Lamy A, et al. Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion Study (LAAOS): results of a randomized controlled pilot study of left atrial appendage occlusion during coronary bypass surgery in patients at risk for stroke. Am Heart J. 2005;150:288–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Katz ES, Tsiamtsiouris T, Applebaum RM, Schwartzbard A, Tunick PA, Kronzon I. Surgical left atrial appendage ligation is frequently incomplete: a transesophageal echocardiographic study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000;36:468–71.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Blackshear JL, Johnson WD, Odell JA, et al. Thoracoscopic extracardiac obliteration of the left atrial appendage for stroke risk reduction in atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;42:1249–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Sievert H, Lesh MD, Trepels T, et al. Percutaneous left atrial appendage transcatheter occlusion to prevent stroke in high-risk patients with atrial fibrillation: Early clinical experience. Circulation. 2002;105:1887–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ostermayer SH, Reisman M, Kramer PH, et al. Percutaneous left atrial appendage transcatheter occlusion (PLAATO system) to prevent stroke in high-risk patients with non-rheumatic atrial fibrillation: results from the international multi-center feasibility trials. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;46:9–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ussia GP, Mule M, Cammalleri V, Scarabelli M, Barbanti M, Imme S, Mangiafico S, Marchese A, Galassi AR, Tamburino C. Percutaneous closure of left atrial appendage to prevent embolic events in high-risk patients with chronic atrial fibrillation. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2009;74:217–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Park JW, Leithauser B, Gerk U, Vrsansky M, Jung F. Percutaneous left atrial appendage transcatheter occlusion (PLAATO) for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: 2-year outcomes. J Invasive Cardiol. 2009;21:446–50.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Block PC, Burstein S, Casale PN, et al. Percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion for patients in atrial fibrillation suboptimal for warfarin therapy: 5-year results of the PLAATO (Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Transcatheter Occlusion) Study. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2009;2:594–600.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Chiam PT, Ruiz CE. Percutaneous transcatheter left atrial appendage exclusion in atrial fibrillation. J Invasive Cardiol. 2008;20:E109–13.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Sick PB, Schuler G, Hauptmann KE, Grube E, Yakubov S, Turi ZG, Mishkel G, Almany S, Holmes DR. Initial worldwide experience with the WATCHMAN left atrial appendage system for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;49:1490–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Holmes DR, Reddy VY, Turi ZG, et al. Percutaneous closure of the left atrial appendage versus warfarin therapy for prevention of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation: a randomised non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2009;374:534–42.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Viles-Gonzalez JF, Kar S, Douglas P, Dukkipati S, Feldman T, Horton R, Holmes D, Reddy VY. The clinical impact of incomplete left atrial appendage closure with the Watchman Device in patients with atrial fibrillation: a PROTECT AF (Percutaneous Closure of the Left Atrial Appendage Versus Warfarin Therapy for Prevention of Stroke in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation) substudy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;59:923–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Fuller CJ, Reisman M. Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation: Atrial Appendage Closure. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2011;13:159–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Bartus K, Bednarek J, Myc J, Kapelak B, Sadowski J, Lelakowski J, Yakubov S, Lee R. Feasibility of closed-chest ligation of the left atrial appendage in humans. Heart Rhythm. 2011;8:188–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Sosa E, Scanavacca M, d’Avila A, Pilleggi F. A new technique to perform epicardial mapping in the electrophysiology laboratory. J Cardiovasc Electrophys. 1996;7:531–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Bartus K, Bednarek J, Myc J, Kapelak B, Sadowski J, Lelakowski J, Yakubov S, Lee R. Long-term Safety and Efficacy of Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Suture Ligation in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation. In press.In this study, the authors attempted closed-chest, percutaneous, epicardial LAA ligation using the LARIAT snare device in a cohort of 85 patients. In 82 patients complete LAA closure was acutely achieved. At 30 days, complete LAA closure was still present in 75 of 78 patients, while 3 patients were noted to have a small reopening of < 2 mm jet.

  31. Harloff A, Handke M, Reinhard M, Geibel A, Hetzel A. Therapeutic strategies after examination by transesophageal echocardiography in 503 patients with ischemic stroke. Stroke. 2006;37:859–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Bogousslavsky J, Van Melle G, Regli F, Kappenberger L. Pathogenesis of anterior circulation stroke in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation: the Lausanne Stroke Registry. Neurology. 1990;40:1046–50.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Miller VT, Rothrock JF, Pearce LA, Feinberg WM, Hart RG, Anderson DC. Ischemic stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation: effect of aspirin according to stroke mechanism. Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation Investigators. Neurology. 1993;43:32–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Saad EB, d'Avila A, Costa IP, Aryana A, Slater C, Costa RE, Inácio LA Jr, Maldonado P, Neto DM, Camiletti A, Camanho LE, Polanczyk CA. Very low risk of thromboembolic events in patients undergoing successful catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation with a CHADS2 ≤3: A Long-term Outcome Study. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 2011;4:615–21.In this study, the safety of long-term cessation of OAC therapy following catheter ablation of paroxysmal and persistent AF was prospectively evaluated. OAC and AADs were discontinued irrespective of AF type or baseline CHADS2 risk score in 327 patients with a mean CHADS2 score of 1.89 (45.4 % with a CHADS2 score of 2 and 23.2 % with a score of 3). No symptomatic ischemic cerebrovascular or thromboembolic events were observed following cessation of OAC and AADs following catheter ablation of AF, during long-term follow-up (mean: 46 ± 17 months). On the other hand, 3 cases of symptomatic hemorrhagic stroke were observed in post-AF ablation patients receiving OAC therapy.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Bhargava M, Di Biase L, Mohanty P, Prasad S, Martin DO, Williams-Andrews M, et al. Impact of type of atrial fibrillation and repeat catheter ablation on long-term freedom from atrial fibrillation: results from a multicenter study. Heart Rhythm. 2009;6:1403–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Oral H, Chugh A, Ozaydin M, Good E, Fortino J, Sankaran S, et al. Risk of thromboembolic events after percutaneous left atrial radiofrequency ablation of atrial fibrillation. Circulation. 2006;114:759–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Themistoclakis S, Corrado A, Marchlinski FE, Jais P, Zado E, Rossillo A, et al. The risk of thromboembolism and need for oral anticoagulation after successful atrial fibrillation ablation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;55:735–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Ad N, Henry L, Schlauch K, Holmes SD, Hunt S. The CHADS score role in managing anticoagulation after surgical ablation for atrial fibrillation. Ann Thorac Surg. 2010;90:1257–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Dagres N, Hindricks G, Kottkamp H, Sommer P, Gaspar T, Bode K, et al. Real-life anticoagulation treatment of atrial fibrillation after catheter ablation: Possible overtreatment of low-risk patients. Thromb Haemost. 2009;102:754–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosure

A. Aryana: none; E.B. Saad: none; A. d’Avila: Consulting fee or honorarium from Sentre Heart and Atritech.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Regional Cardiology Associates and Mercy Heart & Vascular Institute, Sacramento, CA, USA

    Arash Aryana MD

  2. Center for Atrial Fibrillation, Hospital Pró-Cardíaco, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil

    Eduardo B. Saad MD

  3. Helmsely Cardiac Arrhythmia Service, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, One Gustave L. Levy Place–, Box 1030, New York, NY, 10029, USA

    André d’Avila MD, PhD

Authors
  1. Arash Aryana MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Eduardo B. Saad MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. André d’Avila MD, PhD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to André d’Avila MD, PhD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Aryana, A., Saad, E.B. & d’Avila, A. Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion and Ligation Devices: What Is Available, How to Implement Them, and How to Manage and Avoid Complications. Curr Treat Options Cardio Med 14, 503–519 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11936-012-0203-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11936-012-0203-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation