Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Echocardiographic Evaluation of the Right Ventricle: a 2014 Perspective

  • Echocardiography (JM Gardin, Section Editor)
  • Published:
Current Cardiology Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The ability to properly evaluate the right ventricular size and function can have important consequences for clinical management and prognosis. Echocardiography is and will remain the leading method of right ventricle (RV) assessment due to its ease of use and wealth of diagnostic information provided. Understanding the various strengths and limitations of the diverse echocardiographic methods of RV assessment can allow a systematic approach to resolve situations where one’s quantitative parameters are not necessarily concordant. Quantification of RV volume can be done by two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) echocardiography. Measurements of RV systolic function include fractional area change (FAC), right-sided index of myocardial performance (RIMP), RV ejection fraction (RVEF), tricuspid annular plane excursion by M-Mode (TAPSE), tricuspid annular systolic longitudinal velocity by tissue Doppler (S’), and regional strain and strain rate. RVEF can also be assessed volumetrically by 3D echocardiography. This article will review the current methods used in contemporary echocardiography laboratories, with an emphasis on a guideline-based approach as well as emerging techniques.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. Haddad R, Hunt SA, Rosenthal DN, et al. Right ventricular function in cardiovascular disease, part I: anatomy, physiology, aging, and functional assessment of the right ventricle. Circulation. 2008;117:1436–48.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ho SY, Nihoyannopoulos P. Anatomy, echocardiography, and normal right ventricular dimensions. Heart. 2006;92(1):12–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Rudski LG, Afilalo J. The blind men of Indostan and the elephant in the echo lab. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2012;25(7):714–7. An editorial that summarizes the need for a global and condition-based approach toward the assessment of RV function.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Antoni ML, Scherptong RW, Atary JZ, et al. Prognostic value of right ventricular function in patients after acute myocardial infarction treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2010;3:264–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. La Vecchia L, Paccanaro M, Bonanno C, et al. Left ventricular versus biventricular dysfunction in idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. Am J Cardiol. 1999;83:120–2. A129.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Gulati A, Ismail TF, Jabbour A, et al. The prevalence and prognostic significance of right ventricular systolic dysfunction in nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy. Circulation. 2013;128:1623–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Melenovsky V, Kotrc M, Borlaug BA, et al. Relationships between right ventricular function, body composition, and prognosis in advanced heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;62:1660–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Meyer P, Filippatos GS, Ahmed MI, et al. Effects of right ventricular ejection fraction on outcomes in chronic systolic heart failure. Circulation. 2010;121:252–8.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Di Salvo TG, Mathier M, Semigran MJ, et al. Preserved right ventricular ejection fraction predicts exercise capacity and survival in advanced heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995;25:1143–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Dini FL, Demmer RT, Simioniuc A, et al. Right ventricular dysfunction is associated with chronic kidney disease and predicts survival in patients with chronic systolic heart failure. Eur J Heart Fail. 2012;14:287–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Rudski LG, Lai WW, Afilalo J, Hua L, et al. Guidelines for the echocardiographic assessment of the right heart in adults: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2010;23:685–713. This is the first guideline document specifically designed to provide recommendations for the comprehensive echocardiographic assessment of all right heart parameters. A revised version of the guidelines incorporating new data is currently underway.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ling LF, Obuchowski NA, Rodriguez L, et al. Accuracy and interobserver concordance of echocardiographic assessment of right ventricular size and systolic function: a quality control exercise. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2012;25:709–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lang RM, Badano LP, Tsang W, et al. EAE/ASE recommendations for image acquisition and display using three-dimensional echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2012;25:3–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Bhave NM, Patel AR, Weinert L, et al. Three dimensional modeling of the right ventricle from two-dimensional transthoracic echocardiographic images: utility of knowledge based reconstruction in pulmonary arterial hypertension. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2013;26(8):860.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Shimada YJ, Shiota M, Siegel RJ, et al. Accuracy of right ventricular volumes and function determined by three-dimensional echocardiography in comparison with magnetic resonance imaging: a meta-analysis. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2010;23:943–53. This article represents a meta-analysis of RV function by 3D echocardiography as compared to MRI in over 800 subjects. It demonstrates some limitations of 3D echocardiography including a systematic underestimation of RV volumes.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Afilalo J, Graspa J, Durighel G, et al. Learning curve for quantification of right ventricular size and systolic function in pulmonary arterial hypertension: comparison of cardiac magnetic resonance and three-dimensional echocardiography. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2012;14 Suppl 1:81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Maffessanti F, Muraru D, Esposito R, et al. Age-, body size-, sex-specific reference values for right ventricular volumes and ejection fraction by three dimensional echocardiography: a multicenter echocardiographic study in 507 healthy volunteers. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013;6:700–10. This large study provides population-based normal values for RV volumes and ejection fraction by 3-Dimensional Echocardiography.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Afilalo J, Muraru D, Sebag IA, Steele R, Rudski LG. Consolidated normal reference limits for right ventricular quantification by 3-dimensional echocardiography using a novel meta-analytic approach. Eur Heart J. 2013;34 suppl 1:1098.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lai WW, Gauvreau K, Rivera ES, et al. Accuracy of guideline recommendations for two-dimensional quantification of the right ventricle by echocardiography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2008;24:691–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Nikitin NP, Witte KKA, Thackray SDR, et al. Longitudinal ventricular function: normal values of atrioventricular annular and myocardial velocities measured with quantitative two-dimensional color Doppler tissue imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr Off Publ Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2003;16:906–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Innelli P, Esposito R, Olibet M, et al. The impact of ageing on right ventricular longitudinal function in healthy subjects: a pulsed tissue Doppler study. Eur J Echocardiogr J Work Group Echocardiogr Eur Soc Cardiol. 2009;10:491–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Anavekar NS, Skali H, Bourgoun M, et al. Usefulness of right ventricular fractional area change to predict death, heart failure, and stroke following myocardial infarction (from the VALIANT ECHO Study). Am J Cardiol. 2008;101:607–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Vizzardi E, D’Aloia A, Bordonali T, et al. Long-term prognostic value of the right ventricular myocardial performance index compared to other indexes of right ventricular function in patients with moderate chronic heart failure. Echocardiography. 2012;29:773–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Tei C, Dujardin KS, Hodge DO, Bailey KR, et al. Doppler echocardiographic index for assessment of global right ventricular function. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 1996;9:838–47.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Sebbag I, Rudski LG, Therrien J, et al. Effect of chronic infusion of epoprostenol on echocardiographic right ventricular myocardial performance index and its relation to clinical outcome in patients with primary pulmonary hypertension. Am J Cardiol. 2001;88:1060–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Shimony A, Afilalo J, Flynn AW, et al. Usefulness of right ventricular dysfunction to predict new onset atrial fibrillation following coronary artery bypass grafting. Am J Cardiol. 2014;113(6):913–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Sawaya H, Sebag IA. Early detection and prediction of cardiotoxicity in chemotherapy-treated patients. Am J Cardiol. 2011;107:1375–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Tamborini G, Muratori M, Brusoni D, et al. Is right ventricular systolic function reduced after cardiac surgery? A two- and three-dimensional echocardiographic study. Eur J Echocardiogr J Work Group Echocardiogr Eur Soc Cardiol. 2009;10:630–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Mor-Avi V, Lang RM, Badano LP, et al. Current and evolving echocardiographic techniques for the quantitative evaluation of cardiac mechanics. J Am Soc Echocardiogra Off Publ Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2011;24:277–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Kalogeropoulos AP, Georgiopoulou VV, Howell S, et al. Evaluation of right intraventricular dyssynchrony by two-dimensional strain echocardiography in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension. J Am Soc Echocardiogr Off Publ Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2008;21:1028–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Teske AJ, Cox MG, De Boeck DM, et al. Echocardiographic tissue deformation imaging quantifies abnormal regional right ventricular function in arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia/cardiomyopathy. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2009;22:920–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Guendouz S, Rappeneau S, Nahum J, et al. Prognostic significance and normal values of 2D strain to assess right ventricular systolic function in chronic heart failure. Circulation. 2012;76:127–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Cappelli F, Porciani MC, Bergesio F, et al. Right ventricular function in AL amyloidosis: characteristics and prognostic implication. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012;13:416–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Fine NM, Chen L, Bastiansen PM, et al. Outcome prediction by quantitative right ventricular function assessment in 575 subjects evaluated for pulmonary hypertension. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013;6:711–21. A recent prospective study of 575 patients demonstrating that RV free wall systolic strain can be a powerful predictor of clinical outcomes in patients with pulmonary hypertension over a broad range of pulmonary pressures.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Cameli M, Righini FM, Lisi M, et al. Comparison of right versus left ventricular strain analysis as a predictor of outcome in patients with systolic heart failure referred for heart transplantation. Am J Cardiol. 2013;112(11):1778–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Maffessanti F, Gripari P, Tamborini G, et al. Evaluation of right ventricular systolic function after mitral valve repair: a two-dimensional Doppler, speckle-tracking, and three-dimensional echocardiographic study. J Am Soc Echocardiogr Off Publ Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2012;25:701–8. 42 patients undergoing isolated mitral valve repair surgery demonstrated that postoperative Rv function could not be predicted from preoperative values on the baseline echo. Thus demonstrating that the mechanism of postoperative change did not appear to be related to the preexisting RV dysfunction. RV strain was reduced postoperatively supporting the idea that pericardial disruption may unmask subclinical RV disfunction.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Sugeng L, Mor-Avi V, Weinert L, et al. Multimodality comparison of quantitative volumetric analysis of the right ventricle. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2010;3:10–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Jiang L, Siu SC, Handschumacher MD, et al. Three-dimensional echocardiography. In vivo validation for right ventricular volume and function. Circulation. 1994;89:2342–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Compliance with Ethics Guidelines

Conflict of Interest

Shoshana Gal Portnoy declares that she has no conflict of interest. Lawrence G. Rudski reports minor stock holding outside managed portfolio for General Electric.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Cardiology, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada

    Shoshana Gal Portnoy & Lawrence G. Rudski

Authors
  1. Shoshana Gal Portnoy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lawrence G. Rudski
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lawrence G. Rudski.

Additional information

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Echocardiography

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Portnoy, S.G., Rudski, L.G. Echocardiographic Evaluation of the Right Ventricle: a 2014 Perspective. Curr Cardiol Rep 17, 21 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11886-015-0578-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11886-015-0578-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation