Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Deriving coronary artery calcium scores from CT coronary angiography: a proposed algorithm for evaluating stable chest pain

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We validate a method of calcium scoring on CT coronary angiography (CTCA) and propose an algorithm for the assessment of patients with stable chest pain. 503 consecutive patients undergoing coronary artery calcium score (CACS) and CTCA were included. A 0.1 cm2 region of interest was used to determine the mean contrast density on CTCA images either in the left main stem (LM) or right coronary artery. Axial 3 mm CTCA images were scored for calcium using conventional software with a modified threshold: mean LM contrast density (HU) + 2SD. A conversion factor (CF) for predicting CACS from raw CTCA scores (rCTCAS) was determined using a multivariable regression model adjusted for model over-optimism (1,000 bootstrap samples). Accuracy of this method was determined using weighted kappa for NICE recommended CACS groupings (0, 1–400, >400) and Bland–Altman analysis for absolute score. With the CF applied: CACS = (1.183 × rCTCAS) + (0.002 × rCTCAS × threshold), there was excellent agreement between methods for absolute score (mean difference 5.44 [95 % limits of agreement −207.0 to 217.8]). The method discriminated between high (>400) and low risk (<400) calcium scores with a sensitivity and specificity of 85 and 99 %, and a PPV and NPV of 92 and 98 %, respectively, and led to a significant reduction in radiation exposure (6.9 [5.1–10.2] vs. 5.2 [6.3–8.7] mSv; p < 0.0001). Our proposed method allows a comprehensive assessment of coronary artery pathology through the use of an individualised, semi-automated approach. If incorporated into stable chest pain guidelines the need for further functional testing or invasive angiography could be determined from CTCA alone, supporting a change to the current guidelines.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

CACS:

Coronary artery calcium score

CT:

Computed tomography

CTCA:

CT coronary angiography

CAD:

Coronary artery disease

DSCT:

Dual source multi-detector CT

PPM:

Permanent pacemaker

ROI:

Region of interest

RCA:

Right coronary artery

LCX:

Left circumflex artery

LMA:

Left main coronary artery

LAD:

Left anterior descending artery

DLP:

Dose-length product

MESA:

Multi-Ethnic Study Atherosclerosis

References

  1. Agatston AS, Janowitz WR, Hildner FJ, Zusmer NR, Viamonte M Jr, Detrano R (1990) Quantification of coronary artery calcium using ultrafast computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 15(4):827–832

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. National Institute for Heath and Clinical Excellence (NICE) (2010) CT calcium scoring factsheet. NICE guidelines [Internet]. NICE Guidelines. [Cited 2013 Nov 17]. http://www.nice.org.uk/nicemedia/live/12947/47987/47987.pdf

  3. Achenbach S, Marwan M, Ropers D, Schepis T, Pflederer T, Anders K et al (2010) Coronary computed tomography angiography with a consistent dose below 1 mSv using prospectively electrocardiogram-triggered high-pitch spiral acquisition. Eur Heart J 31(3):340–346

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Otton JM, Lønborg JT, Boshell D, Feneley M, Hayen A, Sammel N et al (2012) A method for coronary artery calcium scoring using contrast-enhanced computed tomography. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 6(1):37–44

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bischoff B, Kantert C, Meyer T, Hadamitzky M, Martinoff S, Schömig A et al (2012) Cardiovascular risk assessment based on the quantification of coronary calcium in contrast-enhanced coronary computed tomography angiography. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 13(6):468–475

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Van der Bijl N, Joemai RMS, Geleijns J, Bax JJ, Schuijf JD, de Roos A et al (2010) Assessment of Agatston coronary artery calcium score using contrast-enhanced CT coronary angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 195(6):1299–1305

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Pavitt CW, Zielke S, Ray R, Lindsay AC, Padley SP, Rubens MB, Nicol ED (2013) Deriving coronary artery calcium scores from CT coronary angiography: a potential change to UK NICE guidelines: abstracts of the ESC (European Society of Cardiology) Congress 2013. Amsterdam, Netherlands. August 31–September 4, 2013. Eur Heart J 34(Suppl 1):1–1218

  8. Pavitt CW, Lindsay AC, Ray R, Zielke S, Padley SP, Rubens MB, Nicol ED (2013) Reducing patient radiation exposure: a novel method of coronary artery calcium scoring using images derived from CT angiography: abstracts of the 11th international conference of non-invasive cardiovascular imaging. J Nucl Cardiol 20(Suppl 1):S5–S108

  9. Gosling O, Loader R, Venables P, Rowles N, Morgan-Hughes G, Roobottom C, Cardiac CT (2010) are we underestimating the dose? A radiation dose study utilizing the 2007 ICRP tissue weighting factors and a cardiac specific scan volume. Clin Radiol 65(12):1013–1017

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kwon SW, Kim YJ, Shim J, Sung JM, Han ME, Kang DW et al (2011) Coronary artery calcium scoring does not add prognostic value to standard 64-section CT angiography protocol in low-risk patients suspected of having coronary artery disease. Radiology 259(1):92–99

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bland JM, Altman DG (1999) Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Stat Methods Med Res 8(2):135–160

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Achenbach S, Ropers U, Kuettner A, Anders K, Pflederer T, Komatsu S et al (2008) Randomized comparison of 64-slice single- and dual-source computed tomography coronary angiography for the detection of coronary artery disease. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 1(2):177–186

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Chung H, McClelland RL, Katz R, Carr JJ, Budoff MJ (2008) Repeatability limits for measurement of coronary artery calcified plaque with cardiac CT in the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 190(2):W87–W92

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Min JK, Dunning A, Lin FY, Achenbach S, Al-Mallah M, Budoff MJ et al (2011) Age- and sex-related differences in all-cause mortality risk based on coronary computed tomography angiography findings results from the International Multicenter CONFIRM (Coronary CT Angiography Evaluation for Clinical Outcomes: An International Multicenter Registry) of 23,854 patients without known coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 58(8):849–860

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Greenland P, Bonow RO, Brundage BH, Budoff MJ, Eisenberg MJ, Grundy SM et al (2007) ACCF/AHA 2007 clinical expert consensus document on coronary artery calcium scoring by computed tomography in global cardiovascular risk assessment and in evaluation of patients with chest pain: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Clinical Expert Consensus Task Force (ACCF/AHA Writing Committee to Update the 2000 Expert Consensus Document on Electron Beam Computed Tomography) developed in collaboration with the Society of Atherosclerosis Imaging and Prevention and the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 49(3):378–402

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Joshi PH, Blaha MJ, Blumenthal RS, Blankstein R, Nasir K (2012) What is the role of calcium scoring in the age of coronary computed tomographic angiography? J Nucl Cardiol 19(6):1226–1235

  17. Meijboom WB, van Mieghem CAG, Mollet NR, Pugliese F, Weustink AC, van Pelt N et al (2007) 64-Slice computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with high, intermediate, or low pretest probability of significant coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 50(15):1469–1475

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Gottlieb I, Miller JM, Arbab-Zadeh A, Dewey M, Clouse ME, Sara L et al (2010) The absence of coronary calcification does not exclude obstructive coronary artery disease or the need for revascularization in patients referred for conventional coronary angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 55(7):627–634

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Sarwar A, Shaw LJ, Shapiro MD, Blankstein R, Hoffmann U, Hoffman U et al (2009) Diagnostic and prognostic value of absence of coronary artery calcification. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2(6):675–688

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Bischoff B, Hein F, Meyer T, Krebs M, Hadamitzky M, Martinoff S et al (2010) Comparison of sequential and helical scanning for radiation dose and image quality: results of the Prospective Multicenter Study on Radiation Dose Estimates of Cardiac CT Angiography (PROTECTION) I Study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 194(6):1495–1499

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Leschka S, Kim C-H, Baumueller S, Stolzmann P, Scheffel H, Marincek B et al (2010) Scan length adjustment of CT coronary angiography using the calcium scoring scan: effect on radiation dose. AJR Am J Roentgenol 194(3):W272–W277

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Voros S, Qian Z (2012) Agatston score tried and true: by contrast, can we quantify calcium on CTA? J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 6(1):45–47

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Hong C, Becker CR, Schoepf UJ, Ohnesorge B, Bruening R, Reiser MF (2002) Coronary artery calcium: absolute quantification in nonenhanced and contrast-enhanced multi-detector row CT studies. Radiology 223(2):474–480

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None disclosed.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christopher W. Pavitt.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pavitt, C.W., Harron, K., Lindsay, A.C. et al. Deriving coronary artery calcium scores from CT coronary angiography: a proposed algorithm for evaluating stable chest pain. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 30, 1135–1143 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-014-0439-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-014-0439-3

Keywords

Navigation