Skip to main content
Log in

High-pitch dual-source CT coronary angiography: systolic data acquisition at high heart rates

  • Cardiac
  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To assess the effect of systolic data acquisition for electrocardiography (ECG)-triggered high-pitch computed tomography (CT) on motion artefacts of coronary arteries in patients with high heart rates (HRs).

Methods

Eighty consecutive patients (15 women, age 67 ± 14 years) with HR ≥70 bpm underwent CT angiography of the thoracic aorta (CTA) on 128-slice dual-source CT in ECG-triggered high-pitch acquisition mode (pitch = 3.2) set at 60% (group A, n = 40) or 30% (group B, n = 40) of the RR interval. Two blinded readers graded coronary artery image quality on a three-point scale. Radiation doses were calculated.

Results

Inter-observer agreement in grading image quality of the 1,154 coronary segments was good (κ = 0.62). HRs were similar in groups A and B (85 ± 13 bpm vs 85 ± 14 bpm, p not significant). Significantly fewer coronary segments with non-diagnostic image quality occurred (i.e. score 3) in group B than in group A [2.8% (16/579) vs 8.3% (48/575), p < 0.001]. Seventeen patients (42.5%) of group A and 12 patients (30.0%) of group B had at least one non-diagnostic segment. Effective radiation doses were 2.3 ± 0.3 mSv for chest CTA.

Conclusion

A systolic acquisition window for high-pitch dual-source CTA in patients with high HRs (≥70 bpm) significantly improves coronary artery image quality at a low radiation dose.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Raff GL, Gallagher MJ, O’Neill WW, Goldstein JA (2005) Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary angiography using 64-slice spiral computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 46:552–557

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Scheffel H, Alkadhi H, Plass A et al (2006) Accuracy of dual-source CT coronary angiography: first experience in a high pre-test probability population without heart rate control. Eur Radiol 16:2739–2747

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Weustink AC, Meijboom WB, Mollet NR et al (2007) Reliable high-speed coronary computed tomography in symptomatic patients. J Am Coll Cardiol 50:786–794

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Johnson TR, Nikolaou K, Busch S et al (2007) Diagnostic accuracy of dual-source computed tomography in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease. Invest radiol 42:684–691

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ropers U, Ropers D, Pflederer T et al (2007) Influence of heart rate on the diagnostic accuracy of dual-source computed tomography coronary angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 50:2393–2398

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Leschka S, Stolzmann P, Desbiolles L et al (2009) Diagnostic accuracy of high-pitch dual-source CT for the assessment of coronary stenoses: first experience. Eur Radiol 19:2896–2903

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Nieman K, Rensing BJ, van Geuns RJ et al (2002) Non-invasive coronary angiography with multislice spiral computed tomography: impact of heart rate. Heart 88:470–474

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hoffmann MH, Shi H, Manzke R et al (2005) Noninvasive coronary angiography with 16-detector row CT: effect of heart rate. Radiology 234:86–97

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Achenbach S, Ropers D, Holle J, Muschiol G, Daniel WG, Moshage W (2000) In-plane coronary arterial motion velocity: measurement with electron-beam CT. Radiology 216:457–463

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Chung CS, Karamanoglu M, Kovacs SJ (2004) Duration of diastole and its phases as a function of heart rate during supine bicycle exercise. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 287:H2003–H2008

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Herzog C, Arning-Erb M, Zangos S et al (2006) Multi-detector row CT coronary angiography: influence of reconstruction technique and heart rate on image quality. Radiology 238:75–86

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Wintersperger BJ, Nikolaou K, von Ziegler F et al (2006) Image quality, motion artifacts, and reconstruction timing of 64-slice coronary computed tomography angiography with 0.33-second rotation speed. Invest radiol 41:436–442

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Leschka S, Wildermuth S, Boehm T et al (2006) Noninvasive coronary angiography with 64-section CT: effect of average heart rate and heart rate variability on image quality. Radiology 241:378–385

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Weustink AC, Mollet NR, Pugliese F et al (2008) Optimal electrocardiographic pulsing windows and heart rate: effect on image quality and radiation exposure at dual-source coronary CT angiography. Radiology 248:792–798

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Seifarth H, Wienbeck S, Pusken M et al (2007) Optimal systolic and diastolic reconstruction windows for coronary CT angiography using dual-source CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 189:1317–1323

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Araoz PA, Kirsch J, Primak AN et al (2009) Optimal image reconstruction phase at low and high heart rates in dual-source CT coronary angiography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 25:837–845

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Adler G, Meille L, Rohnean A, Sigal-Cinqualbre A, Capderou A, Paul JF (2009) Robustness of end-systolic reconstructions in coronary dual-source CT angiography for high heart rate patients. Eur Radiol. doi:10.1007/s00330-009-1642-9

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Bamberg F, Sommer WH, Schenzle JC et al (2009) Systolic acquisition of coronary dual-source computed tomography angiography: feasibility in an unselected patient population. Eur Radiol. doi:10.1007/s00330-009-1680-3

    Google Scholar 

  19. Petersilka M, Bruder H, Krauss B, Stierstorfer K, Flohr TG (2008) Technical principles of dual source CT. Eur J Radiol 68:362–368

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Austen WG, Edwards JE, Frye RL et al (1975) A reporting system on patients evaluated for coronary artery disease. Report of the Ad Hoc Committee for Grading of Coronary Artery Disease, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery, American Heart Association. Circ 51(4 Suppl):5–40

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Menzel H, Schibilla H, Teunen D (2000) European guidelines on quality criteria for computed tomography, Publication no. EUR 16262 EN. European Commission, Luxembourg

  22. Morin RL (1988) Monte Carlo simulation in the radiological sciences. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  23. Halliburton SS, Sola S, Kuzmiak SA et al (2008) Effect of dual-source cardiac computed tomography on patient radiation dose in a clinical setting: comparison to single-source imaging. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2:392–400

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Achenbach S, Marwan M, Ropers D et al (2009) Coronary computed tomography angiography with a consistent dose below 1 mSv using prospectively electrocardiogram-triggered high-pitch spiral acquisition. Eur Heart J 31(3):340–346

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Lell M, Hinkmann F, Anders K et al (2009) High-pitch electrocardiogram-triggered computed tomography of the chest: initial results. Invest radiol 44:728–733

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Goetti R, Baumuller S, Feuchtner G et al (2010) High-pitch dual-source CT angiography of the thoracic and abdominal aorta: is simultaneous coronary artery assessment possible? AJR Am J Roentgenol 194:938–944

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Gerber TC, Kuzo RS, Morin RL (2005) Techniques and parameters for estimating radiation exposure and dose in cardiac computed tomography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 21:165–176

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. McCollough CH, Primak AN, Saba O et al (2007) Dose performance of a 64-channel dual-source CT scanner. Radiology 243:775–784

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Shapiro MD, Dodd JD, Kalva S et al (2009) A comprehensive electrocardiogram-gated 64-slice multidetector computed tomography imaging protocol to visualize the coronary arteries, thoracic aorta, and pulmonary vasculature in a single breath hold. J Comput Assist Tomogr 33:225–232

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Johnson TR, Nikolaou K, Becker A et al (2008) Dual-source CT for chest pain assessment. Eur Radiol 18:773–780

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sebastian Leschka.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Goetti, R., Feuchtner, G., Stolzmann, P. et al. High-pitch dual-source CT coronary angiography: systolic data acquisition at high heart rates. Eur Radiol 20, 2565–2571 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-010-1838-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-010-1838-z

Keywords

Navigation