Table 3

Dose–response evaluation of cumulated cardioversion proportion of biphasic electrical cardioversion of atrial fibrillation using self-adhesive patches in anterolateral versus anteroposterior positions

Energy (J)	Trial	Anterolateral cardioversion proportion	Anteroposterior cardioversion proportion
70	Walsh et al25 2005	54/150	45/144
100	Walsh et al25 2005	99/150	74/144
	Brazdzionyte et al24 2006	40/55	29/48
	Schmidt et al26 2021	126/233	77/234
120	Siaplaouras et al23 2005	47/63	47/60
150	Siaplaouras et al23 2005	55/63	54/60
	Walsh et al25 2005	123/150	109/144
	Brazdzionyte et al24 2006	52/55	41/48
	Muñoz-Martínez et al15 2010*	32/46	18/45
	Schmidt et al26 2021	175/233	125/234
200	Siaplaouras et al23 2005	60/63	57/60
	Walsh et al25 2005	143/150	127/144
	Brazdzionyte et al24 2006	53/55	46/48
	Muñoz-Martínez et al15 2010, first shock*	39/46	27/45
	Muñoz-Martínez et al15 2010, second shock	41/46	32/45
	Schmidt et al26 2021	200/233	162/234
300	Brazdzionyte et al24 2006	54/55	47/48
360	Schmidt et al26 2021	216/233	200/234

*Data shared by the author. In the dose–response analyses, we used the first of the two shocks.