Table 5

Compilation of data from various studies using ST elevation in lead III >lead II as a predictor of RCA culprit lesion

StudyTPFPFNTNSensitivity (95% CI)Specificity
(95% CI)
Positive predictive value (95% CI)Negative predictive value (95% CI)
Ahahs9442280.96 (0.85 to 0.99)0.80 (0.44 to 0.97)0.96 (0.84 to 0.99)0.80 (0.44 to 0.96)
Almansori104648275890.86 (0.83 to 0.89)0.52 (0.44 to 0.60)0.85 (0.82 to 0.88)0.54 (0.46 to 0.62)
Baptista11349460.89 (0.75 to 0.97)0.40 (0.16 to 0.68)0.79 (0.64 to 0.90)0.60 (0.27 to 0.86)
Chia127022180.97 (0.90 to 1.00)0.90 (0.68 to 0.99)0.97 (0.89 to 1.00)0.90 (0.69 to 0.98)
Chiang13316120.97 (0.84 to 1.00)0.25 (0.03 to 0.65)0.84 (0.67 to 0.93)0.67 (0.13 to 0.98)
Fiol14444690.88 (0.76 to 0.95)0.69 (0.39 to 0.91)0.92 (0.79 to 0.97)0.60 (0.33 to 0.83)
Herz1553113160.80 (0.69 to 0.89)0.94 (0.71 to 1.00)0.98 (0.89 to 1.00)0.55 (0.36 to 0.73)
Huang1616016270.96 (0.92 to 0.99)0.96 (0.81 to 1.00)0.99 (0.96 to 1.00)0.82 (0.64 to 0.92)
Jin17288840960.88 (0.84 to 0.91)0.92 (0.85 to 0.97)0.97 (0.95 to 0.99)0.71 (0.62 to 0.78)
Kabakci18114109160.93 (0.87 to 0.97)0.62 (0.85 to 0.970.92 (0.85 to 0.96)0.64 (0.43 to 0.81)
Kanei198185120.94 (0.87 to 0.98)0.60 (0.36 to 0.81)0.91 (0.83 to 0.96)0.71 (0.44 to 0.89)
Nair20233220.92 (0.74 to 0.99)0.40 (0.05 to 0.85)0.88 (0.69 to 0.97)0.50 (0.09 to 0.91)
Sun2157913110.81 (0.70 to 0.90)0.55 (0.32 to 0.77)0.86 (0.75 to 0.93)0.46 (0.26 to 0.67)
Taglieri222484622490.92 (0.88 to 0.95)0.52 (0.41 to 0.62)0.84 (0.80 to 0.88)0.69 (0.57 to 0.79)
Verouden237501031451330.84 (0.81 to 0.86)0.56 (0.50 to 0.63)0.88 (0.86 to 0.90)0.48 (0.42 to 0.54)
Wong24142118160.95 (0.90 to 0.98)0.59 (0.39 to 0.78)0.93 (0.87 to 0.96)0.67 (0.45 to 0.84)
Zhan2511515230.98 (0.94 to 1.00)0.17 (0.04 to 0.41)0.88 (0.81 to 0.93)0.60 (0.17 to 0.93)
Zimetbaum538014170.73 (0.59 to 0.84)1.00 (0.80 to 1.00)1.00 (0.89 to 1.00)0.55 (0.36 to 0.72)
Total2756320369530
3076 (3>2)899 (2>3)
  • FN, False negative; FP, False positive; RCA, right coronary artery; TN, True negative; TP, True positive.