Table 3

Detailed description of patients with complications according to the VARC criteria, and unsuccessful use of the iSleeve sheath

PatientiSleeve unsuccessfulVARC major vascular complicationVARC major bleeding complicationVARC minor vascular complicationAgeSexAccess vessel diameterCalcification (0–3)Tortuosity (0–3)SFAR
1Dissection and thrombus distal to puncture site, required aspiration and vascular surgeryBleeding from access site requiring transfusion of two units of blood87Female5.8221.26
2Pseudoaneurysm at access site leading to major bleedingBleeding at access site requiring transfusion of three units of bloodPseudoaneurysm at access site89Female5.4311.35
3Pseudoaneurysm at access site leading to major bleedingBleeding at access site with drop in haemoglobin level of 33.0 g/LPseudoaneurysm at access site85Male5.3211.38
4Occlusion of femoral artery after MANTA, required vascular surgeryBleeding after vascular surgery requiring transfusion of two units of blood80Female3.9321.87
5Bleeding at access site with unplanned endovascular stenting76Female4.1211.78
6Stenosis at access site with unplanned endovascular balloon therapy74Female6111.22
7Bleeding at access site with unplanned endovascular stenting86Female5211.46
8Bleeding at access site with unplanned endovascular balloon therapy95Female4.9211.49
9Femoral occlusion with unplanned endovascular balloon therapy71Male4.4221.66
10Could not pass stent in iliac artery with any sheath or valve prosthesis -88Male5.6321.30
11Damaged sheath85Female5.5111.33
12Sheath kinked81Male8120.91
13Invagination of iSleeve after valve delivery85Female4.7221.55
  • SFAR, sheath-to-femoral artery ratio; VARC, Valve Academic Research Consortium.