Table 3

Comparison of different parameters on CT and echo in patients with Vmax≥4 m/s and/or MG≥40 mm Hg and consistent (CT-AVA≤1 cm2) and inconsistent grading (CT-AVA>1 cm2)

Imaging criteriaAll patientsConsistent gradingInconsistent gradingP value
Number of patients (%)292 (65)225 (77)67 (23)
Age, years±SD81.3±8.482.9±6.875.9±10.8<0.001
AVCS, median (IQR)3499 (2383–4661)3855 (2800–4940)2141 (1664–3000)<0.001
CT-AVA, mean cm2 (±SD)0.90 (0.3)0.76 (0.14)1.32 (0.25)<0.001
E-AVA, mean cm2 (±SD)0.65 (0.2)0.60 (0.2)0.79 (0.16)<0.001
Vmax, mean m/s (IQR)4.5 (4.2–5.0)4.6 (4.2–5.0)4.2 (4.2–5.0)<0.001
MG, mean mm Hg (±SD)48 (42–61)52 (44–62)40 (37–51)<0.001
Velocity ratio (±SD)0.21 (0.07)0.19 (0.06)0.25 (0.07)<0.001
E-LVEF, % (±SD)58.8 (12.3)58.6 (12.2)59.7 (13.7)0.51
CT-LVEF, % (±SD)62.0 (15.7)60.9 (15.4)65.7 (13.7)0.03
E-SVI (±SD)38.9 (12.5)37.6 (11.7)43.6 (14.3)<0.001
CT-SVI (±SD)41.2 (10.8)39.6 (10.2)46.8 (11.1)<0.001
LVOT Qmean, cm3/s (±SD)203 (62)193 (55)238 (70)<0.001
  • AVA, aortic valve area; AVCS, aortic valve calcium score; E-AVA, echo AVA; E-LVEF, echo left ventricular ejection fraction;E-SVI, echo stroke volume index; LVOT, left ventricular outflow tract; MG, mean pressure gradient; Qmean, mean flow rate; Vmax, maximum flow velocity.