Table 3

Univariable and multivariable analyses of the association between BAV and LVNC criteria

Univariable analysesMultivariable analyses
OR (95% CI)P valuesModel 1
OR (95% CI)
P valuesModel 2
OR (95% CI)
P valuesModel 3
OR (95% CI)
P values
Jenni et al (NC/C >2.0, end-systole)
 BAV0.53 (0.21 to 1.32)0.170.49 (0.14 to 1.69)0.260.14 (0.02 to 1.24)0.080.09 (0.01 to 0.87)0.04
Petersen et al (NC/C >2.3, end-diastole)
 BAV0.38 (0.19 to 0.77)0.0070.51 (0.22 to 1.21)0.120.46 (0.18 to 1.21)0.110.37 (0.13 to 1.06)0.06
Fazio et al (NC/C >2.5, end-diastole)
 BAV0.34 (0.17 to 0.68)0.0020.40 (0.17 to 0.91)0.030.33 (0.13 to 0.83)0.020.22 (0.08 to 0.62)0.004
All three criteria fulfilled
 BAV0.45 (0.17 to 1.18)0.100.49 (0.14 to 1.70)0.260.16 (0.02 to 1.37)0.090.10 (0.01 to 0.94)0.04
  • Model 1: adjusted for age, sex and BAV.

  • Model 2: adjusted for age, sex, BAV and valve dysfunction.

  • Model 3: adjusted for age, sex, BAV, valve dysfunction, LVMi, LVEDVi and LVEF.

  • BAV, bicuspid aortic valve;LVEDVi, LVEDV indexed by BSA;LVEF, left ventricle ejection fraction;LVMi, LVM indexed by BSA;LVNC, left ventricle non-compaction;NC/C, non-compacted/compacted myocardium.