Table 3

Procedural data and Doppler echocardiographic data post-ViV according to the presence or absence of suboptimal aortic valve haemodynamic performance after ViV

Whole cohortValve haemodynamics after ViVP values
n=79Adequate:
MG <20 mm Hg and AR ≤mild n=31 (39.2%)
Suboptimal:
MG ≥20 mm Hg and/or AR ≥moderate n=48 (60.8%)
Procedural data
Balloon-expandable THV, n (%)49 (62.0)19 (61.3)30 (62.5)0.914
THV size (≤23), n (%)55 (69.6)19 (61.3)36 (75.0)0.196
THV model, n (%)0.484
 SAPIEN/XT/349 (62.0)19 (61.3)30 (62.5)
 CoreValve/Evolut R28 (35.4)12 (38.7)16 (33.3)
 Portico2 (2.5)0 (0.0)2 (4.2)
Access, n (%)0.224
 Transfemoral47 (59.5)16 (51.6)31 (64.6)
 Transapical23 (29.1)12 (38.7)11 (22.9)
 Transcarotid6 (7.6)1 (3.2)5 (10.4)
 Transaortic3 (3.8)2 (6.5)1 (2.1)
Procedural success*, n (%)62 (78.5)24 (77.4)38 (79.2)0.854
Coronary occlusion, n (%)1 (1.3)0 (0)1 (2.1)1.0
More than one THV, n (%)8 (10.1)3 (9.7)5 (10.4)1.0
Need of pacemaker, n (%)3 (3.8)0 (0.0)3 (6.3)0.276
New onset of atrial fibrillation, n (%)5 (6.8)2 (6.7)3 (6.8)1.0
Major vascular complication, n (%)2 (2.5)1 (3.2)1 (2.1)1.0
Major bleeding, n (%)3 (3.8)1 (3.2)2 (4.2)1.0
THV malposition or embolisation, n (%)2 (2.5)0 (0.0)2 (4.2)0.517
Hospital stay, days6.9±4.97.7±5.56.3±4.40.214
Doppler echocardiographic data post-ViV
MG, mm Hg22.2±9.314.1±3.927.3±8.0<0.0001
EOA, cm2 1.15±0.381.29±0.291.06±0.400.009
EOAi, cm2/m2 0.62±0.210.73±0.180.56±0.200.0003
Doppler velocity index0.30±0.080.34±0.080.27±0.07<0.0001
PPM, n (%)<0.0001
 None11 (13.9)8 (25.8)3 (6.3)
 Moderate14 (17.7)12 (38.7)2 (4.2)
 Severe54 (68.4)11 (35.5)43 (89.6)
LVEF, %57.5±11.755.8±10.758.7±11.70.584
Stroke volume, mL70.2±18.572.0±24.067.9±14.20.684
AR, n (%)0.035
 None26 (33.3)8 (26.7)18 (37.5)
 Trace39 (50.0)16 (53.3)23 (47.9)
 Mild10 (12.8)6 (20.0)4 (8.3)
 Moderate3 (3.9)0 (0.0)3 (6.3)
 Severe0 (0.0)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)
Suboptimal valve function
 MG ≥20 mm Hg, n (%)45 (57.0)0 (0.0)45 (93.8)
 AR ≥moderate, n (%)3 (3.9)0 (0.0)3 (6.3)
Change from pre-ViV
 ΔMG, mm Hg−14.4±18.3−13.7±16.6−14.8±19.50.806
 ΔEOA, cm2 +0.10±0.47+0.07±0.62+0.12±0.360.646
 ΔEOAi, cm2/m2 +0.05±0.26+0.04±0.35+0.06±0.190.698
 ΔAR, grade−1.8±1.4−2.1±1.4−1.6±1.30.104
Change from post-SAVR
 ΔMG, mm Hg+7.8±7.9+3.5±4.9+10.8±8.30.0003
 ΔEOA, cm2 −0.44±0.40−0.42±0.40−0.46±0.400.668
 ΔEOAi, cm2/m2 −0.24±0.21−0.23±0.22−0.24±0.210.873
 ΔAR, grade+0.28±0.91+0.13±0.66+0.38±1.020.359
  • *Procedural success was defined as the absence of any major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular event (stroke, myocardial infarction, in-hospital death) and device success (no more than one transcatheter prosthesis, no procedural death and no vascular complication).

  • AR, aortic regurgitation; EOA, effective orifice area; EOAi, indexed EOA; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; MG, mean transvalvular pressure gradient; PPM, prosthesis–patient mismatch; SAVR, surgical aortic valve replacement; THV, transcatheter heart valve; ViV, valve-in-valve implantation.