Table 4

Univariable and multivariable analyses of the factors associated with post-ViV high residual gradient and/or ≥moderate aortic regurgitation

High gradient
(MG ≥20 mm Hg)
High gradient and/or
AR ≥moderate
Univariable analysisMultivariable analysisUnivariable analysisMultivariable analysis
OR
(95% CI)
P valuesOR
(95% CI)
P valuesOR
(95% CI)
P valuesOR
(95% CI)
P values
Male1.37
(0.54 to 3.50)
0.5091.75
(0.68 to 4.52)
0.245
BP type (stented vs stentless)4.29
(1.50 to 12.28)
0.0072.40
(0.88 to 6.55)
0.087
BP type
 Stented pericardial vs stentless5.26
(1.69 to 16.42)
0.0042.95
(0.99 to 8.79)
0.053
 Stented porcine vs stentless2.95
(0.82 to 10.58)
0.0981.65
(0.48 to 5.69)
0.428
BP size (≤21 mm)2.17
(0.80 to 5.84)
0.1271.73
(0.64 to 4.66)
0.283
BP IOD, mm0.72
(0.58 to 0.91)
0.0050.86
(0.71 to 1.05)
0.135
BP mode of failure (AS or mixed vs AR)6.11
(2.14 to 17.46)
0.0015.37
(1.77 to 16.30)
0.0033.56
(1.32 to 9.59)
0.0123.02
(1.08 to 8.42)
0.035
Pre-existing PPM (≥moderate)4.99
(1.89 to 13.17)
0.0014.38
(1.55 to 12.37)
0.0053.36
(1.31 to 8.67)
0.0122.87
(1.08 to 7.65)
0.035
THV type (balloon expandable vs self-expanding)1.27
(0.51 to 3.17)
0.6111.05
(0.42 to 2.67)
0.914
THV design (intra-annular vs supra-annular)1.55
(0.61 to 3.93)
0.3561.26
(0.49 to 3.23)
0.626
THV size (≤23 mm)3.16
(1.17 to 8.55)
0.0241.90
(0.72 to 5.02)
0.199
  • AR, aortic regurgitation; AS, aortic stenosis; BP, bioprosthesis; IOD, internal orifice diameter; MG, mean transaortic gradient; mixed, mixed dysfunction; PPM, prosthesis–patient mismatch; THV, transcatheter heart valve; ViV, valve-in-valve.