Table 4

Risk of bias of included observational studies

Study (author, year, setting)ContextStudy designBiasRisk of bias assessment
SDMNDC
Maron, 2010 (USA and Canada)39Stable CHDProspective cohortLowLowLowHighHigh risk of confounding
Lafitte, 2009 (France)36ACS in hospitalProspective cohortHighHighHighHighHigh risk of bias
Bushnell, 2011 (USA)30Ischaemic stroke/TIA in hospitalRetrospective cohortLowLowLowLowLow risk of bias
Jackevicius, 2008 (Canada)31AMI in hospitalRetrospective cohortLowLowLowLowLow risk of bias
Khanderia, 2005 (USA)40CABG in hospitalRetrospective case–controlHighLowLowHighHigh risk of bias
Glader, 2010 (Sweden)32Acute stroke in hospitalProspective cohortLowLowLowLowLow risk of bias
O'Brien, 2015 (USA)37NSTEMI in hospitalRetrospective cohortLowLowLowHighLow risk of bias, but high risk of confounding
Castellano, 2014 (Argentina, Brazil, Italy, Paraguay and Spain)25Aged >40 years with AMI within last 2 yearsCross-sectional studyHighLowLowHighHigh risk of bias—selection bias and confounding
Ko, 2005 (Canada)18AMI aged ≥65 years in hospitalRetrospective cohortLowLowLowUnclearLow risk of bias but unclear risk of confounding
Harats, 2005 (Israel)33CHD in hospitalCross-sectional then prospective cohortLowHighLowHighHigh risk of bias due to differential misclassification and confounding
Winkelmayer, 2007 (Austria)34AMI in hospitalRetrospective cohortLowLowLowHighLow risk of bias but high risk of confounding
Ye, 2007 (USA)35CHD and initiated statin in hospitalRetrospective cohortLowLowLowHighLow risk of bias but high risk of confounding
Mathews, 2015 (USA)38ACS in hospitalProspective cohortLowLowLowHighLow risk of bias but high risk of confounding
  • Bias: S, selection; DM, differential misclassification; ND, non-differential misclassification; C, confounding. AMI, acute myocardial infarction; CABG, coronary artery bypass graft; CHD, coronary heart disease; NSTEMI, non-ST elevation myocardial infarction; ACS, acute coronary syndrome; TIA, transient ischaemic attack.