@article {Gatzkee000889, author = {Nora Gatzke and Nadija G{\"u}c and Philipp Hillmeister and Andr{\'e} D{\"u}lsner and Ferdinand Le Noble and Eva Elina Buschmann and Maja Ingwersen and Peter Bramlage and Ivo R Buschmann}, title = {Cardiovascular drugs attenuated myocardial resistance against ischaemia-induced and reperfusion-induced injury in a rat model of repetitive occlusion}, volume = {5}, number = {2}, elocation-id = {e000889}, year = {2018}, doi = {10.1136/openhrt-2018-000889}, publisher = {Archives of Disease in childhood}, abstract = {Objective We investigated the impact of cardioprotective drugs on ST-elevation, arrhythmias and infarct size in a rat model of repetitive coronary artery occlusion.Methods Seventy Sprague-Dawley rats were randomised to two control and five treatment groups. Placebo was either implantation of a pneumatic occluder onto the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) without starting repetitive occlusion (SHAM) or subsequent RO of the LAD over 10 days without medication (ROP). Treatment groups underwent RO and additionally received nitroglycerin (NTG), metoprolol, verapamil (VER), ranolazine (RAN) or candesartan (CAN). Two weeks after the intervention, rats underwent a single, sustained LAD occlusion followed by reperfusion. To evaluate differences in cardiac resistance against myocardial ischaemia and reperfusion injury, cardiac surrogate parameters including maximal ST-elevation, arrhythmias and infarct size were assessed.Results Compared with sham, RO alone and RO plus nitroglycerin were associated with significantly lower maximal ST-elevation and percentage of infarcted myocardium (SHAM 0.12 mV, ROP 0.06 mV (p=0.004), NTG 0.05 mV (p=0.005); SHAM 16.2\%, ROP 6.6\% (p=0.008), NTG 5.9\% (p=0.006). Compared with RO alone, RO plus RAN was accompanied by increased ST-elevation (0.13 mV, p=0.018) and RO plusVER or CAN by more infarcted myocardium (14.2\%, p=0.004\% and 15.5\%, p=0.003, respectively). Rats treated with VER, RAN or CAN tended to severe arrhythmias more frequently than those of the control groups.Conclusions RO led to an increased myocardial resistance against ischaemia and reperfusion injury. Concomitant administration of nitroglycerin did not affect the efficacy of RO. Cardiovascular channel or receptor blockers reduced the efficacy of RO.}, URL = {https://openheart.bmj.com/content/5/2/e000889}, eprint = {https://openheart.bmj.com/content/5/2/e000889.full.pdf}, journal = {Open Heart} }