PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Jonathan Ludmir
AU  - Xinggang Liu
AU  - Anuj Gupta
AU  - Gautam V Ramani
AU  - Stanley S Liu
AU  - Sammy Zakaria
AU  - Avelino C Verceles
AU  - Nirav G Shah
AU  - Michael T McCurdy
AU  - Jennifer A Dammeyer
AU  - Giora Netzer
TI  - Cardiologist perceptions of family-centred rounds in cardiovascular clinical care
AID  - 10.1136/openhrt-2018-000834
DP  - 2018 Sep 01
TA  - Open Heart
PG  - e000834
VI  - 5
IP  - 2
4099  - http://openheart.bmj.com/content/5/2/e000834.short
4100  - http://openheart.bmj.com/content/5/2/e000834.full
SO  - Open Heart2018 Sep 01; 5
AB  - Objective Few data exist regarding physician attitudes and implementation of family-centred rounds (FCR) in cardiovascular care. This study aimed to assess knowledge and attitudes among cardiologists and cardiology fellows regarding barriers and benefits of FCRs.Methods An electronic, web-based questionnaire was nationally distributed to cardiology fellows and attending cardiologists.Results In total, 118 subjects were surveyed, comprising cardiologists (n=64, 54%) and cardiology fellows (n=54, 46%). Overall, 61% of providers reported participating in FCRs and 64% felt family participation on rounds benefits the patient. Both fellows and cardiologists agreed that family rounds eased family anxiety (fellows, 63%; cardiologists, 56%; p=0.53), improved communication between the medical team and the patient and family (fellows, 78%; cardiologists, 61%; p=0.18) and improved patient safety (fellows, 59%; cardiologists, 47%; p=0.43). Attitudes regarding enhancement of trainee education were similar (fellows, 69%; cardiologists, 55%; p=0.19). Fellows and cardiologists felt that family increased the duration of rounds (fellows, 78%; cardiologists, 80%; p=0.18) and led to less efficient rounds (fellows, 54%; cardiologists, 58%; p=0.27).Conclusion The majority of cardiologists and fellows believed that FCRs benefited families, communication and patient safety, but led to reduced efficiency and longer duration of rounds.