Discussion
We found that in patients with a history of CVD, hospitalisation for COVID-19 was significantly associated with an increased risk of MACE and death. Of all MACE, new onset of heart failure was the most common adverse event (11% of all patients), and the most frequent cause of death was respiratory failure (86%). Recent studies have shown the prominent role of heart failure, both as a risk factor for a severe clinical course and for mortality, that is, as a potential consequence of COVID-19 related myocardial injury.13 14
In addition, we found that history of COPD is an independent risk factor for MACE or death in patients hospitalised with COVID-19. Results from a meta-analysis have shown that in patients with history of COPD and ongoing smoking, the progression and outcomes of COVID-19 infection are more likely to be worse. In particular, the incidence of a severe course of COVID-19 in patients with pre-existing COPD was found to be fourfold higher than in individuals without COPD.15
The number of comorbidities in patients with COVID-19 is associated with higher risk of serious adverse events.16 In our population, 40% had between one and two comorbidities and 23% had ≥5 comorbidities. As reported since the beginning of the pandemic, age appears to be an independent risk factor for severe courses of COVID-19 infections.17 In our study, age was also identified as an independent risk factor for MACE or death in patients hospitalised with COVID-19, and this finding highlights the crucial importance to adjust for age. Results from the vast majority of studies on COVID-19 have not been age adjusted, and therefore, the impact of age still needs to be properly quantified.
Considering gender differences, our findings indicated that male sex is an additional independent risk factor for MACE or death in patients hospitalised with COVID-19, which is consistent with the literature.18 It has been described that women appear less susceptible to viral infections, probably because of differences in innate immunity, steroid hormones and factors related to sex chromosomes.19
Most of the laboratory values were associated with clinical outcomes (online supplemental table 1). In particular, patients experiencing MACE or death had higher levels of CRP, creatinine, increased AST/ALT ratio and leucocytes count and lower levels of haemoglobin. Higher CRP levels were significantly associated with in-hospital mortality. Interestingly, some recent studies have demonstrated that the use of dexamethasone reduces mortality in patients with COVID-19 while at the same time improving outcomes and decreasing CRP levels.20 21 Anaemia and high levels of creatinine were not identified as independent parameters associated with death. However, with an upper 95% CI greater than two, we cannot preclude those parameters as being further important laboratory features. Furthermore, the AST/ALT ratio was found to be higher in the groups of deceased patients compared with survivors, supporting the hypothesis of injury of the cardiac tissue rather than susceptibility of other organs.
Regarding CV risks factors, a large, multicentre study on hypertension and risk of COVID-19 indicated that 24% of patients with severe disease had hypertension, as compared with 14% of patients with non-severe disease, although that analysis was not adjusted for other clinical features.22 Conversely, our study shows that hypertension was not associated with MACE or death, even though almost half of the patients had hypertension (n=392, 47%), and that ARBs were found to be the medication most frequently prescribed (20%). There are still many controversies surrounding the effect of drugs inhibiting the renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system in patients with COVID-19.23–25 Mancia et al26 supported the hypothesis that the use of ACE inhibitors or ARBs did not affect the risk of COVID-19, nor the chances of better clinical outcomes in patients with COVID-19, compared with other antihypertensive medications. In our study, when considering all medications collected at admission, we did not find any association with the composite outcome, even after having adjusted for age. In particular, neither ACE inhibitors nor ARBs were associated with better or worse clinical outcomes (online supplemental table 2).
SARS-CoV-2 infection has also been associated with multiple direct and indirect CV complications, including myocarditis and venous thromboembolism.8 In our study, among patients without a history of CVD, 7% (41/562) presented a first event (either heart failure, major arrhythmia, non-fatal MI or non-fatal stroke). In total, we found only 3/839 cases of myocarditis, confirmed at cardiac MRI: acute myocarditis manifests across a variable range of clinical severity and remains a diagnostic challenge in the COVID-19 pandemic. One study suggested that 7% of COVID-19 related deaths were due to myocarditis, but the diagnosis was revealed only at autopsy.27
We found only 35/839 (4%) cases of venous thrombotic complications, including pulmonary embolism, portal vein thrombosis and deep vein thrombosis (table 2), which remain low compared with the literature.28 However, a recent study confirmed that venous thrombotic complications occurred only in 3.6% in patients with COVID-19 admitted in a non-ICU unit versus 13.6% in ICU patients.29
Contrary to current data, we did not find obesity to be associated with death, although there was a positive trend, including for MACE. Furthermore, active smoking was not associated with death (even if 95% CIs were extremely large).
Limitations
First, it is a monocentric observational study, and findings remain associated without causal inference, such as the role of arterial hypertension and the impact of antihypertensive medications. Although we used multivariable analyses, residual confounding and selection bias cannot be excluded. Second, several sources of bias may be present, including misclassification of some items. In particular, smoking status was determined from clinical charts, without direct elicitation with validated instruments with patients: this could explain the relatively small number of active smokers identified in our study. Third, we did not distinguish between type 1 and type 2 MI, but instead we considered altogether non-fatal MI. The reason for this is because we took the information of presence or absence of MI from the discharge letter, where the type of MI during hospitalisation was not specified. Lastly, there was a significant amount of missing data regarding some demographic parameters, such as patient’s height.