Article Text

Original research
Catheter ablation and mortality, stroke and heart failure readmission with atrial fibrillation
  1. Jannik Langtved Pallisgaard1,
  2. Morten Lock Hansen1,
  3. Anne-Marie Schjerning1,
  4. Arne Johannessen1,
  5. Thomas Alexander Gerds2,
  6. Finn Gustafsson3,
  7. Gunnar Hilmar Gislason1,
  8. Chriatian Torp-Pedersen4,
  9. Peter Karl Jacobsen3,
  10. Søren Lund Kristensen1,
  11. Lars Koeber3,
  12. Anders Munch2 and
  13. Morten Schou5
  1. 1Department of Cardiology, Gentofte, Copenhagen University Hospital, Hellerup, Hovedstaden, Denmark
  2. 2Department of Biostatistics, University of Copenhagen, Denmark, Copenhagen, Hovedstaden, Denmark
  3. 3Department of Cardiology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
  4. 4Department of Cardiology, Hillerød, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Hovedstaden, Denmark
  5. 5Department of Cardiology, Herlev, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev, Hovedstaden, Denmark
  1. Correspondence to Dr Jannik Langtved Pallisgaard; jannikjannik{at}


Background Recent randomised clinical trials have suggested prognostic benefits of catheter ablation in highly selected patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure (HF).

Objectives This study sought to identify the treatment effect associated with catheter ablation in a broad population of patients with AF and HF.

Methods Through nationwide administrative registers in Denmark, we estimated the 2-year average treatment effect (ATE) of catheter ablation for AF on a composite endpoint of HF readmission, stroke and all-cause mortality at 1-year and 5-year landmark analyses. The primary cohort was patients with AF before HF, and the second cohort of patients with HF before AF.

Results A total of 13 756 patients were included with 9904 patients in the primary cohort, and 3852 in the secondary. An ATE (95% CI) reduction of the composite endpoint of 7.0% (4.5% to 9.5%) was observed in the primary cohort and 11.8% (6.0% to 17.6%) in the secondary in the 1-year landmark analysis with a reduction in all-cause mortality of 5.8% (3.7%–7.8%) and 6.3% (0.9%–11.7%), respectively. At the 5-year landmark, catheter ablation was associated with reductions in the composite endpoint and all-cause mortality in the primary (4.7% (2.3% to 7.2%), and 3.6% (1.0% to 6.3%), respectively), but not in the secondary cohort.

Conclusions Ablation was associated with decreased risk of HF readmission, stroke and all-cause mortality in patients with AF and HF. The effect is most substantial in patients with AF before HF and with catheter ablation after 1 year from the diagnosis of both conditions.

  • atrial fibrillation
  • radiofrequency ablation
  • stroke
  • heart failure

This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See:

View Full Text

Statistics from

Supplementary materials

  • Supplementary Data

    This web only file has been produced by the BMJ Publishing Group from an electronic file supplied by the author(s) and has not been edited for content.


  • Twitter @jannik @CopCard @Pallisgaard_MD

  • Contributors JLP and MS helped in planning, conduction, reporting and were guarantors of the study. TAG and AM helped in planning and conduction. Reviewing was done by MLH, A-MS, AJ, FG, GHG, CT-P, PKJ, SLK and LK.

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests FG is an advisor for Abbott, Carmat; Corvia (unpaid) speaker: Novartis, Astra, Orion Pharma; and investigator for Alnylam.

  • Patient consent for publication Not required.

  • Ethics approval In Denmark, retrospective register studies do not require approval from the ethics committees. The Danish Data Protection Agency approved this study (ref. no.: 2007-58-0015/GEH-2014-016 I-Suite no.: 02734), and data were made available in an anonymised format such that specific individuals could not be identified.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

  • Data availability statement Data may be obtained from a third party and are not publicly available.

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.