You are here

  • Home
  • Archive
  • Volume 7, Issue 2
  • Vitamin K for kidney transplant organ recipients: investigating vessel stiffness (ViKTORIES): study rationale and protocol of a randomised controlled trial

Article Text

Article menu

Download PDFPDF

Cardiac risk factors and prevention
Protocol
Vitamin K for kidney transplant organ recipients: investigating vessel stiffness (ViKTORIES): study rationale and protocol of a randomised controlled trial
  1. Jennifer Susan Lees1,2,
  2. Kenneth Mangion1,
  3. Elaine Rutherford1,
  4. Miles D Witham3,
  5. Rosemary Woodward4,
  6. Giles Roditi1,4,
  7. Tracey Hopkins4,
  8. Katriona Brooksbank1,
  9. Alan G Jardine1 and
  10. Patrick B Mark1,4
  1. 1Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
  2. 2Renal Medicine, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Glasgow, UK
  3. 3AGE Research Group, NIHR Newcastle Biomedical Research Centre, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
  4. 4Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Glasgow, UK
  1. Correspondence to Dr Jennifer Susan Lees; jennifer.lees2{at}nhs.net

Abstract

Background Renal transplant recipients (RTRs) exhibit increased vascular stiffness and calcification; these parameters are associated with increased cardiovascular risk. Activity of endogenous calcification inhibitors such as matrix gla protein (MGP) is dependent on vitamin K. RTRs commonly have subclinical vitamin K deficiency. The Vitamin K in kidney Transplant Organ Recipients: Investigating vEssel Stiffness (ViKTORIES) study assesses whether vitamin K supplementation reduces vascular stiffness and calcification in a diverse population of RTR.

Methods and analysis ViKTORIES (ISRCTN22012044) is a single-centre, phase II, parallel-group, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of the effect of vitamin K supplementation in 90 prevalent RTR. Participants are eligible if they have a functioning renal transplant for >1 year. Those on warfarin, with atrial fibrillation, estimated glomerular filtration rate <15 mL/min/1.73 m2 or contraindications to MRI are excluded. Treatment is with vitamin K (menadiol diphosphate) 5 mg three times per week for 1 year or matching placebo. All participants have primary and secondary endpoint measures at 0 and 12 months. The primary endpoint is ascending aortic distensibility on cardiac MR imaging. Secondary endpoints include vascular calcification (coronary artery calcium score by CT), cardiac structure and function on MR, carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity, serum uncarboxylated MGP, transplant function, proteinuria and quality of life. The study is powered to detect 1.0×10–3 mm Hg-1 improvement in ascending aortic distensibility in the vitamin K group relative to placebo at 12 months. Analyses will be conducted as between-group differences at 12 months by intention to treat.

Discussion This trial may identify a novel, inexpensive and low-risk treatment to improve surrogate markers of cardiovascular risk in RTR.

  • risk factors
  • CT scanning
  • MRI
  • clinical trials
  • renal disease
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

https://doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2019-001070

Statistics from Altmetric.com

    Request Permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

    Background

    Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of premature mortality in patients with renal disease.1 For patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD), renal transplantation affords the greatest benefit in terms of CVD risk reduction compared with dialysis, but renal transplant recipients (RTR) remain at 3–4 times elevated CVD risk compared with the general population2 and die prematurely from CVD, often with a functioning kidney transplant.3 Among patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD), vascular stiffness and calcification are common,4 linked and associated with cardiovascular events and mortality.5–7 Standard secondary prevention therapies—such as maintenance blood pressure targets and cholesterol-lowering agents—are recommended in the transplant population,8 however, these strategies are inadequate in RTR with non-traditional risk factors for CVD.9 10

    The development and progression of vascular stiffness and calcification are heavily influenced by the activity of calcification inhibitors,11 such as matrix gla protein (MGP), osteocalcin and Gla-rich protein.12 These proteins are reliant on conversion to their active forms by a vitamin K-dependent post-translational modification (gamma carboxylation). Among RTR, vitamin K intake is inadequate13 and subclinical deficiency is prevalent and associated with CVD and mortality.14 By optimising the function of vitamin K-dependent calcification inhibitors, vitamin K supplementation may offer a cost-effective and low-risk treatment option to reduce long-term cardiovascular risk and mortality and maximise organ preservation in RTR. By testing vitamin K supplements at supraphysiological dose, we may nullify the confounder that patients with diet rich in vitamin K are ‘healthier’ overall, with lower CVD risk and better outcomes.15

    Trials of vitamin K to improve vascular stiffness and calcification show promising results in various populations.16 We designed the Vitamin K in kidney Transplant Organ Recipients: Investigating vEssel Stiffness (ViKTORIES trial) to investigate the hypothesis that vitamin K supplementation improves vascular stiffness and calcification over 1 year in prevalent RTR.

    Methods and analysis

    Trial design and participants

    The ViKTORIES trial is a single-centre, phase II, parallel-group, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in prevalent RTRs (figure 1). We enrol adult participants (18 years or over with a functioning renal transplant implanted >12 months and with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR—measured by the chronic kidney disease epidemiology collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation17) >15 mL/min/1.73 m2. Patients are excluded if they meet any of the following criteria: known permanent or paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, concurrent warfarin use, taking vitamin K or indication for vitamin K, allergy to gelatine, lactose or cellulose (constituent ingredients of the capsules or packing materials used to make the interventions), breast feeding or of childbearing potential, known glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficiency, life expectancy <12 months, standard contraindications to MRI18 or inability to provide written informed consent in English.

    Figure 1
    Figure 1

    ViKTORIES study design and timetable. ViKTORIES, Vitamin K in kidney Transplant Organ Recipients: Investigating vEssel Stiffness.

    Interventions

    Menadiol diphosphate is a synthetic, water-soluble form of vitamin K, licensed for use in the UK for treatment of haemorrhage associated with deficiency of vitamin K-dependent clotting factors. This form of vitamin K is likely to be better absorbed than standard fat-soluble forms in those with malabsorption syndromes. Using this form of vitamin K facilitates production of a matching placebo, in contrast to other licensed, liquid forms of vitamin K (phylloquinone).

    Interventions—either 5 mg menadiol diphosphate or matching placebo—are administered orally three times per week (Monday, Wednesday and Friday) for 1 year. This dose of menadiol diphosphate was selected to ensure excess vitamin K was present for use as cofactor for vitamin K-dependent carboxylation. Size 4 gelatine capsules are prepared containing menadiol diphosphate 5 mg and packed with microcrystalline cellulose Ph. Eur. (Tayside Pharmaceuticals, Dundee, UK). Identical capsules are packed with microcrystalline cellulose Ph. Eur. as placebo.

    Menadiol diphosphate was originally sourced from licensed 10 mg tablets (Alliance Pharmaceuticals, Chippenham, UK) which were crushed and packed into capsules at the desired 5 mg dose. Due to a supply issue of licensed menadiol tablets after study commencement, capsules are now manufactured using 5 mg menadiol diphosphate United States Pharmacopeia (USP) with lactose as packing material but all other manufacturing the same. No interruption to dose or supply of dispensed study medication occurred due to this change of preparation.

    Randomisation sequence generation

    A computer-generated code list is provided by Sealed Envelope (Sealed Envelope, London, UK) in a password-protected file to drug manufacturer (Tayside Pharmaceuticals) to produce identical, sequentially numbered bottles containing either vitamin K or placebo. The code list is organised in random permuted blocks to facilitate unstratified 1:1 allocation ratio.

    Allocation concealment mechanism

    Randomisation is conducted by study investigators or trained research nurses using a custom-built, password-protected online system, created and maintained by Sealed Envelope.

    Implementation

    Local investigators (JSL, ER, PBM and AGJ) recruit participants from routine outpatient transplant clinic appointments in National Health Service (NHS) Greater Glasgow and Clyde (Scotland, UK) and enrol participants into the study, including obtaining informed consent and randomising according to methods detailed above.

    Blinding

    Local investigators, research nurses, pharmacy staff and participants are blinded to treatment allocation by use of numbered but otherwise identical medication bottles. Investigations including laboratory blood and urine samples, pulse wave velocity measurements, quality of life questionnaires are conducted by blinded study investigators or laboratory staff. After enrolment in the study, participants are given a 5-digit study ID (2-digit site code ‘01’ followed by 3-digit sequential screening code).

    Data capture

    A custom-designed electronic case report form is used, designed (by JSL) using Castor Electronic Data Capture (www.castoredc.com; Amsterdam, Netherlands).

    Outcomes

    Primary outcome

    The primary outcome is between-group difference in ascending aortic distensibility at 12 months measured by analysis of covariance (ANCOVA), adjusting for covariates of age, duration of ESKD and the baseline value of ascending aortic distensibility. Measured by cardiac MRI, aortic distensibility is an accurate and highly reproducible measure of aortic stiffness19 and is an early predictor of CVD and mortality.20–22

    Secondary outcomes

    All secondary outcomes are assessed as between-group differences at 12 months by ANCOVA, treating age, duration of ESKD and the baseline value of the outcome of interest as covariates. Secondary outcome measures include the following: coronary artery calcification score by non-contrast CT, carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity and augmentation index (SphygmoCor XCEL PWA and PWV software, AtCor Medical, Australia), MR measures of cardiac structure and function (descending aortic distensibility, left/right ventricular mass, function and strain, T1 and T2 relaxation times), markers of vitamin K status: desphospho-uncarboxylated MGP (dp-ucMGP), office blood pressure, ECG, bone metabolism and turnover (calcium, phosphate, parathyroid hormone, 25-hydroxyvitamin D), transplant function, proteinuria and quality of life (EuroQol-5 Dimension-5 level instrument23). Several other biomarkers will be tested as secondary outcomes if funding allows: calcification propensity (T50), elastin degradation products, bone metabolism and turnover (1-25hydrovitamin D, fibroblast growth factor-23, osteocalcin, fetuin, bone morphogenetic protein, tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase-5b), cardiovascular markers (high-sensitivity troponin, brain natriuretic peptide) and endothelial function (asymmetric dimethylarginine). Additional plasma, serum and urine are collected and frozen for future testing of unspecified biomarkers (with consent), which may include but are not limited to biomarkers of vitamin K status (other than dp-ucMGP) and tubulointerstitial fibrosis. Participants are asked to keep a food diary for 28 days for estimation of dietary vitamin K content.

    MR acquisition technique

    Participants undergo non-contrast cardiac MR on a Siemens Prisma 3T scanner (Siemens Inc, Erlangen, Germany) in the research MR facility at the Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow. An 18-channel body array is used anteriorly with a 32-channel spine array for posterior acquisition. Scans are gated by electrocardiography. Typical image acquisition sequence is summarised in table 1. Illustrative images of selected MRI sequences are displayed in figure 2.

    View this table:
    Table 1

    Typical MRI acquisition sequence

    Figure 2
    Figure 2

    Illustrative images of MRI scan acquisition. (A) Two-chamber localiser; (B) four-chamber localiser; (C) left ventricular short axis localiser; (D) haste in transverse plane; (E) haste in coronal plane; (F) aorta cine; (G) orthogonal ascending aorta; (H) orthogonal descending aorta; (I) transverse cine ascending aorta; (J) transverse cine descending aorta; (K) vertical long axis cine; (L) horizontal long axis cine; (M) left ventricular outflow tract cine; (N) left ventricular short axis stack cine; (O) T1 map mid segment; (P) T2 map mid segment; (Q) left ventricular short axis tagging mid segment.

    Cine imaging of the ascending and descending aorta is acquired for measurement of vessel size for distensibility measurements, at the level of the right pulmonary artery for the ascending aorta and approximately 10 cm above the diaphragm for the descending aorta. Typical imaging parameters are: field of view (FOV) 340×286 mm, slice thickness 7 mm, TR −20.7 ms, TE 1.51 ms, flip angle 50°, voxel size 1.33×1.33x7 mm.

    Left ventricular (LV) mass and function are assessed from balanced steady state free precession cine imaging (TrueFISP) in long axis planes (vertical long axis, horizontal long axis and LV outflow tract) then with sequential short axis LV cine images (7 mm slice thickness, 3 mm gap between slices) from the atrioventricular ring to the apex. Typical scan parameters are as follows for retrospectively gated TrueFISP 2d (tfi2d) sequence: FOV 340×286 mm, slice thickness 7 mm with 3 mm gap in short axis (SA) stack, repetition time (TR) – 41.4 ms, echo time (TE) 1.51 ms, flip angle 50°, voxel size 1.33×1.33 x 7 mm, 30 calculated phases.

    Parametric maps are acquired from three short-axis images at the basal, mid and apical segments of the left ventricle and tagging from a single short-axis image at the mid segment of the left ventricle. A T2 prepared sequence, BEAT map turbo flash 2d, was acquired with the following typical imaging parameters: FOV 360×288 mm, slice thickness 8 mm, TR—207 ms, TE 1.3 ms, flip angle 12°, voxel size 1.9×1.9 x 8 mm. T2 preparations x3 are imaged over a 9-heartbeat period with duration 0 ms, 30 ms, 55 ms and with a 3-heartbeat recovery period.

    A motion-corrected 2D BEAT map sequence (tfi2d) optimised for heart rate is used to acquire T1 maps. Typical imaging parameters are: FOV 360×306 mm, slice thickness 8 mm, TR—280 ms, TE 1.12 ms, flip angle 35°, TI 180 ms, voxel size 1.4×1.4 x 8mm. Two T1 preparations are imaged over an 11-heartbeat period with a starting T1 time of 100 ms with increment of 80 ms.

    MR image assessment

    MR images are analysed for primary and secondary endpoints as above using Argus (Siemens Inc, Erlangen, Germany) and Cvi42 (Circle Cardiovascular Imaging, Calgary AB, Canada) software by an investigator blinded to treatment allocation (JSL).

    Aortic distensibility analysis

    Aortic volumes are measured by manually tracing the endovascular border of the ascending and descending aorta (figure 3A/B). Non-invasive brachial blood pressure is recorded simultaneously with capture of cine images using a non-ferromagnetic cuff (Philips Expression MR400 and Expression IP5, MRI Devices, Knaresborough, UK), and aortic distensibility (mm Hg-1) in ascending and descending aorta calculated from the following equation21 24 25:

    Figure 3
    Figure 3

    A and B: contours drawn around the endovascular border of the ascending aorta (A) for estimation of ascending aortic distensibility and descending aorta (B) for assessment of descending aortic distensibility. C and D: endocardial (red) and epicardial (green) borders outlined at end-diastole (C) and end-systole (D) on short axis cine images to estimate left ventricular mass and function. Papillary muscles excluded from left ventricular mass measurements.

    AD=[Maximum aortic volume (mL)]–[Minimum aortic volume (mL)]

    [Minimum aortic volume (mL)]xPulse Pressure (mm Hg)

    Left/right ventricular mass and function analysis

    Endocardial and epicardial borders are outlined at end-diastole and end-systole on short axis cine images to estimate LV mass and function in standard fashion26 (figure 3C/D). Using body weight and height acquired immediately before scanning, the end-systolic and end-diastolic volumes and LV mass are indexed to body surface area.

    Strain

    Endocardial and epicardial contours are defined as above on LV short-axis views, and inferior reference point is defined at the insertion point of the right ventricle. LV and RV extent, endocardial and epicardial contours are defined at end-diastole and end-systole on vertical long axis and horizontal long axis views. Three-dimension (3D) left and right ventricular strain analysis is conducted using dedicated feature-tracking software.

    Parametric map analysis

    LV contours are defined on raw T1 and T2 images then copied onto the colour-enhanced spatially coregistered maps. The anterior right ventricular-septal insertion point is used as a reference, and both T1 and T2 maps analysed for 16 segments according to the American Heart Association (AHA) model (apex segment 17 excluded).27 User-defined semiautomated border delineation is used to create AHA regions of interest of similar size and shape, taking care not to overlap with other tissue interfaces. Relaxation times are measured in each of the 16 segments.

    Acceptable segments are identified by assessing individual segments for susceptibility and motion artefacts. Those segments affected by artefact are removed and a mean global T1 or T2 time calculated from the remaining segments. An average septal T1 or T2 time is calculated by using acceptable anteroseptal, inferoseptal and septal AHA segments (segment numbers 2, 3, 8, 9 and 14).

    Intra and interobserver variability

    There will be blinded reanalysis of n=20 randomly selected datasets, in random order, for intraobserver and interobserver variability for all primary and secondary MR outcomes above.

    CT Image acquisition

    Images for coronary artery calcification score are obtained using an Aquilion ONE Vision Edition CT scanner (Canon Medical Systems, Crawley, UK) in the Clinical Research Imaging Facility at the Queen Elizabeth University Hospital in Glasgow. Scans are acquired with a single heartbeat non-contrast volumetric scan; adaptive iterative dose reduction (AIDR) 3D iterative reconstruction is employed for radiation dose minimisation.

    CT image assessment

    Coronary artery calcification (Agatston) score28 is calculated using Vitrea Advanced Visualisation software (Vital Images Inc, Minnetonka, Minnesota, USA) by a consultant radiologist with 14 years experience blinded to treatment allocation (GHR), excluding segments with previous coronary artery stents in situ (figure 4).

    Figure 4
    Figure 4

    Cross-sectional, non-contrast CT images of the heart. Total coronary calcification score is calculated for each artery according to the density and area of calcification (arrows) observed in each artery. The sum of calcification scores in each artery gives a total coronary calcium score.

    Statistical considerations

    The ViKTORIES study has a statistical analysis plan in line with Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) guidelines. We will analyse differences between treatment and placebo groups by intention to treat as the primary analysis, and will conduct per-protocol analyses as sensitivity analyses. Analysis of the primary outcome (between-group difference in ascending aortic distensibility at 12 months) will be performed by ANCOVA adjusting for age, duration of ESKD and baseline values. Secondary analyses will similarly be by between-group ANCOVA, adjusting for age, duration of ESKD and baseline values of the variable of interest. All prespecified secondary outcomes will be reported in study publications. Subgroup analyses will be performed in older versus younger participants (age >65 vs <65 years) by analysing for heterogeneity of treatment effect. As a sensitivity analysis, we will perform multiple imputation for missing data for the primary outcome if the assumption of Missing at Random is met. The number and characteristics of serious adverse events (SAE) will be summarised as a whole and by study arm. Analyses will be conducted using R statistical software package (R V.3.5.3 or higher).

    Sample size

    Sample size has been determined to detect a 1.0×10–3 (SD 1.3×10–3) mm Hg-1 improvement in ascending aortic distensibility in the intervention group relative to placebo at 12 months: a difference that we have previously shown to be associated with clinical difference in survival to death or cardiovascular event at 2 years.21 To achieve a power of 90% with alpha=0.05 requires 37 patients per group (74 in total). We assume a dropout rate of 20% over 12 months of follow-up (a conservative estimate based on previous studies) and aim to recruit 90 participants in total.

    Follow-up and timetable

    The study timetable is illustrated in figure 1. Recruitment commenced in September 2017 and all 90 participants were recruited and randomised by end June 2018. The study will complete when the last participant completes the last follow-up visit (estimated by July 2019). Results are expected by December 2019.

    Registration

    ViKTORIES was prospectively registered with ISRCTN Registry on 26/09/2017 (ISRCTN22012044).

    Ethics

    The study is being conducted in accordance with the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki (1964) and its revisions. The trial was approved by the West of Scotland Research Ethics Committee 4 (Ref: 17/WS/0101 on 22/06/2017) and is sponsored by NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde Research and Development Department (Ref: GN16RE696 on 22/09/2017). The study follows standard operating procedures of the trial Sponsor (https://www.glasgowctu.org/sops.aspx; NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Scotland, UK as part of Glasgow Clinical Trials Unit). Trial progress is monitored by Sponsor representatives from pharmacy, research and development and by the Clinical Trials Manager (KB); routine audit was conducted by Sponsor in 2018. An annual report is issued to the Research Ethics Committee and to the funder (Kidney Research UK). The study follows CONSORT guidelines (http://www.consort-statement.org).

    Safety considerations

    Menadiol diphosphate has few undesirable effects but allergic reactions have been known to occur rarely. Haemolytic anaemia has occurred rarely and is more common in G6PD deficiency; we exclude patients with this disorder. Similarly, we exclude patients with allergies to any constituent components of the intervention, including gelatine (found in capsules), lactose and cellulose (used as packing materials with menadiol diphosphate and as placebo). Patients will have monitoring of renal transplant function and immunosuppression levels in addition to standard care. All adverse events are recorded from the time a participant consents to join the study until the last study visit. Participants in this trial are expected to have multiple comorbidities and high levels of illness. The following are therefore classed as expected within this cohort of patients: death or hospitalisation due to new cardiovascular event, new diagnosis or treatment of cancer, fall or fracture, infection, exacerbation of an existing medical condition, deteriorating renal function, high or low potassium levels, nausea, vomiting, constipation or diarrhoea; admission for elective or planned investigation or treatment. For the purposes of this study, only suspected unexpected serious adverse reactions are collected in an expedited manner and reported to the sponsor via the pharmacovigilance office (within 24 hours of the site becoming aware of the event). These events are determined if they are suspected to be caused by the intervention (ie, an unexpected SAE that occurred after the initiation of the intervention and without a clear alternative explanation) but the events are not in keeping with information known about menadiol diphosphate. Participants with unresolved adverse events at the last study visit will be followed up until resolution or 30 days (whichever is sooner).

    Dissemination plan

    Complete trial data will be submitted for presentation at an international meeting and will be published in a peer-reviewed journal, and shared on social media. After publication, ViKTORIES participants will be informed of trials results by letter and the dataset will be contributed to the Virtual International Renal and Transplant Trials Archive (www.virtualtrialsarchives.org/virtta).

    Acknowledgments

    We would like to thank the renal research nurses, clinical trials pharmacy and ViKTORIES participants.

    References

    1. ↵
      1. Gansevoort RT,
      2. Correa-Rotter R,
      3. Hemmelgarn BR, et al
      . Chronic kidney disease and cardiovascular risk: epidemiology, mechanisms, and prevention. Lancet 2013;382:339–52.doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60595-4pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23727170
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    2. ↵
      1. Jardine AG,
      2. Gaston RS,
      3. Fellstrom BC, et al
      . Prevention of cardiovascular disease in adult recipients of kidney transplants. Lancet 2011;378:1419–27.doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61334-2pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22000138
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    3. ↵
      1. Byrne C,
      2. Caskey F,
      3. Dawnay CC, et al
      . Uk renal registry UK renal registry 19th annual report of the renal association. Nephron 2017;137.
    4. ↵
      1. Townsend RR,
      2. Wimmer NJ,
      3. Chirinos JA, et al
      . Aortic PWV in chronic kidney disease: a CRIC ancillary study. Am J Hypertens 2010;23:282–9.doi:10.1038/ajh.2009.240pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20019670
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    5. ↵
      1. Matsushita K,
      2. Sang Y,
      3. Ballew SH, et al
      . Subclinical atherosclerosis measures for cardiovascular prediction in CKD. J Am Soc Nephrol 2015;26:439–47.doi:10.1681/ASN.2014020173pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25145930
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    6. ↵
      1. Benjamens S,
      2. Pol RA,
      3. Glaudemans AWJM, et al
      . A high abdominal aortic calcification score by dual X-ray absorptiometry is associated with cardiovascular events after kidney transplantation. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2018;33:2253–9.doi:10.1093/ndt/gfy158pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29897569
      OpenUrlPubMed
    7. ↵
      1. Townsend RR,
      2. Anderson AH,
      3. Chirinos JA, et al
      . Association of pulse wave velocity with chronic kidney disease progression and mortality. Hypertension 2018;71:1101–7.doi:10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.117.10648
      OpenUrl
    8. ↵
      Kidney disease: improving global outcomes (KDIGO) transplant Working Group. KDIGO clinical practice guideline for the care of kidney transplant recipients. Am J Transplant 2009;9:S1–155.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    9. ↵
      1. Kasiske BL,
      2. Chakkera HA,
      3. Roel J
      . Explained and unexplained ischemic heart disease risk after renal transplantation. J Am Soc Nephrol 2000;11:1735–43.pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10966499
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    10. ↵
      1. Israni AK,
      2. Snyder JJ,
      3. Skeans MA, et al
      . Predicting coronary heart disease after kidney transplantation: patient outcomes in renal transplantation (Port) study. Am J Transplant 2010;10:338–53.doi:10.1111/j.1600-6143.2009.02949.xpmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20415903
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    11. ↵
      1. Schurgers LJ,
      2. Uitto J,
      3. Reutelingsperger CP
      . Vitamin K-dependent carboxylation of matrix gla-protein: a crucial switch to control ectopic mineralization. Trends Mol Med 2013;19:217–26.doi:10.1016/j.molmed.2012.12.008pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23375872
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    12. ↵
      1. Viegas CSB,
      2. Simes DC
      . New perspectives for the nutritional value of vitamin K in human health. J Nutr Disorders Ther 2016;6.doi:10.4172/2161-0509.1000192
    13. ↵
      1. Boxma PY,
      2. van den Berg E,
      3. Geleijnse JM, et al
      . Vitamin K intake and plasma desphospho-uncarboxylated matrix gla-protein levels in kidney transplant recipients. PLoS One 2012;7:e47991. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0047991pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23118917
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    14. ↵
      1. Keyzer CA,
      2. Vermeer C,
      3. Joosten MM, et al
      . Vitamin K status and mortality after kidney transplantation: a cohort study. Am J Kidney Dis 2015;65:474–83.doi:10.1053/j.ajkd.2014.09.014pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25453995
      OpenUrlPubMed
    15. ↵
      1. Braam L,
      2. McKeown N,
      3. Jacques P, et al
      . Dietary phylloquinone intake as a potential marker for a heart-healthy dietary pattern in the Framingham offspring cohort. J Am Diet Assoc 2004;104:1410–4.doi:10.1016/j.jada.2004.06.021pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15354158
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    16. ↵
      1. Lees JS,
      2. Chapman FA,
      3. Witham MD, et al
      . Vitamin K status, supplementation and vascular disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Heart 2019;105:935–45.doi:10.1136/heartjnl-2018-313955pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30514729
      OpenUrlPubMed
    17. ↵
      1. Levey AS,
      2. Stevens LA,
      3. Schmid CH, et al
      . A new equation to estimate glomerular filtration rate. Ann Intern Med 2009;150:604–12.doi:10.7326/0003-4819-150-9-200905050-00006pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19414839
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    18. ↵
      1. Dill T
      . Contraindications to magnetic resonance imaging: non-invasive imaging. Heart 2008;94:943–8.doi:10.1136/hrt.2007.125039pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18552230
      OpenUrlFREE Full Text
    19. ↵
      1. Graham-Brown MPM,
      2. Adenwalla SF,
      3. Lai FY, et al
      . The reproducibility of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging measures of aortic stiffness and their relationship to cardiac structure in prevalent haemodialysis patients. Clin Kidney J 2018;11:864–73.doi:10.1093/ckj/sfy042pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30524722
      OpenUrlPubMed
    20. ↵
      1. Laurent S,
      2. Cockcroft J,
      3. Van Bortel L, et al
      . Expert consensus document on arterial stiffness: methodological issues and clinical applications. Eur Heart J 2006;27:2588–605.doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehl254pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17000623
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    21. ↵
      1. Mark PB,
      2. Doyle A,
      3. Blyth KG, et al
      . Vascular function assessed with cardiovascular magnetic resonance predicts survival in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2008;10:39.doi:10.1186/1532-429X-10-39pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18706114
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    22. ↵
      1. Zimmerli LU,
      2. Mark PB,
      3. Steedman T, et al
      . Vascular function in patients with end-stage renal disease and/or coronary artery disease: a cardiac magnetic resonance imaging study. Kidney Int 2007;71:68–73.doi:10.1038/sj.ki.5002024pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17136027
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    23. ↵
      1. Janssen MF,
      2. Pickard AS,
      3. Golicki D, et al
      . Measurement properties of the EQ-5D-5L compared to the EQ-5D-3L across eight patient groups: a multi-country study. Qual Life Res 2013;22:1717–27.doi:10.1007/s11136-012-0322-4pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23184421
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    24. ↵
      1. Voges I,
      2. Jerosch-Herold M,
      3. Hedderich J, et al
      . Normal values of aortic dimensions, distensibility, and pulse wave velocity in children and young adults: a cross-sectional study. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2012;14:77.doi:10.1186/1532-429X-14-77pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23151055
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    25. ↵
      1. Adenwalla SF,
      2. Graham-Brown MPM,
      3. Leone FMT, et al
      . The importance of accurate measurement of aortic stiffness in patients with chronic kidney disease and end-stage renal disease. Clin Kidney J 2017;10:503–15.doi:10.1093/ckj/sfx028pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28852490
      OpenUrlPubMed
    26. ↵
      1. Rauhalammi SMO,
      2. Mangion K,
      3. Barrientos PH, et al
      . Native myocardial longitudinal (T1) relaxation time: Regional, age, and sex associations in the healthy adult heart. J Magn Reson Imaging 2016;44:541–8.doi:10.1002/jmri.25217pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26946323
      OpenUrlPubMed
    27. ↵
      1. Cerqueira MD,
      2. Weissman NJ,
      3. Dilsizian V, et al
      . Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart. A statement for healthcare professionals from the cardiac imaging Committee of the Council on clinical cardiology of the American heart association. Circulation 2002;105:539–42.doi:10.1161/hc0402.102975pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11815441
      OpenUrlFREE Full Text
    28. ↵
      1. Agatston AS,
      2. Janowitz WR,
      3. Hildner FJ, et al
      . Quantification of coronary artery calcium using ultrafast computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 1990;15:827–32.doi:10.1016/0735-1097(90)90282-Tpmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2407762
      OpenUrlFREE Full Text

    Footnotes

    • Twitter @jennifer_s_lees, @kenneth_mangion

    • Contributors JSL, ER, AGJ, MDW and PBM designed the trial. JSL, KB and PBM organised trial approvals and set up. JSL, RW, TH, ER, GR, KM and PBM developed imaging protocols. All authors contributed to and approve this manuscript.

    • Funding ViKTORIES is an investigator-led clinical trial that is funded by Kidney Research UK (TF_013_20161225) and Darlinda’s Charity for Renal Research. JSL is personally funded by a Kidney Research UK Training Fellowship (TF_013_20161225) and supported by a British Heart Foundation Centre of Excellence Award (RE/13/5/30177).

    • Competing interests MDW and PBM are investigators on trials of vitamin K supplementation in patients with chronic kidney disease and patients with falls (funded from British Heart Foundation and Chief Scientist Office, Scottish Government).

    • Patient consent for publication Not required.

    • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

    • Data availability statement Data are available upon reasonable request. Data will be available through the Virtual International Renal and Transplant Trials Archive (http://www.virtualtrialsarchives.org/virtta/)