Article info
PDFEditorial
Commentary on the Nordic-Baltic bifurcation study IV (randomised comparison of provisional side branch stenting versus a two-stent strategy for treatment of true coronary bifurcation lesions involving a large side branch)
- Correspondence to Dr Mirvat Alasnag, Cardiology, King Fahd Armed Forces Hospital, Jeddah 23311, Saudi Arabia; mirvat{at}jeddacath.com
Citation
Commentary on the Nordic-Baltic bifurcation study IV (randomised comparison of provisional side branch stenting versus a two-stent strategy for treatment of true coronary bifurcation lesions involving a large side branch)
Publication history
- Accepted November 11, 2019
- First published November 21, 2019.
Online issue publication
April 30, 2020
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.