Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Original research article
Inception of the ‘endocarditis team’ is associated with improved survival in patients with infective endocarditis who are managed medically: findings from a before-and-after study
  1. Amit Kaura1,2,
  2. Jonathan Byrne1,
  3. Amanda Fife3,
  4. Ranjit Deshpande1,
  5. Max Baghai1,
  6. Margaret Gunning1,
  7. Donald Whitaker1,
  8. Mark Monaghan1,
  9. Philip A MacCarthy1,
  10. Olaf Wendler1 and
  11. Rafal Dworakowski1
  1. 1 Department of Cardiology and Cardiac Surgery, King’s College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, King’s College Hospital, London, UK
  2. 2 Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK
  3. 3 Department of Microbiology, King’s College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, King’s College Hospital, London, UK
  1. Correspondence to Dr Rafal Dworakowski; rdworakowski{at}gmail.com

Abstract

Objective Despite improvements in its management, infective endocarditis (IE) is associated with poor survival. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of a multidisciplinary endocarditis team (ET), including a cardiologist, microbiologist and a cardiac surgeon, on the outcome of patients with acute IE according to medical or surgical treatment strategies.

Methods We conducted an observational before-and-after study of 196 consecutive patients with definite IE, who were treated at a tertiary reference centre between 2009 and 2015. The study was divided into two periods: period 1, before the formation of the ET (n=101), and period 2, after the formation of the ET (n=95). The role of the ET included regular multidisciplinary team meetings to confirm diagnosis, inform the type and duration of antibiotic therapy and recommend early surgery, when indicated, according to European guidelines.

Results The patient demographics and predisposing conditions for IE were comparable between the two study periods. In the time period following the introduction of the ET, there was a reduction in both the time to commencement of IE-specific antibiotic therapy (4.0±4.0 days vs 2.5±3.2 days; P=0.004) and the time from suspected IE to surgery (7.8±7.3 days vs 5.3±4.2 days; P=0.004). A 12-month Kaplan-Meier survival for patients managed medically was 42.9% in the pre-ET period and 66.7% in the post-ET period (P=0.03). The involvement of the ET was a significant independent predictor of 1-year survival in patients managed medically (HR 0.24, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.87; P=0.03).

Conclusions A standardised multidisciplinary team approach may lead to earlier diagnosis of IE, more appropriate individualised management strategies, expedited surgery, where indicated, and improved survival in those patients chosen for medical management, supporting the recent change in guidelines to recommend the use of a multidisciplinary team in the care of patients with IE.

  • endocarditis
  • quality of care and outcomes
  • surgery-valve

This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • Contributors Study conception and design: RD, JB, AK. Acquisition of data: AK, RD, JB, AF, MG. Analysis and interpretation of data: AK, RD, JB,OW, MM, PAMacC. Drafting of manuscript: AK, RD, JB, OW, MM, PAMacC, AF, RD, MB, MG, DW. Critical revision: AK, RD.

  • Funding This work was supported in part by a National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre award to Guy’s & St Thomas’ Hospital and King’s College London in partnership with King’s College Hospital.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent Detail has been removed from this case description/these case descriptions to ensure anonymity. The editors and reviewers have seen the detailed information available and are satisfied that the information backs up the case the authors are making.

  • Ethics approval King’s College Hospital, Cardiovascular Division Review Board.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

  • Data sharing statement All data are provided in full in the Results section of this paper. Additional data supporting this study are provided as supplementary information accompanying this paper.