Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Original research article
Patients expectations and fulfilment of expectations before and after treatment for suspected coronary artery disease assessed with a newly developed questionnaire in combination with established health-related quality of life questionnaires
  1. Annika Odell1,
  2. Angela Bång2,
  3. Paulin Andréll3,
  4. Charlotte Widell1,
  5. Henrik Fryklund4,
  6. Anders Kallryd5,
  7. Hans Tygesen6 and
  8. Lars Grip1
  1. 1 Department of Cardiology, The Medicine Institute of Sahlgrenska Academy, Gothenburg, Sweden
  2. 2 Faculty of Caring Science, University of Borås, Borås, Sweden
  3. 3 Multidisciplinary Pain Center, Sahlgrenska University Hospital and Institute of Medicine, Gothenburg, Sweden
  4. 4 Department of Medicine, Norra lvsborg County Hospital, Trollhttan, Sweden
  5. 5 Department of Medicine, Skaraborg Hospital, Skövde, Sweden
  6. 6 Department of Medicine, Sothern Älvsborg Hospital, Borås, Sweden
  1. Correspondence to Dr Annika Odell; annika.odell{at}vgregion.se; aodell{at}live.se

Abstract

Background Clinical decision-making is often based on evidence of outcome after a specific treatment. Healthcare providers and patients may, however, have different perceptions and expectations of what to achieve from a certain healthcare measure.

Aims To evaluate patients’ expectations, perceptions and health related quality of life (HRQoL) before a care process including coronary angiography for suspected coronary artery disease and to evaluate the fulfilment of these expectations in relation to established patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) 6 months later. Furthermore, an aim was to try to define meaningful patient reported experience measures (PREMs) in this population.

Methods 544 patients planned for coronary angiography completed a newly developed questionnaire to assess expectations and perceptions of treatment, the expectation questionnaire (ExpQ) and two established HRQoL questionnaires together with the established generic Short-Form 36 (SF36) and the disease specific Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ).

Results Patients had before the intervention, in general, high expectations of improvement after investigation and treatment and there was a positive attitude towards life style changes, medication and participation in decision-making regarding their own treatment. Only, 56.4% of the patients, however, reported fulfilment of treatment expectations. Fulfilment of treatment expectations correlated strongly with improvement in HRQoL after the care process.

Conclusions To measure patients ́ expectations and fulfilments of these may offer simple and meaningful outcomes to evaluate a healthcare process from a patient ́s perspective. To approach patients’ expectations may also strengthen patient involvement in the care process with the possibilities of both higher patient satisfaction and medical results of the treatment.

  • Coronary artery disease
  • Stable angina < myocardialIschaemia and infarction (ihd)
  • quality of care andOutcomes

This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • Contributors All the participated authors have contributed and approved of the manuscript.

  • Competing interests None Declared.

  • Ethics approval Regional Ethical Review Board at Gothenburg University (DNR: 667-10)

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.