Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Original research article
Prehospital and in-hospital use of healthcare resources in patients surviving acute coronary syndromes: an analysis of the EPICOR registry
  1. Lieven Annemans1,
  2. Nicolas Danchin2,
  3. Frans Van de Werf3,
  4. Stuart Pocock4,
  5. Muriel Licour5,
  6. Jesús Medina6 and
  7. Héctor Bueno7,8,9
  1. 1Department of Public Health, I-CHER Interuniversity Centre for Health Economics Research, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
  2. 2Département de Cardiologie, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou & Université René Descartes, Paris, France
  3. 3Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
  4. 4London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
  5. 5Medical Department, AstraZeneca France, Rueil Malmaison Cedex, France
  6. 6Observational Research Centre, Payer & Real World Evidence, AstraZeneca, Madrid, Spain
  7. 7Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Cardiovasculares (CNIC)
  8. 8Cardiology Department, Instituto de Investigación i+12, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre
  9. 9Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
  1. Correspondence to Professor Lieven Annemans; Lieven.Annemans{at}Ugent.be

Abstract

Objective The aim of this report is to provide insight into real-world healthcare resource use (HCRU) during the critical management of patients surviving acute coronary syndromes (ACS), using data from EPICOR (long-tErm follow-up of antithrombotic management Patterns In acute CORonary syndrome patients) (NCT01171404).

Methods EPICOR was a prospective, multinational, observational study that enrolled 10 568 ACS survivors from 555 hospitals in 20 countries in Europe and Latin America, between September 2010 and March 2011. HCRU was evaluated in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) or non-ST-segment elevation ACS (NSTE-ACS), with or without a history of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Multivariable analysis was performed to determine factors that affected resource use.

Results Before hospitalisation, more patients with STEMI than with NSTE-ACS had their first ECG (44.1% vs 36.4%, p<0.0001) and received antithrombotic medication (26.6% vs 15.2%, p<0.0001). Patients with NSTE-ACS with prior CVD were less likely than those without to be catheterised (73.1% vs 82.8%, p<0.0001). More patients with STEMI than with NSTE-ACS had percutaneous coronary intervention (77.1% vs 54.9%, p<0.0001), but fewer underwent coronary artery bypass grafting (1.2% vs 3.7%, p<0.0001). Multivariable analysis showed that resource use, including length of hospital stay and coronary revascularisation, was significantly influenced by multiple factors, including ACS type, site characteristics and region (all p≤0.05).

Conclusions In this large-scale, real-life study, findings were generally in line with clinical logic, although site characteristics and region still significantly affected resource use. Moreover, and unexpectedly, resource use tended to be slightly higher in patients without a history of CVD.

Trial registration number NCT01171404 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.