Extra virgin olive oil (EVOO) versus omega-6 vegetable oil

When added on top of a monounsaturated fatty acid (MUFA)-rich diet, olive oil has been found to have a greater antihypertensive effect in patients with normocholesterolaemia and hypercholesterolaemia (−10/10 mm Hg and −7/6 mm Hg) even when compared with high-oleic sunflower oil (−6/5 mm Hg and −2/0.5 mm Hg, respectively).7 One randomised study in 23 patients with hypertension (baseline blood pressure was 134/90 mm Hg) placed patients on a MUFA diet (17.2% MUFA, 3.8% polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA)) or an omega-6 PUFA diet (10.5% MUFA, 10.5% PUFA) for 6 months.8 Study participants were recommended to consume 40 g of EVOO or sunflower oil (30 g was recommended per day in women) with the oils being added to the diet after the cooking of foods. Patients were then crossed over to the other diet. At the end of the MUFA diet, resting blood pressure was significantly lower (127/84 mm Hg) compared with the omega-6 PUFA diet (135/90 mm Hg, p=0.05 systolic, p=0.01 diastolic). The antihypertensive medication dosage was also significantly reduced by 48% with the MUFA diet but non-significantly (4% reduction) with the omega-6 PUFA diet (p<0.005 for the difference). Moreover, eight patients on the MUFA diet no longer needed any antihypertensive therapy by the end of the study, whereas, all patients receiving the omega-6 PUFA diet required antihypertensive treatment despite two patients at baseline who initially did not need antihypertensive medications prior to the omega-6 PUFA diet. It was concluded that the use of EVOO, ‘…markedly lowers daily antihypertensive dosage requirement, possibly through enhanced nitric oxide levels stimulated by polyphenols’.8

Omega-3 fish oil versus omega-6 vegetable oil

In a 10-week randomised study, 6 g of fish oil per day (5100 mg of eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA)/docosahexaenoic acid (DHA)) significantly lowered blood pressure (−4.6/−3.0 mm Hg) in those with previously untreated mild hypertension.9 This benefit was not found with 6 g of corn oil. Indeed, the blood pressure difference between the fish oil and corn oil groups, after adjusting for other covariates, was −6.4/−2.8 mm Hg in favour of the fish oil.9 There was also a borderline significant increase in standing arterial pressure after 10 weeks of supplementation with corn oil compared with baseline (+2.00 mm Hg, p=0.055). Moreover, compared with baseline, the standing blood pressure increased from 143.6/97.8 mm Hg to 144.9/98.9 mm Hg and sitting blood pressure went from 142.8/94.6 to 144/94.4 mm Hg with corn oil supplementation.9 A diet high in omega-6 can increase the production of vasoconstricting eicosanoids which may promote increases in blood pressure.10 Thus, more data is needed to understand the effects of omega-6 rich vegetable oils such as corn oil on blood pressure. Box 1 summarises the potential mechanisms implicating linoleic acid from omega-6 vegetable oils and hypertension.

The benefits of marine omega-3s on blood pressure

Fish oil supplementation has been found to reduce blood pressure and normalise the hypercoagulable state in patients who are obese, hypertensive and dyslipidaemic.11 Fish oil leads to a similar reduction in blood pressure in both patients without diabetics (−12.7 mm Hg/−7.9 mm Hg; baseline blood pressure 158.7/80.8 mm Hg down to 146/72.9 mm Hg, p<0.001) and patients with diabetic hypertension (–15.7/−7.6 mm Hg; baseline blood pressure 157.6/83.2 mm Hg going down to 141.9/75.6 mm Hg, p<0.001). Thus, fish oil can reduce blood pressure by 12/7 mm Hg or more, making marine omega-3 supplementation an extremely potent antihypertensive especially in certain patient populations. Moreover, fish oil reduces platelet aggregation in non-diabetics (4.2% vs 12.1%, p<0.001). Patients with diabetes may need larger dose of omega-3s compared with patients without diabetics in order to improve their hypercoagulable state.12 The same may apply to patients with metabolic syndrome.13

In one double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, fish oil (containing 2 g of omega-3s) significantly improved endothelial function in normoglycemic offspring of type 2 diabetics.14 Fish oil also reduced markers of inflammation (tumour necrosis factor-alpha, interleukin-6, high sensitivity-C-reactive protein, vascular cell adhesion molecule, intercellular adhesion molecule and E-selectin) and tended to improve adiponectin levels. Since the offspring of type 2 diabetics generally have endothelial dysfunction and chronic inflammation, this patient population may particularly benefit from supplementing with the EPA and DHA. Considering that endothelial dysfunction is thought to be one of the initial steps in the formation of atherosclerotic plaque, marine omega-3s may also be useful for reducing the risk of cardiovascular events. In summary, the endothelium becomes healthier when the offspring of patients with type 2 diabetes supplement with fish oil. This may be due to a reduction in inflammation.

Another randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial in 59 overweight, mildly hyperlipidaemic men found that 4 g of DHA per day, as compared with EPA, for 6 weeks improved forearm blood flow in response to acetylcholine infusion and coinfusion of acetylcholine with N:(G)-monomethyl-L-arginine versus placebo (olive oil). DHA also enhanced the dilatory responses to sodium nitroprusside and reduced the constrictor response to norepinephrine. The authors concluded, ‘relative to placebo, DHA, but not EPA, enhances vasodilator mechanisms and attenuates constrictor responses in the forearm microcirculation. Improvements in endothelium-independent mechanisms appear to be predominant and may contribute to the selective blood pressure-lowering effect observed with DHA compared with EPA in humans’.15 Indeed, in another study, DHA but not EPA was able to reduce postprandial arterial stiffness after a high-fat test meal.16 Thus, DHA may have better antihypertensive and antiatherosclerosis effects compared with EPA.

A 24-week randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial in 60 patients with systemic lupus erythematosus showed that 3 g of omega-3 PUFAs significantly improved disease activity, brachial artery endothelial function, and oxidative stress. The authors concluded, ‘Low-dose dietary supplementation with omega-3 fish oils in systemic lupus erythematosus not only has a therapeutic effect on disease activity but also improves endothelial function and reduces oxidative stress and may therefore confer cardiovascular benefits’.17 Similar findings of improved large artery endothelial function were found with omega-3 PUFAs (4 g/day) in patients with hypercholesterolaemia.18

A meta-analysis of 31 placebo-controlled studies found a dose-dependent reduction in blood pressure with fish oil intake (−1.3/−0.7 mm Hg at doses <3 g/day; −2.9/−1.6 mm Hg at 3.3 to 7 g/day and −8.1/−5.8 mm Hg at 15 g/day) with an average reduction of −3.0/−1.5 mm Hg.19 However, at least 3.3 g/day of omega-3s was needed to provide a significant reduction in blood pressure and this benefit seems to be strongest in patients with hypertension (−3.4/2.0 mm Hg, mean dose of 5.6 g/day), hyperlipidaemia (−4.4/−1.1 mm Hg, mean dose of 4 g/day) and especially atherosclerosis (−6.3/−2.9 mm Hg). A second meta-analysis of 36 randomised trials confirmed that fish oil (median dose 3.7 g/day) significantly reduces blood pressure by −2.1/−1.6 mm Hg.20 And another meta-analysis of 30 randomised trials showed that EPA+DHA (median dose of 3.5 g/day) reduces heart rate by 1.6 beats per minute versus placebo (p=0.002) and by 2.5 beats per minute in trials with a duration of >12 weeks or in those with a baseline heart rate >69 beats per minute.21 Another meta-analysis of 16 randomised controlled trials found that omega-3 PUFAs (ranging from 0.45 to 4.5 g/day) over a median of 56 days significantly increases flow-mediated dilation indicating an improvement in endothelial function.22 These results were confirmed in overweight patients with dyslipidaemia and type 2 diabetes.23 Another meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials found that omega-3 PUFA (at doses above 3 g/day) significantly lowers blood pressure. Indeed, in normotensives, the average blood pressure reduction was −1/−0.5 mm Hg and in untreated hypertensives, the reduction in blood pressure was much greater at −5.5/−3.5 mm Hg.24 DHA, as compared with EPA, may have a greater ability to reduce blood pressure and heart rate through improvements in vascular function.25

Alpha-linolenic acid

Alpha-linolenic acid (ALA) is naturally found in foods such as linseed (flaxseed), legumes, nuts (walnuts and chestnuts), spinach and citrus fruits. While there is very limited data with ALA and blood pressure, one observational study showed that for each 1% increase in ALA content in adipose tissue there was a decrease of 5 mm Hg in the systolic, diastolic and composite mean arterial blood pressure.26 The authors concluded, ‘…it is the linolenic (ALA) rather than the linoleic acid (LA) content of the diet that is negatively related to blood pressure’.26