Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Endogenous endothelin maintains coronary artery tone by endothelin type A receptor stimulation in patients undergoing coronary arteriography

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To examine the contribution of endothelin type A (ETA) receptor stimulation by endogenously generated endothelin-1 (ET-1) to the maintenance of coronary vascular tone in humans.

DESIGN Controlled clinical study.

SETTING Tertiary cardiovascular referral centre.

PATIENTS 14 subjects were studied, seven with normal coronary arteries and seven with coronary artery disease, mean (SEM) age, 53 (2) years.

INTERVENTIONS After diagnostic coronary arteriography, BQ-123 (a selective ETA receptor antagonist; 100 nmol/min) in 0.9% saline, was infused into the left coronary artery at a rate of 1 ml/min for 60 minutes. Eight control subjects received saline alone.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Blood flow velocity in the left anterior descending coronary artery, measured using a Doppler flow guidewire; coronary arteriography performed at baseline and immediately at the end of the BQ-123 or saline infusion to measure the diameter of proximal and distal left anterior descending coronary artery segments.

RESULTS The diameter of the proximal segment increased by 6 (2)%, while that of the distal segment increased by 12 (3)% after BQ-123 (both p < 0.05v baseline). Coronary blood flow increased from 75 (10) to 92 (10) ml/min and coronary vascular resistance decreased from 1.99 (0.36) to 1.44 (0.22) mm Hg/ml/min after BQ-123 (both p < 0.05 v baseline). The response to BQ-123 of patients with and without coronary artery disease was similar. There was no effect of saline in the controls.

CONCLUSIONS Endogenously produced ET-1 contributes to the maintenance of basal coronary artery tone in humans by ETA receptor stimulation. The role of ETB receptors remains to be defined.

  • endothelins
  • arteries
  • blood flow
  • coronary circulation
  • angiography

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

The endothelins are a family of 21 amino acid peptides with potent and characteristically sustained vasoconstrictor and vasopressor actions.1 Endothelin-1 (ET-1) is the predominant isopeptide generated by the vascular endothelium.2 ET-1 binds to at least two receptors. The ETA receptor appears to be the major one, causing vasoconstriction in arteries, while the ETB receptor mediates the release of endothelium dependent vasodilator substances and is also present in some resistance and capacitance arteries, where it can contribute to vasoconstriction.3 ET-1 may play a role in the pathophysiology of several conditions associated with vasoconstriction, including chronic heart failure, hypertension, Raynaud's disease, and renal failure.3 ,4 Recently described inhibitors of endothelin converting enzyme and endothelin receptor antagonists may therefore have therapeutic potential as vasodilator drugs in these conditions. Endogenous production of ET-1 contributes importantly to the maintenance of basal peripheral vascular tone5 and blood pressure6 in healthy volunteers, mainly through an effect on ETA receptors. In contrast, the main effect of endogenous ET-1 on ETB receptors in resistance arteries appears to be vasodilatation.7 ,8

ET-1 constricts human epicardial coronary arteries in vitro.9 ET-1 and big ET-1 administration in rat heart reduces coronary blood flow, and BQ-123, an ETA receptor antagonist, abolishes this effect of ET-1.10 BQ-123 has also been shown to reduce infarct size in a canine model of coronary occlusion and reperfusion.11 Cannan and colleagues showed that low concentrations of exogenous ET-1 in dogs, which may mimic pathophysiological concentrations, result in coronary vasoconstriction mediated predominantly by the ETA receptor, such vasoconstriction being significantly attenuated by selective ETA receptor antagonism.12 Pernow and colleagues showed in humans that exogenous ET-1 provokes a decrease in coronary sinus blood flow and an increase in coronary vascular resistance after intravenous administration.13 However, the contribution of endogenously generated ET-1 to the epicardial coronary vessel tone and artery resistance in humans is not currently known.

In the present study, therefore, we examined the contribution of ETA receptor stimulation by endogenously generated ET-1 to the maintenance of basal coronary vascular tone and blood flow in patients undergoing coronary arteriography. Plasma big ET-1 was also measured in order to determine whether this might predict the response to BQ-123.

Methods

We studied 22 individuals, mean (SEM) age 55 (1) years, undergoing routine diagnostic cardiac catheterisation for suspected coronary artery disease (table 1). Eight made up the control group and 14 the study group. Seven of these (mean age 57 (5) years) had coronary artery disease (luminal artery stenoses > 70% in the right coronary or the left circumflex artery; the left anterior descending coronary artery was atherosclerotic but without severe lesions). Seven individuals (mean age 49 (3) years) had normal coronary arteries without any angiographic sign of atherosclerosis (although apparently normal subjects presenting to the cardiac catheterisation laboratory may often have subclinical pathology). None of the study participants had a history of hypertension or familial hyperlipidaemia.

Table 1

Clinical characteristics of patients studied

All the coronary artery disease patients were in class 1–2 according to the Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) classification. All the women were postmenopausal except for two in the study group, one with normal coronary arteries and one with coronary artery disease.

The primary objective of the study was to examine the intracoronary effects of BQ-123 in patients undergoing coronary arteriography, and a secondary objective was to examine differences between those with and without coronary artery disease.

Approval by the ethics committee was obtained and the patients gave written informed consent. The investigation conformed with the principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki.

EXCLUSION CRITERIA

Patients with unstable angina, left main stem disease, cardiomyopathy, decreased left ventricular systolic function or segmental wall motion abnormalities, valvular heart disease, pulmonary emphysema, claudication, systolic blood pressure < 100 mm Hg, or any concurrent acute illness were excluded from the study.

DRUGS

All drugs except aspirin were discontinued seven days before the study. Intra-arterial heparin (5000 IU) was given immediately after coronary arteriography. No other drugs apart from ETAreceptor antagonists were given during the study.

STUDY PROTOCOL

All patients underwent routine diagnostic cardiac catheterisation at the time of the study, by the Seldinger technique. They were fasted and no premedication was used. After the procedure, a 7 French diagnostic coronary catheter was inserted into the ostium of the left coronary artery through an 8 French femoral sheath. A Doppler flow guidewire was inserted in the left anterior descending artery, beyond its origin and not near the origin of a side branch. The Doppler signal had to be stable before the study could proceed.

To avoid any transient haemodynamic influence of the contrast agent,14 ,15 the study protocol was started 10 minutes after the end of coronary arteriography. Non-ionic contrast agents were used.

BQ-123 (cyclo{-D-Asp-L-Pro-D=Val-L-Leu-D-Trp-}; American Peptide Company, Sunnyvale, California, USA) was prepared in aliquots (in 0.9% saline) after sterilised micropore filtration (0.22 μm) for the removal of any bacterial or viral particles and then maintained at −80°C for later use. A subset of aliquots tested negative for pyrogens before clinical use.

STUDY GROUP

Intracoronary BQ-123 (100 nmol/min) was infused at a constant rate of 1 ml/min for 60 minutes, using an infusion pump. This dose was the same as that previously given in the forearm.5Although the blood flow in the left coronary artery is a little greater than in the forearm, the dose of BQ-123 used in the forearm was 10 times higher than the minimum required for maximal effects.16 ,17 The coronary concentrations of BQ-123 were estimated to be ∼1 nmol/ml, within the range of those having a selective action on the ETA receptor both in vitro18 and in the human forearm circulation.7 Thus we anticipated effective blockade of the ETA receptor with this dose. The duration of the BQ-123 administration was chosen because in the forearm studies5the maximum effect of the drug occurred after one hour of continuous infusion. The half life of BQ-123, which is a peptide, is probably brief in plasma, of the order of minutes (or at most hours). However, there is probably tight binding of BQ-123 to the ETAreceptor, and this antagonist–receptor complex may undergo internalisation within the vascular smooth muscle cell. Hence any measure of plasma half life probably underestimates the duration of the effect.6 More important from the point of view of these studies is the speed of onset of the biological effect of BQ-123 on smooth muscle tone. This is slow and in the forearm circulation takes up to 60 minutes to reach a steady state.5 ,7 In practice the current experiments were limited by the time over which measurements could be made. For this reason, and because the effects of BQ-123 are also slow to reverse,5 it would not be possible to do a study of this sort with a crossover design.

Arterial blood pressure was monitored from the femoral sheath. Baseline haemodynamic measurements (heart rate and blood pressure) and coronary arteriography by hand injection were performed before the initiation of BQ-123 infusion and after 10 minutes of normal saline infusion (1 ml/min) while the flow guidewire was in place but disconnected from the flow map (fig 1). The Doppler flow guidewire was then connected to the flow map and, after 10 minutes of normal saline infusion, the baseline recordings of the blood flow velocity were obtained (fig 1). The coronary blood flow velocity trend was recorded on videotape (fig 2).

Figure 1

A flow chart with the time course of the measurements. Ten minutes after the end of coronary angiography the Doppler flow guidewire was inserted into the left anterior descending coronary artery. After 10 minutes of saline infusion, coronary artery injections were performed and after another 10 minutes of saline infusion the baseline Doppler flow velocity measurements were recorded. BQ-123 or saline infusion was then begun and continued for 60 minutes while flow velocity was stored on a videotape. Before the end of the infusion, flow velocity measurements were recorded and coronary artery injection was performed immediately afterwards.

Figure 2

Coronary blood flow velocity in a patient with coronary artery disease 15 minutes (top) and 30 minutes (middle) after the initiation of BQ-123 infusion and after the end of the infusion (bottom). It can be seen that peak velocity integral (PVi) increases from 14 to 17 and 22 cm, respectively, while systolic blood pressure decreases from 162 to 154 and 151 mm Hg. Note that the blood flow velocity scale is different in the three recordings.

New recordings of the coronary blood flow velocity were obtained at the end of BQ-123 infusion. Because the injection of contrast material into the coronary circulation results in a typical biphasic response of coronary blood flow velocity, with an initial decrease followed by an increase in velocity caused by the hyperaemic effects of the contrast material, the velocity measured immediately before the contrast injection was used for estimation of coronary blood flow (fig 1). Coronary arteriographic injection was performed at baseline and immediately at the end of the infusion, after the velocity recordings.

CONTROL GROUP

Normal saline infusion instead of BQ-123 was given. The remainder of the procedure was the same as in the study group (fig 1).

QUANTITATIVE CORONARY ARTERIOGRAPHY

Coronary luminal diameter was measured by quantitative computerised analysis with an automated edge contour detection analysis system (Computerized Angiographic Analysis System, version 2V2; Pie Data Medical, Maastricht, The Netherlands)19 from end diastolic frames of each arteriogram. The stem of the coronary catheter was used for calibration to determine absolute measurement in millimetres, and correction was made for radiographic pincushion distortion.

VALIDATION OF THE QUANTITATIVE CORONARY ARTERIOGRAPHY

All the measured diameters were within 0.07 mm of the mean value of those obtained from computerised measurement by two independent operators. Twenty four arterial segments were analysed by two independent observers and reanalysed at a later time. The mean intraobserver variation, expressed as the standard error of the estimate, was 0.10 mm. The interobserver variation was 0.12 mm.

All major coronary arteries were divided into thirds using the American Heart Association classification20 and only angiographically good images were included in the study. Proximal and distal arterial segment changes (from baseline to the end of BQ-123 infusion) were studied. The proximal segment of the left anterior descending coronary artery was estimated over a short arterial segment immediately distal to the Doppler probe (approximately 5 mm from the Doppler guidewire).

The analysis of the angiograms was performed by two cardiologists who were unaware of the patients' clinical characteristics.

DOPPLER FLOW GUIDEWIRE

The flow velocity measurements were obtained using a Doppler flow guidewire (FloWire, Cardiometrics, Mountain View, California, USA) which has been validated in vitro and in an animal model using simultaneous electromagnetic flow measurements for comparison.21

Coronary blood flow was calculated from the coronary blood flow velocity and the coronary artery diameter,22 using the formula: coronary blood flow (CBF, ml/min) = (πD2)/4 × PVi × HR

where D is the diastolic diameter of the epicardial coronary artery in cm, measured 5 mm beyond the tip of the Doppler guidewire, PVi is the peak velocity integral of the coronary blood flow velocity in cm, and HR is the heart rate in beats/min.

The Doppler flow wire is a 0.014 inch (0.36 mm), 175 cm long flexible and steerable guidewire having a floppy, shapable distal end with a 12 MHz piezoelectric transducer mounted at the tip. The sample volume is positioned at a distance of 5.2 mm from the transducer and has an approximate width of 2.25 mm owing to the divergent ultrasound beam, so a large part of the flow velocity profile is also included in the sample volume for eccentric positions of the Doppler flow wire. After real time processing of the quadrature audio signal, a fast Fourier transform algorithm is used to increase the reliability of the analysis. The Doppler system calculates and displays several spectral variables on-line, including the averaged (mean of two beats) peak velocity, the peak velocity integral, and the maximum peak velocity, as shown in fig 2. The peak velocity integral is the integral of the peak velocity of the whole cycle (diastole and systole).

Coronary vascular resistance was calculated from the mean arterial pressure (MAP, mm Hg), and coronary blood flow using the formula22: coronary vascular resistance (CVR, mm Hg/ml/min) = MAP/CBF

PLASMA BIG ET-1

Blood samples were drawn from the femoral vein at baseline and at the end of BQ-123 infusion for big ET-1 estimation. Plasma big ET-1, as a measure of ET-1 generation,23 was measured without need for extraction by an enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (Biomedica Gesellschaft, Vienna, Austria). Cross reactivity with big ET(1–38) is 100%, and with big ET(22–38), ET-1, ET-2, and ET-3, < 1%. Intra-assay variation was 4.9% and interassay variation, 6.9%. Recovery from plasma spiked with big ET-1 was 96%. The detection limit of the assay is 0.05 fmol/ml and the normal range is < 0.7 fmol/ml.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

The values were analysed using the statistics program, version 5, of StatSoft Inc. All data are expressed as mean (SEM). In the study group, we used a 2 × 2 analysis of variance with one repeated measure, followed by post hoc comparison (Tukey's test) for the statistical analysis. In the control group we used analysis of variance with one repeated measure. Linear regression analysis using the least square difference and the analysis of variance was used in order to examine possible correlations between changes in coronary blood flow and resistance and baseline blood pressure and its changes, big ET-1, and smoking history. A probability value of p < 0.05 was considered significant.

Results

No adverse effects from the study protocol were recorded.

CONTROL GROUP

The effects of normal saline in the control group are shown in table 2. Heart rate, blood pressure, and artery diameter remained unchanged after normal saline infusion. Peak velocity integral, coronary blood flow, and resistance also remained unchanged after normal saline administration.

Table 2

Effects of normal saline on eight control subjects

STUDY GROUP

In the study group, heart rate and blood pressure did not change after BQ-123 administration (table 3). Proximal artery segment dimension increased by 6 (2)% after BQ-123 (p < 0.05v baseline) (fig 3). Distal artery segment dimension increased by 12 (3)% after BQ-123 (p < 0.05v baseline) (fig 3). The increase in the distal arterial segment after BQ-123 was 11(3)% and 14 (5)% (p > 0.05) in patients with and without coronary artery disease, respectively (table 3). The vasodilator effect of BQ-123 was greater (p < 0.05) in the distal than in the proximal segments.

Table 3

The effects of BQ-123 on the studied variables in 14 individuals, mean (SEM) age 53 (2) years (nine men, five women)

Figure 3

Line plots of the diameter of the (A) proximal and (B) distal arterial segments after BQ-123 administration. The vasodilatation of the distal segments was greater (p < 0.05) than that of the proximal segments. *p < 0.05 v baseline.

The peak velocity integral showed a trend to increase after BQ-123 (table 3). Coronary blood flow increased by 17 (5) ml/min after BQ-123 administration (p < 0.05 v baseline) (table 3, fig 4). The increase of coronary blood flow after BQ-123 was similar (p > 0.05) in patients with and without coronary artery disease.

Figure 4

Line plots of (A) coronary blood flow and (B) vascular resistance after BQ-123 administration. *p < 0.05 v baseline.

Coronary vascular resistance decreased by 0.55 (0.21) mm Hg/ml/min (p < 0.05) after BQ-123 administration, and the changes were similar in patients with and without coronary artery disease (table 3, fig 4). An analysis of variance and linear regression analysis did not show any relation between the BQ-123 responses and heart rate, blood pressure, or big ET-1 changes.

Plasma big ET-1 was similar in patients with and without coronary artery disease and in control subjects. It did not change significantly after BQ-123. There was no significant correlation between the baseline big ET-1 and the effect of a 60 minute infusion of BQ-123 on the coronary blood flow (r = −0.02, p > 0.05) or on coronary vascular resistance (r = −0.19, p > 0.05).

Discussion

Our study shows that inhibition of the actions of endogenous ET-1 at the ETA receptor causes coronary vasodilatation, mainly in the distal arterial segments, and increases coronary blood flow in patients undergoing coronary arteriography. Because responses were similar in subjects with and without coronary artery disease, this provides clear evidence for the first time of a physiological role for endogenously generated ET-1 in the regulation of coronary vascular tone, extending earlier observations in the peripheral vasculature.5

A greater percentage increase in coronary artery diameter was observed in the smaller than in the larger epicardial vessels after BQ-123—an effect similar in magnitude, but of opposite nature, to the withdrawal of nitric oxide mediated dilator tone associated with intracoronary administration of the nitric oxide synthase inhibitor, L-NG-monomethyl-arginine.24 A similar finding has been reported previously for glyceryl trinitrate,25 atrial natriuretic factor,26and other coronary vasodilators.27 However, the mechanism of this differential response remains unclear. Previous investigators have suggested that this differential effect on small rather than large epicardial arteries reflects increased basal coronary tone or hypersensitivity of the distal coronary artery segments to coronary vasodilators.28 The hypersensitivity may be caused by an alteration in the neural receptor responses of the smooth muscle cell membrane properties,29 ,30 or by an inherent difference in the pharmacological behaviour of the smooth muscle at different levels of the coronary arterial tree.26

The results of this study are consistent with the effects of exogenously administered ET-1 on coronary vascular tone.13Cannan and colleagues showed in anaesthetised dogs that ET-1 at pathophysiological concentrations mediates coronary vasoconstriction through the ETA and not the ETBreceptor.12 Recently, it was also found that ETB receptors do not contribute to ET-1 induced vasoconstriction in isolated human coronary arteries.31The ETA receptor is widely present in vascular smooth muscle and is highly expressed in coronary vessels. Stimulation of the ETA receptors by their natural ligand, ET-1, which is derived from the adjacent endothelium and in some cases from high concentrations in plasma, causes G protein coupled activation of phospholipase C and an increase in intracellular calcium; this is linked to increases in intracellular inositol triphosphate and membrane diacyglycerol. ET-1 is now thought to be produced continuously within the endothelium of peripheral blood vessels and the coronary circulation, to provide a contribution to endogenous vascular tone. ETA antagonists are thought to produce vasodilatation by local withdrawal of this ET-1 mediated tone caused by tonic stimulation of the ETA receptors. In addition, when the ETAreceptors are blocked by ETA antagonists, endogenous ET-1 may act predominantly on the endothelial ETB receptors to release nitric oxide,7 which makes an additional contribution to the reduction in vascular tone and the resultant vasodilatation. Although the ETA receptor appears to be the major receptor responsible for ET-1 mediated vasoconstriction, further studies with selective ETB receptor antagonists, such as BQ-788,7 are necessary to determine the physiological role of ETB receptors in the coronary circulation.

Coronary arteries can be divided into two functional components: large epicardial conductance arteries and smaller resistance arterioles. We found that distal epicardial arterial segments dilated more than the proximal epicardial segments. We also showed a decrease in coronary vascular resistance as a consequence of vasodilatation of the resistance arterioles (fig 5). ETA receptors may therefore be mainly concentrated in, or be more important in, the distal segments. Consequently, the resistance vessels of the human coronary vasculature are the major site of action after ETA receptor blockade with BQ-123. This is in accordance with the findings of Rigel and Lappe,32 who showed that in anaesthetised dogs conduit and resistance coronary vasoconstriction were mediated by the ETA receptor, with the ETA receptor being potentially important in mediating resistance vessel constriction.

Figure 5

Schematic representation of the coronary arterial bed and possible effects of ETA antagonism. Coronary arteries can be divided into two functional components: large epicardial conductance arteries and smaller resistance arterioles. ETAantagonism dilates the distal epicardial arterial segments and the resistance vessels more than the proximal arterial segments, causing a decrease in coronary artery resistance and an increase in blood flow.

We used an ETA selective dose of BQ-123 which is at—or more likely just below—the dose that causes changes in systemic haemodynamics. This is important. A recent study examined the effects of bosentan on systemic haemodynamics and epicardial coronary artery tone in patients with ischaemic heart disease,33 but because the drug was not given locally and most of its effect would have been on the systemic circulation, it is not clear from that paper whether the effect is a direct one or is mediated indirectly through neurohormonal mechanisms.

Although the dose of BQ-123 was chosen to achieve maximum inhibition at ETA receptors, based on the forearm infusion studies,5 we did not study higher doses, so we cannot say with certainty that we have seen the maximum possible local effects of ETA blockade. Against this, studies in hand veins show that the effects of exogenous ET-1 are modulated by dilator prostanoids.34 Hence, aspirin pretreatment of the patients may have enhanced the constrictor potential of endogenous ET-1 if coronary vessels behave in a similar manner to the hand veins. Before the study, all our patients received heparin, which can interact with mediators of the vascular endothelium, possibly through a nitric oxide mediated mechanism.35 Administration of heparin was required by the experimental protocol, but as the same dosage was given to the control subjects we believe that our results were not affected.

Plasma big ET-1 concentrations are believed to provide a measure of global vascular ET-1 generation, albeit a poor one.23 We hypothesised, therefore, that plasma big ET-1 might predict the coronary vasodilator response to BQ-123. In the event, plasma big ET-1 did not appear to be valuable in this regard.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study shows that endogenously generated ET-1 contributes to the maintenance of coronary vascular tone in humans, acting at least in part through ETA receptors. Because these effects were present in subjects with coronary artery disease as well as in those without, endothelin receptor antagonists may thus have potential as vasodilator agents in the treatment of coronary artery disease.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the Elpen Pharmaceutical Company for the preparation of the BQ-123 for human use. DJW is supported by a research leave fellowship from the Wellcome Trust (WT 0526330).

References