Expedited Publication
Improvements in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Outcomes in Lower Surgical Risk Patients: A Glimpse Into the Future

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2011.10.868Get rights and content
Under an Elsevier user license
open archive

Objectives

The purpose of this study was to investigate the evolution of patient selection criteria for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) and its impact on clinical outcomes.

Background

Anecdotal evidence suggests that patient selection for TAVI is shifting toward lower surgical risk patients. The extent of this shift and its impact on clinical outcomes, however, are currently unknown.

Methods

We conducted a single-center study that subcategorized TAVI patients into quartiles (Q1 to Q4) defined by enrollment date. These subgroups were subsequently examined for differences in baseline characteristics and 30-day and 6-month mortality rate. The relationship between quartiles and mortality rate was examined using unadjusted and adjusted (for baseline characteristics) Cox proportional hazard models.

Results

Each quartile included 105 patients (n = 420). Compared with Q4 patients, Q1 patients had higher logistic EuroSCORES (25.4 ± 16.1% vs. 17.8 ± 12.0%, p < 0.001), higher Society of Thoracic Surgeons scores (7.1 ± 5.5% vs. 4.8 ± 2.6%, p > 0.001), and higher median N-terminal pro–B-type natriuretic peptide levels (3,495 vs. 1,730 ng/dl, p < 0.046). From Q1 to Q4, the crude 30-day and 6-month mortality rate decreased significantly from 11.4% to 3.8% (unadjusted hazard ratio [HR]: 0.33; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.11 to 1.01; p = 0.053) and from 23.5% to 12.4% (unadjusted HR: 0.49; 95 CI: 0.25 to 0.95; p = 0.07), respectively. After adjustment for baseline characteristics, there were no significant differences between Q1 and Q4 in 30-day mortality rate (adjusted HR ratio: 0.29; 95% CI: 0.08 to 1.08; p = 0.07) and 6-month mortality rate (HR: 0.67; 95% CI: 0.25 to 1.77; p = 0.42).

Conclusions

The results of this study demonstrate an important paradigm shift toward the selection of lower surgical risk patients for TAVI. Significantly better clinical outcomes can be expected in lower than in higher surgical risk patients undergoing TAVI.

Key Words

aortic stenosis
transcatheter aortic
valve implantation

Abbreviations and Acronyms

CI
confidence interval
HR
hazard ratio
SAVR
surgical aortic valve replacement
STS
Society of Thoracic Surgeons
TAVI
transcatheter aortic valve implantation

Cited by (0)

Dr. Lange is a consultant and advisor for Medtronic. Drs. Bleiziffer and Mazzitelli are consultants and proctors for Medtronic and Edwards LifeSciences. Dr. Voss is a instructor for Medtronic and receives financial compensation. Dr. Piazza is a consultant and proctor for Medtronic and CardiAQ. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose.