Cardiomyopathy
Comparison of Outcomes in Patients With Probable Versus Definite Cardiac Sarcoidosis

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.01.562Get rights and content

Patients with probable cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) who satisfy only clinical cardiac findings for CS are not uncommon. The aim of this study was to compare outcomes between patients with probable CS and those with definite CS treated with steroids. The study population consisted of 101 consecutive patients who satisfied clinical cardiac findings for CS. Patients with definite CS were defined as having histologic or clinical confirmation of CS according to the guidelines and were treated with steroids. Patients with probable CS were defined as having only clinical cardiac findings but not definite CS because of no histologic confirmation or extracardiac sarcoidosis and were not treated with steroids. The end point was major adverse cardiac events. Forty-seven patients had definite CS, and the other 54 had probable CS. Except for serum angiotensin-converting enzyme levels and left ventricular dysfunction, clinical characteristics were similar between the 2 groups. Over a median follow-up period of 15 months, major adverse cardiac events occurred more frequently in patients with probable CS than in those with definite CS (74% vs 53%, p = 0.029). The event-free survival rate was worse in patients with probable CS than in those with definite CS (log-rank test, p = 0.006). Cox proportional-hazards analysis showed that probable CS was an independent predictor of major adverse cardiac events. In conclusion, outcomes were worse in patients with probable CS than in those with definite CS treated with steroids. The initiation of steroid treatment may be considered for patients who satisfy only clinical cardiac findings for CS.

Section snippets

Methods

We enrolled 109 consecutive patients who satisfied the CS diagnostic guidelines' clinical cardiac findings from December 1994 to April 2014. The guidelines for diagnosis of CS9, 10 are listed in Table 1. In brief, CS is diagnosed on the basis of histologic or clinical confirmation. Histologic diagnosis is confirmed when endomyocardial biopsy demonstrates noncaseating epithelioid cell granulomas. Clinical diagnosis is confirmed in the absence of endomyocardial biopsy when extracardiac

Results

Among the 47 patients with definite CS, 18 had histologic confirmation and 29 had clinical confirmation. All patients with definite CS were initiated on prednisone at doses of 30 or 40 mg/day. Thirty-eight patients had positive myocardial uptake on 67Ga scintigraphy or FDG PET at baseline, and all of them showed the disappearance of myocardial uptake on repeat 67Ga scintigraphy or FDG PET after steroid treatment. Among the 54 patients with probable CS, 44 satisfied >2 of 4 major findings, and

Discussion

The major findings of the present study are as follows: (1) clinical characteristics except for serum angiotensin-converting enzyme levels and left ventricular dysfunction were similar between patients with probable CS and those with definite CS, (2) outcomes were worse in patients with probable CS than in those with definite CS treated with steroids, and (3) probable CS was an independent predictor of MACEs.

There are 2 main scenarios for the manifestation of CS. In the first, patients with

Disclosures

The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclosure.

References (22)

  • M.R. Patel et al.

    Detection of myocardial damage in patients with sarcoidosis

    Circulation

    (2009)
  • Cited by (15)

    • Long-Term Outcome in Probable Versus Absolute Cardiac Sarcoidosis

      2019, American Journal of Cardiology
      Citation Excerpt :

      This observation bears significantly on daily work as it supports the clinical equivalence of probable to absolute diagnosis of CS as long as the former adheres to the criteria specified in recent recommendations8,9 and used in our study. The only earlier study comparing diagnostic subgroups in CS found, unlike us, a worse outcome in probable than in definite CS.10 However, the subgroups were different from ours since patients with probable CS had neither clinical nor histologic evidence of sarcoidosis but only cardiac manifestations included in the Japanese diagnostic criteria11 (and seen in many other myocardial diseases as well).

    • Cardiac sarcoidosis: Diagnosis, therapeutic management and prognostic factors

      2017, Archives of Cardiovascular Diseases
      Citation Excerpt :

      CS is known to have a bad prognosis, with an estimated mortality rate of up to 50% [6,7]. We and others have shown that in patients who received steroids alone or combined with IST, the 5-year survival rate reached 60–90% [4,8,9,13], with a reduced risk of major adverse cardiac events [33]. To our knowledge, an analysis of CS relapses and their related factors has never been carried out.

    • Early and frequent defibrillator discharge in patients with cardiac sarcoidosis compared with patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy

      2017, International Journal of Cardiology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Therefore, in the clinical setting, some patients are considered as suspected CS that satisfies the guideline-established clinical cardiac findings of CS [8,9], but they are not determined definite CS because of the absence of histological confirmation or extracardiac sarcoidosis. In our previous study, the clinical characteristics of patients with suspected CS were similar to those of patients with definite CS, and the outcome in patients with suspected CS was worse than that in patients with definite CS [10]. These findings might indicate the need to recognize suspected CS as CS and treat with the same therapeutic strategy.

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    See page 1296 for disclosure information.

    View full text