Brief reportsClinical variables predicting inappropriate use of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator in patients with coronary heart disease or nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy
References (18)
- et al.
Comparison of arrhythmia recurrence in patients presenting with ventricular fibrillation versus ventricular tachycardia in the Antiarrhythmics Versus Implantable Defibrillators (AVID) trial
Am J Cardiol
(2003) - et al.
Do atrial tachyarrhythmias beget ventricular tachyarrhythmias in defibrillator recipients?
J Am Coll Cardiol
(2002) - et al.
Ventricular tachycardias above the initially programmed tachycardia detection interval in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillatorsIncidence, prediction and significance
J Am Coll Cardiol
(2000) - et al.
Improved survival with an implanted defibrillator in patients with coronary disease at high risk for ventricular arrhythmiaMulticenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial Investigators
N Engl J Med
(1996) A comparison of antiarrhythmic-drug therapy with implantable defibrillators in patients resuscitated from near-fatal ventricular arrhythmias
N Engl J Med
(1997)- et al.
Prophylactic implantation of a defibrillator in patients with myocardial infarction and reduced ejection fraction
N Engl J Med
(2002) - et al.
Electrocardiographically documented unnecessary, spontaneous shocks in 241 patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol
(1992) - et al.
Limitations and late complications of third-generation automatic cardioverter-defibrillators
Circulation
(1995) - et al.
Clinical experience with the new detection algorithms for atrial fibrillation of a defibrillator with dual chamber sensing and pacing
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol
(1999)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.
Cited by (0)
Copyright © 2005 Excerpta Medica Inc. All rights reserved.