Real-time PCR for rapid diagnosis of entero- and rhinovirus infections using LightCycler
Introduction
PCR has markedly improved the diagnosis of enterovirus and rhinovirus infections by increasing the sensitivity compared with traditional cell culture (Andreoletti et al., 1998, Pozo et al., 1998, Kessler et al., 1997, Rotbart et al., 1994). In most occasions PCR is also more rapid than cell culture but still many RT-PCR protocols are time-consuming and labor intensive, particularly if accompanied by separate hybridization step.
New real-time PCR techniques have enabled rapid virus PCR assays and quantification during the PCR reaction (Wittwer et al., 1997a, Wittwer et al., 1997b). These are important advantages in the diagnosis of enterovirus and rhinovirus infections allowing rapid diagnosis and right treatment. Quantification may become more important in future when treatments with new antiviral agents will be available.
The aim of the present study was to develop a rapid and sensitive real-time PCR method, which would simultaneously detect entero- and rhinoviruses, distinguish enteroviruses from rhinoviruses, quantify the viral load and be applicable for routine diagnostic laboratory work. We used the LightCycler (LC) (Roche Diagnostics) protocol, which is a fast real-time monitoring PCR system, where amplification and detection can be accomplished in one closed capillary.
Section snippets
Viral stocks and clinical specimen
Prototype enteroviruses and rhinoviruses were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, Manassas, VA). All clinical specimens originated from the diagnostic virus laboratory of the Tampere University Hospital. The samples were collected during the years 1999 and 2001, these included cerebrospinal fluids (CSF), nasopharyngeal aspirates (NPA) and stool samples. All samples were stored at −70 °C until analyzed. Vero cells and A549 cells were used for virus isolation from clinical
RT-reaction
LC allows one-tube RT-PCR reaction where both RT and PCR reactions can be carried out in the same capillary without any addition of reagents using the LC-RNA amplification kits developed for this purpose. We found that the results obtained using this type of one tube system were more variable than when RT-reaction was carried out prior PCR in a separate tube. In repeated tests the same clearly RNA positive sample gave sometimes negative and sometimes positive results. Therefore, we used
Discussion
PCR methods have significantly improved the diagnosis of enterovirus infections by increasing sensitivity and giving results in a shorter time than traditional cell culture. Better sensitivity is an important advantage when the amount of the virus is low leading to false negative findings in cell culture (like CSF samples in viral meningitis). Currently, PCR methods are widely used in clinical laboratories to diagnose enterovirus infections, but virus isolation is still important particularly
Acknowledgements
We thank Olfert Landt from TIBMolbiol for help in probe designing. We gratefully acknowledge Marja-Leena Vuorinen for technical assistance. The study was financially supported by grants from the Tampere University Hospital, the Academy of Finland and the Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation.
References (20)
- et al.
Comparison of PCR primer pairs in the detection of human rhinoviruses in nasopharyngeal aspirates
J. Virol. Methods
(1997) - et al.
Evaluation of a rapid real-time RT-PCR assay for detection of enterovirus RNA in cerebrospinal fluid specimens
J. Clin. Virol.
(2002) - et al.
Rapid diagnosis of enterovirus infections by real-time PCR on the LightCycler using the TaqMan format
Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis.
(2002) - et al.
Comparison of use of cerebrospinal fluid, serum, and throat swab specimens in diagnosis of enteroviral acute neurological infection by a rapid RNA detection PCR assay
J. Clin. Microbiol.
(1998) - et al.
Identification of enteroviruses in clinical specimens by competitive PCR followed by genetic typing using sequence analysis
J. Clin. Microbiol.
(1996) - et al.
Molecular detection and identification of enteroviruses using enzymatic amplification and nucleic acid hybridization
J. Clin. Microbiol.
(1990) - et al.
Development and evaluation of a ‘real-time’ RT-PCR for the detection of enterovirus and parechovirus RNA in CSF and throat swab samples
J. Med. Virol.
(2002) - et al.
Detection of enteroviruses and rhinoviruses in clinical specimens by PCR and liquid-phase hybridization
J. Clin. Microbiol.
(1995) - et al.
Molecular diagnosis of human rhinovirus infections: comparison with virus isolation
J. Clin. Microbiol.
(1998) - et al.
Rapid diagnosis of enterovirus infection by a new one-step reverse transcription-PCR assay
J. Clin. Microbiol.
(1997)