Clinical practiceCompleteness of reporting trial results: effect on physicians' willingness to prescribe
References (31)
- et al.
Absolutely relative: How research results are summarized can affect treatment decisions
Am J Med
(1992) Fraud, distortion, delusion, and consensus; the problems of human on natural deception in epidemiologic science
Am J Med
(1988)- et al.
The need for clarification of percent risk reduction data in clinical cardiovascular trial reports
J Am Coll Cardiol
(1989) Invidious comparisons and unmet clinical challenges
Am J Med
(1992)It is still controversial which is the correct way to report and to interpret event rates of clinical trials (letter)
Int J Cardiol
(1992)- et al.
Colestipol hydrochloride in hypercholesterolemic patients. Effect on serum cholesterol and mortality
J Chron Dis
(1978) - et al.
Retardation of angiographic progression of coronary artery disease by nifedipine. Results of the International Nifedipine Trial on Atherosclerotic therapy (INTACT)
Lancet
(1990) - et al.
Risk preference and decision making in crtitical care situations
Chest
(1988) - et al.
Measured enthusiasm: does the method of reporting trial results alter perception of therapeutic effectiveness?
Ann Intern Med
(1992) - et al.
Helsinki heart study: primary prevention trial with gemfibrozil in middle-aged men with dyslipidemia
N Engl J Med
(1987)
Prevenzione della malattia coronarica: l'importanza della terapia continuativa normolipemizzante
JAMA (Italian Edition)
(1991)
An assessment of clinically useful measures of the consequences of treatment
N Engl J Med
(1988)
The road from research to new diagnosis and therapy
Science
(1978)
Treatment of mild hypertension and the reduction of cardiovascular mortality: the 'of' or 'by' dilemma
JAMA
(1983)
Treating hypercholesterolemia. How should practising physicians interpret the published data for patients?
N Engl J Med
(1989)
Cited by (0)
Copyright © 1994 Published by Elsevier Ltd.