Original ArticleAssessing risk in acute chest pain: The value of stress myocardial perfusion imaging in patients admitted through the emergency department
Introduction
Each year in the United States more than 6 million patients present to an emergency department (ED) with chest pain or other symptoms suggestive of acute cardiac ischemia. The majority of these patients are hospitalized or admitted to an observation unit because initial clinical examination, electrocardiogram (ECG) results, and cardiac biomarkers are insufficient to exclude an acute coronary syndrome (ACS).1
Recent guidelines have endorsed stress-gated myocardial single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) as an appropriate test for evaluating patients with acute chest pain (ACP) and possible ACS.2, 3, 4 These recommendations are based in part on previous studies performed over a decade ago in patients presenting with unstable angina pectoris (UAP).5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 More recently, the Adenosine Post Infarction Evaluation Trial (INSPIRE) demonstrated the value of adenosine SPECT for assessing risk in stabilized patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI).11 However, there is limited information regarding the use of stress SPECT in low to intermediate risk patients admitted through the ED with ACP.12, 13, 14, 15 Therefore, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the role of stress SPECT for evaluating risk and guiding therapeutic decision making in this contemporary patient population.
Section snippets
Study Population
This was a prospective observational cohort study in 1,576 patients >18 years of age who had ACP of uncertain cardiac etiology and who were hospitalized under observational status pending further evaluation with SPECT. During the 29-month enrollment period, 5,066 patients with ACP were evaluated in the ED of whom 1,317 (26%) were discharged home with a diagnosis of non-cardiac chest pain. Of the remaining 3,749 admitted patients, 2,173 had ACP consistent with or highly suggestive of ACS and
Baseline Characteristics (Table 2)
For the entire cohort of 1,576 subjects, mean patient age was 55.5 ± 13.8 (range 21 to 100) years and 58% of enrolled subjects were women. Cardiac risk factors were prevalent with a mean of 1.9 ± 1.0 risk factors per patient. The mean BMI of the cohort was 30.7 ± 7.3. The mean TIMI risk score was 1.7 ± 1.0 with 1,254 (80%) patients having a low (i.e., 0-2) risk score and 322 (20%) an intermediate (i.e., 3-5) risk score. No patient had a high TIMI risk score (i.e., >5) due to exclusion criteria.
Discussion
The current study demonstrates the value of stress SPECT for evaluating a heterogenous group of patients who were admitted through the ED with ACP of uncertain cardiac etiology. Although it is generally recognized that stress SPECT can accurately risk stratify stable patients with chest pain,23 there is limited information of its potential diagnostic and prognostic role in low to intermediate risk chest pain patients in the contemporary ED setting.12, 13, 14, 15 Previous studies have primarily
Study Limitations
This was a single center study; however, our patients had a similar clinical risk profile as observed in multi-center trials evaluating patients in the ED setting and with a comparable overall event rate.12, 13, 14, 15 Second, coronary angiography was not performed in all patients and, therefore, the diagnostic accuracy of SPECT could not be ascertained. Instead, we focused on the prognostic importance of SPECT for identifying high- and low-risk groups. Third, our definition of UAP required the
Conclusion
Stress SPECT can accurately assess risk in ED patients admitted with chest pain of uncertain cardiac etiology and beyond that provided by clinical assessment alone. Our results support the use of stress SPECT for identifying very low-risk ACP patients with normal study results who can be safely discharged home.
References (27)
- et al.
Appropriateness Criteria for Coronary Revascularization: a report by the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriateness Criteria Task Force, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Thoracic Surgeons, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, American Heart Association, and the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology Endorsed by the American Society of Echocardiography, the Heart Failure Society of America, and the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography
J Am Coll Cardiol
(2009) - et al.
ACC/AHA 2007 guidelines for the management of patients with unstable angina/non-ST-Elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 2002 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Unstable Angina/Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction) developed in collaboration with the American College of Emergency Physicians, the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons endorsed by the American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation and the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine
J Am Coll Cardiol
(2007) Prognostic value of thallium-201 myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with unstable angina who respond to medical treatment
J Am Coll Cardiol
(1991)- et al.
Dipyridamole technetium 99m sestamibi myocardial tomography as an independent predictor of cardiac event-free survival after acute ischemic events
J Nucl Cardiol
(1994) - et al.
Prognostic value of predischarge dipyridamole technetium 99m sestamibi myocardial tomography in medically treated patients with unstable angina
Am Heart J
(1995) - et al.
Exercise technetium-99m myocardial tomography for the risk stratification of men with medically treated unstable angina pectoris
Am J Cardiol
(1995) - et al.
Prognostic value of intravenous dipyridamole thallium scintigraphy after an acute myocardial ischemic event
Am J Cardiol
(1989) - et al.
A multinational study to establish the value of early adenosine technetium-99m sestamibi myocardial perfusion imaging in identifying a low-risk group for early hospital discharge following acute myocardial infarction
J Am Coll Cardiol
(2006) - et al.
Assessment of patients with low-risk chest pain in the emergency department: Head-to-head comparison of exercise stress echocardiography and exercise myocardial SPECT
Am Heart J
(2005) - et al.
The diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography compared with stress nuclear imaging in emergency department low-risk chest pain patients
Ann Emerg Med
(2007)
A randomized controlled trial of multi-slice coronary computed tomography for evaluation of acute chest pain
J Am Coll Cardiol
Coronary computed tomography angiography for early triage of patients with acute chest pain: The ROMICAT (Rule Out Myocardial Infarction using Computer Assisted Tomography) trial
J Am Coll Cardiol
ASNC imaging guidelines for nuclear cardiology procedures: Myocardial perfusion and function: single photon emission computed tomography
J Nucl Cardiol
Cited by (28)
Management of Patients With NSTE-ACS: A Comparison of the Recent AHA/ACC and ESC Guidelines
2016, Journal of the American College of CardiologyNoninvasive Diagnostic Modalities for the Evaluation of Coronary Artery Disease
2016, Translational Research in Coronary Artery Disease: Pathophysiology to TreatmentGuía ESC 2015 sobre el tratamiento de los síndromes coronarios agudos en pacientes sin elevación persistente del segmento ST: Grupo de Trabajo de la Sociedad Europea de Cardiología (ESC) para el tratamiento de los síndromes coronarios agudos en pacientes sin elevación persistente del segmento ST
2015, Revista Espanola de CardiologiaACCF/AHA/ASE/ASNC/HFSA/HRS/SCAI/SCCT/SCMR/STS 2013 multimodality appropriate use criteria for the detection and risk assessment of stable ischemic heart disease
2014, Journal of the American College of Cardiology