Table 1

Characteristics and design of the studies

StudyNumber of patients with HFpEFAge
(years)
WomenLVEF criteriaLV strain (GLS)Control groupFollow-up
Wang et al42063 ± 1635%≥ 50%18 LV segments - EchoPacyesno
Liu et al52668 ± 1331%≥ 50%18 LV segments - EchoPacyesno
Phan et al274067 ± 1073%> 50%12 LV segments - EchoPacyesno
Tan et al65672 ± 769.6%> 50%12 LV segments - EchoPacyesno
Kasner et al282151 ± 4.252%≥ 50%18 LV segments - EchoPacyesno
Morris et al711970 ± 1044%> 50%18 LV segments - EchoPacyesno
Yip et al811274 ± 1264%≥ 50%18 LV segments - EchoPacyesno
Abe et al91065 ± 1230%≥ 50%16 LV segments - TomTecyesnot reported in HFpEF
Obokata et al104077 ± 1365%> 50%18 LV segments - EchoPacyesno
Pellicori et al2913878 ± 1037%≥ 50%18 LV segments - EchoPacyes28 months
Kraigher-Krainer et al1121971 ± 961%≥ 45%12 LV segments - TomTecyesno
Menet et al124070 ± 1377%≥ 50%18 LV segments - EchoPacyesno
Luo et al135870 ± 1040%≥ 50%16 LV segments - Toshibayesno
Donal et al19 2035676 ± 955.9%> 45%18 LV segments - EchoPacno28 months
Wang et al308066 ± 837%> 50%18 LV segments - EchoPacno36 months
Stampehl et al1410060 ± 176%≥ 50%18 LV segments - EchoPacno12 months
Shah et al1544770.3 ± 9.853.7%≥ 45%12 LV segments - TomTecyes31 months
Kosmala et al1620763.7 ± 8.673%≥ 50%18 LV segments - EchoPacyesno
Morris et al1721872 ± 10.552.3%> 50%18 LV segments - EchoPacyesno
Toufan et al1812657.5 ± 1069.8%≥ 50%16 LV segments - EchoPacyesno
Freed et al3130865 ± 1364%≥ 50%12 LV segments - TomTecno13 months
Carluccio et al214675 ± 852%≥ 50%18 LV segments - EchoPacyesno
Iwano et al225059 ± 1670%≥ 50%12 LV segments - QLabyesno
Hung et al235864.3 ± 12.453.4%> 50%18 LV segments - EchoPacyesno
Obokata et al3210277 ± 1157%≥ 45%18 LV segments - Epsilonno12 months
DeVore et al3318769 ± 2.548.1%≥ 50%18 LV segments - TomTecno6 months
Huang et al2412975.1 ± 10.758%≥ 45%18 LV segments - EchoPacno36 months
Lo et al257473.8 ± 1760.8%≥ 50%18 LV segments - EchoPacyesno
Bosch et al2615968 ± 1152%≥ 50%18 LV segments - EchoPacyes24 months
  • In the study by Bosch et al,26 159 out of 219 patients were feasible to perform GLS analyses and the reported follow-up with outcomes analysis did not include GLS. The studies by Donal et al19 20 included a first outcomes analysis on GLS using a continuous Cox regression analysis and a second post hoc outcomes analysis on GLS using a dichotomous Cox regression analysis.

  • GLS, global longitudinal systolic strain; HFpEF, heart failure with preserved ejection fraction; LV, left ventricular; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction.