Table 3

Risk of bias of included studies (trials)

Study (author, year, setting)ContextStudy designRandom sequence generation (selection bias)Allocation concealment (selection bias)Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)Selective reporting (reporting bias)Risk of bias assessment
O'Carroll, 2013 (UK)21First stroke/TIARCT++--++High risk of bias: performance and detection
Hornnes, 2011 (Denmark)22Acute stroke/TIARCT+++++High risk of bias: performance
McManus, 2009 (UK)23Stroke in hospitalRCT++++++Low risk of bias
Faulkner, 2000 (USA)17CABGRCT+++High risk of bias: selection, performance and detection
Hohmann, 2009 (Germany)29Ischaemic stroke/TIA in hospitalNon-randomised controlled intervention trial++High risk of bias: selection, performance and detection
Yilmaz, 2005 (Turkey)24Secondary prevention in hospitalRCT?++High risk of bias: selection, performance and detection
Johnston, 2010 (USA)19Ischaemic stroke in hospitalRCT++++High risk of bias: performance and detection
Thom, 2013 (India, Europe)20High CV riskRCT++??++Unclear risk of bias: performance and detection
Castellano, 2014 (Argentina, Brazil, Italy, Paraguay and Spain)25Aged >40 years with AMI within last 2 yearsRCT++??++Unclear risk of bias: performance and detection
Selak 2014 (New Zealand)28High CV riskRCT++++++Low risk of bias
Patel, 2015 (Australia, New Zealand)26High CV riskRCT++??++Unclear risk of bias: performance and detection
Choudhry, 2011 (USA)27AMI in hospitalRCT++??++Unclear risk of bias: performance and detection
  • ACS, acute coronary syndrome; AMI, acute myocardial infarction; CABG, coronary artery bypass graft; CHD, coronary heart disease; CV, cardiovascular; CVD, cardiovascular disease; RCT, randomised controlled intervention trial; TIA, transient ischaemic attack.