Table 3

Health-related quality of life results

Trial first author (year)Follow-upMeasureOutcome values (or change from baseline) at follow-up
Mean (SD)
Control versus exercise, between group p value
Between-group difference
Austin (2005)6 monthsMLWHF
Physical20.4 (12.2) vs 12.6 (9.7) p<0.0001*Exercise>control
Emotional8.0 (7.1) vs 4.4 (10.4) p<0.01*Exercise>control
Total36.9 (24.0) vs 22.9 (17.8) p<0.001*Exercise>control
EQ-5D0.58 (0.19) vs 0.70 (0.16) p<0.0001*Exercise>control
5 yearsMLWHF
Physical19.3 (23.5) vs 18.3 (11.2) p=0.66*Exercise=control
Emotional7.6 (7.1) vs 7.4 (6.5) p=0.88*Exercise=control
Total37.1 (24.9) vs 35.5 (21.7) p=0.72*Exercise=control
EQ-5D0.58 (0.22) vs 0.64 (0.19) p=0.12*Exercise=control
Bellardinelli (1999)15 monthsMLWHF total52 (20) vs 39 (20) p<0.001Exercise>control
29 months54 (22) vs 44 (21) p<0.001Exercise>control
DANREHAB (2008)12 monthsSF-36
PCS37.4 (11.4) vs 42.7 (9.1)* p=0.14Exercise=control
MCS50.5 (10.0) vs 49.7 (8.8)* p=0.81Exercise=control
Davidson (2010)12 monthsMLWHF total56.4 (18.3) vs 52.9 (15.7) p=0.33Exercise=control
Dracup (2007)6 monthsMLWHF
Physical19.4 (11.5) vs 16.1 (10.0) p=0.04*Exercise>control
Emotional10.5 (7.4) vs 7.8 (6.6) p=0.01*Exercise>control
Total43.2 (26.5) vs 35.7 (23.7) p=0.05Exercise>control
Gary (2010) Comp6 monthsMLWHF total34.3 (23.6) vs 24.2 (16.3) p=0.18*Exercise=control
Gary (2010) Exer6 monthsMLWHF total28.9 (29.9) vs 25.6 (19.7) p=0.71*Exercise=control
Gottlieb (1999)6 monthsMLWHF
TotalNR (NR) vs 22 (20) NRNR
MOS
PFNR (NR) vs 68 (28) NRNR
RLNR (NR) vs 50 (42) NRNR
GHNR (NR) vs 361 (224) NRNR
HF-ACTION (2009)3 monthsKCCQ+5.21 (95% CI 4.42 to 6.00) vs 3.28 (2.48 to 4.09) p<0.001Exercise>control
Jolly (2009)6 monthsMLWHF total34.5 (24.0) vs 36.3 (24.1) p=0.30Exercise=control
EQ-5D0.62 (0.32) vs 0.66 (0.24) p=0.004Exercise>control
MLWHF total34.9 (24.8) vs 37.6 (21.0) p=0.80Exercise=control
12 monthsEQ-5D0.69 (0.28) vs 0.68 (0.21) p=0.07Exercise=control
Jónsdóttir (2006)6 monthsIcelandic quality of life questionnaire4.10 (14.04) vs 47.55 (8.7) p=0.34Exercise=control
Klocek (2005)6.5 monthsPGWB total99.0 vs 109.0 (training grp constant) vs 71.7 (training grp progressive) p<0.01Exercise>control
Koukouvou (2004)6 monthsMLWHF total34.1 (13.0) vs 45.1 (9.9) p=0.05*Exercise>control
Spritzer QLI total7.1 (1.1) vs 9.1 (1.1) p<0.0001*Exercise>control
McKelvie (2002)12 monthsMLWHF total+ −3.3 (13.9) vs −3.4 (18.1) p=0.98Exercise=control
Nilsson (2008)12 monthsMLWHF total28 (20) vs 22 (12) p=0.003Exercise>control
Norman (2012)6 monthsKCCQ77.9 (11.6) vs 81.0 (18.2) p=0.78Exercise=control
Passino (2006)9.75 monthsMLWHF total53 (32) vs 32 (26.5) p<0.0001*Exercise>control
Willenheimer (2001)10 monthsPGAQoL0 (1) 0.7 vs (0.9) p=0.023Exercise>control
Witham (2005)6 monthsGCHFQ69 (13) vs 65 (10) p=0.48Exercise=control
Yeh (2011)12 monthsMLWHF total18 (6) vs 13 (4) p<0.0001Exercise>control
  • Exercise=control: no statistically significant difference (p>0.05) in HRQoL between exercise and control groups at follow-up.

  • Exercise>control: statistically significant (p≤0.05) higher HRQoL in exercise compared with control group at follow-up.

  • Exercise<control: statistically significant (p≤0.05) lower HRQoL in exercise versus control group at follow-up.

  • *p Values calculated by authors of this paper;+: change in outcome from baseline.

  • comp, comprehensive cardiac rehabilitattion; exer, exercise only cardiac rehabilitation; EQ-5D, EuroQoL; GCHFQ, Guyatt Chronic Heart Failure Questionnaire; GF, general health; HRQoL, health-related quality of life; KCCQ, Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire; MCS, Mental Component Score; MLWHF, Minnesota Living with Heart Failure questionnaire; NR, not reported; PCS, Physical Component Score; PF, physical functioning; PGAQoL, Patient’s Global Assessment of Quality of Life; PGWB, Psychological General Wellbeing Index; QLI, quality of life index; RL: role limitation; SF-36, Short-Form 36.