Table 2

Results of dynamic CO2 administration on end-tidal CO2 and ventilation

Mean (kPa)SD/meanMean (L/min)SD/mean
Baseline4.83±0.580.02±0.017.8±1.80.10±0.03
Untreated4.84±0.470.06±0.017.8±1.20.19±0.09
 p vs baseline0.90<0.0010.6<0.01
Predicted optimum4.90±0.450.04±0.018.4±1.20.14±0.06
 p vs baseline0.40<0.0010.5<0.01
 p vs untreated0.1<0.0010.2<0.01
Antiphase to predicted optimum4.85±0.430.06±0.027.2±1.80.24±0.09
 p vs baseline0.50.0010.2<0.001
 p vs untreated0.20.80.300.2
 p vs optimal0.200.1<0.01
  • Degree of oscillation and mean end-tidal CO2 and ventilation when the patients were quietly observed at rest ‘Baseline’, cardiac output was alternated using a pacemaker to induce oscillations ‘Untreated’, dynamic CO2 was applied to the induced oscillations coincident with peak ventilation ‘Predicted Optimal’, and dynamic CO2 was applied to the induced oscillations coincident with trough ventilation ‘Antiphase to predicted optimum’.